Re: [linux-next:master 1436/1582] drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c:2378:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'machine_is_assabet'

[Robert Jarzmik]

David Miller  writes:

> Please send me a fixup follow-on patch.
>
> If changes are in my tree, they are part of the permanent record
> and won't be rebased out.
Ok, understood, I'm on it.

Thanks.

-- 
Robert

Re: [linux-next:master 1436/1582] drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c:2378:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'machine_is_assabet'

[David Miller]

From: Robert Jarzmik 
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2016 21:58:06 +0200

> Hi David,
> 
> Here is a little mess I created with my former serie :
>>drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c: In function 'smc_drv_probe':
 drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c:2378:6: error: implicit declaration of 
 function 'machine_is_assabet' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>  if (machine_is_assabet() && machine_has_neponset())
>>  ^~
>>cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>>
>> vim +/machine_is_assabet +2378 drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c
> 
> The mess comes from the patch "net: smc91x: isolate u16 writes alignment
> workaround", where I though I had removed all "machine_is_*()" calls, and I
> didn't notice the machine_is_assabet() one.
> 
> The fix is to re-add the removed include in the wrong chunk in [1].
> 
> Now do you want :
>  - another apart patch to fix the faulty one
>  - a "fixup!" patch to fixup the commit in your next tree
>  - or anything else

Please send me a fixup follow-on patch.

If changes are in my tree, they are part of the permanent record
and won't be rebased out.

Re: [linux-next:master 1436/1582] drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c:2378:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'machine_is_assabet'

[Robert Jarzmik]

Hi David,

Here is a little mess I created with my former serie :
>drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c: In function 'smc_drv_probe':
>>> drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c:2378:6: error: implicit declaration of 
>>> function 'machine_is_assabet' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>  if (machine_is_assabet() && machine_has_neponset())
>  ^~
>cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> vim +/machine_is_assabet +2378 drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c

The mess comes from the patch "net: smc91x: isolate u16 writes alignment
workaround", where I though I had removed all "machine_is_*()" calls, and I
didn't notice the machine_is_assabet() one.

The fix is to re-add the removed include in the wrong chunk in [1].

Now do you want :
 - another apart patch to fix the faulty one
 - a "fixup!" patch to fixup the commit in your next tree
 - or anything else

As I didn't compile assabet, my testers have missed this one. Please tell me
which way suits you to repair this commit.

Cheers.

--
Robert
[1]
@@ -63,8 +63,6 @@
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_ARM)
 
-#include 
-
 /* Now the bus width is specified in the platform data
  * pretend here to support all I/O access types
  */