Re: QRTR merge conflict resolution (was: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree)

2016-05-14 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Friday 13 May 2016 17:47:17 Andy Gross wrote:
> On 13 May 2016 at 17:19, Bjorn Andersson  wrote:
> > On Fri 13 May 14:01 PDT 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> >> On Tuesday 10 May 2016 11:39:34 Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > [..]
> >> > I assume we could have the QRTR go through Andy and arm-soc, with
> >> > David's approval and this fix squashed in. But we're running rather late
> >> > in this cycle, perhaps we should just back the QRTR patches out and I
> >> > can respin and resend them after the merge window (for v4.8 instead)?
> >>
> >> I'd suggest you do a merge of next-next with the qcom/soc-2 branch that
> >> we have in arm-soc and resolve the conflict in the merge, then send
> >> a pull request with the merge to davem.
> >>
> >
> > Hi David,
> >
> > In case you missed this thread, linux-next highlighted an upcoming merge
> > conflict between the net-next and one of the branches included in the
> > arm-soc trees.
> >
> > I have prepared the merge of net-next and the conflicting tag from the
> > Qualcomm SOC, please include this in your pull towards Linus to avoid
> > the merge conflict.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
> >
> > The following changes since commit ed7cbbce544856b20e5811de373cf92e92499771:
> >
> >   udp: Resolve NULL pointer dereference over flow-based vxlan device 
> > (2016-05-13 01:56:14 -0400)
> 
> 
> OK. The contents look good to me.
> 
> Acked-by: Andy Gross 

Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann 


Re: QRTR merge conflict resolution (was: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree)

2016-05-13 Thread Andy Gross
On 13 May 2016 at 17:19, Bjorn Andersson  wrote:
> On Fri 13 May 14:01 PDT 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 10 May 2016 11:39:34 Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> [..]
>> > I assume we could have the QRTR go through Andy and arm-soc, with
>> > David's approval and this fix squashed in. But we're running rather late
>> > in this cycle, perhaps we should just back the QRTR patches out and I
>> > can respin and resend them after the merge window (for v4.8 instead)?
>>
>> I'd suggest you do a merge of next-next with the qcom/soc-2 branch that
>> we have in arm-soc and resolve the conflict in the merge, then send
>> a pull request with the merge to davem.
>>
>
> Hi David,
>
> In case you missed this thread, linux-next highlighted an upcoming merge
> conflict between the net-next and one of the branches included in the
> arm-soc trees.
>
> I have prepared the merge of net-next and the conflicting tag from the
> Qualcomm SOC, please include this in your pull towards Linus to avoid
> the merge conflict.
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
> The following changes since commit ed7cbbce544856b20e5811de373cf92e92499771:
>
>   udp: Resolve NULL pointer dereference over flow-based vxlan device 
> (2016-05-13 01:56:14 -0400)


OK. The contents look good to me.

Acked-by: Andy Gross 


QRTR merge conflict resolution (was: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree)

2016-05-13 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Fri 13 May 14:01 PDT 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

> On Tuesday 10 May 2016 11:39:34 Bjorn Andersson wrote:
[..]
> > I assume we could have the QRTR go through Andy and arm-soc, with
> > David's approval and this fix squashed in. But we're running rather late
> > in this cycle, perhaps we should just back the QRTR patches out and I
> > can respin and resend them after the merge window (for v4.8 instead)?
> 
> I'd suggest you do a merge of next-next with the qcom/soc-2 branch that
> we have in arm-soc and resolve the conflict in the merge, then send
> a pull request with the merge to davem.
> 

Hi David,

In case you missed this thread, linux-next highlighted an upcoming merge
conflict between the net-next and one of the branches included in the
arm-soc trees.

I have prepared the merge of net-next and the conflicting tag from the
Qualcomm SOC, please include this in your pull towards Linus to avoid
the merge conflict.

Regards,
Bjorn

The following changes since commit ed7cbbce544856b20e5811de373cf92e92499771:

  udp: Resolve NULL pointer dereference over flow-based vxlan device 
(2016-05-13 01:56:14 -0400)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://github.com/andersson/kernel tags/net-next-qcom-soc-4.7-2-merge

for you to fetch changes up to f79a917e69e1f5cd86e864b67f06147f1b0340f4:

  Merge tag 'qcom-soc-for-4.7-2' into net-next (2016-05-13 14:42:23 -0700)


Merge tag 'qcom-soc-for-4.7-2' into net-next

This merges the Qualcomm SOC tree with the net-next, solving the
merge conflict in the SMD API between the two.


Andy Gross (1):
  Merge tag 'qcom-soc-for-4.7' into soc-for-4.7-p2

Bjorn Andersson (9):
  soc: qcom: smem_state: Add stubs for disabled smem_state
  soc: qcom: smd: Introduce callback setter
  soc: qcom: smd: Split discovery and state change work
  soc: qcom: smd: Refactor channel open and close handling
  soc: qcom: smd: Support multiple channels per sdev
  soc: qcom: smd: Support opening additional channels
  soc: qcom: smem: Use write-combine remap for SMEM
  soc: qcom: smd: Make callback pass channel reference
  Merge tag 'qcom-soc-for-4.7-2' into net-next

Lina Iyer (1):
  drivers: qcom: spm: avoid module usage in non-modular SPM driver

Srinivas Kandagatla (2):
  MAINTAINERS: add qcom i2c and spi drivers to list
  MAINTAINERS: add qcom clocks to the maintainers list

 MAINTAINERS |   3 +
 drivers/soc/qcom/smd-rpm.c  |   9 +-
 drivers/soc/qcom/smd.c  | 247 +++-
 drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c |   3 +-
 drivers/soc/qcom/spm.c  |   8 +-
 drivers/soc/qcom/wcnss_ctrl.c   |   8 +-
 include/linux/soc/qcom/smd.h|  33 -
 include/linux/soc/qcom/smem_state.h |  35 +
 net/qrtr/smd.c  |   9 +-
 9 files changed, 278 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)

> Alternatively, in case Linus merges net-next before we get that fix
> in, I could send Stephen's fix to Linus along with the pull requests.
> 
>   Arnd