Re: [net-next 0/3] tipc: improve interaction socket-link

2017-01-16 Thread David Miller
From: Jon Maloy 
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 20:35:08 +

> 
> 
>> -Original Message-
>> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
>> On Behalf Of David Miller
>> Sent: Monday, 16 January, 2017 14:45
>> To: Jon Maloy 
>> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk; Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan
>> ; Ying Xue
>> ; ma...@donjonn.com; tipc-
>> discuss...@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [net-next 0/3] tipc: improve interaction socket-link
>> 
>> From: Jon Maloy 
>> Date: Tue,  3 Jan 2017 10:26:45 -0500
>> 
>> > We fix a very real starvation problem that may occur when a link
>> > encounters send buffer congestion. At the same time we make the
>> > interaction between the socket and link layer simpler and more
>> > consistent.
>> 
>> This doesn't apply to net-next, also the Date in your emails is 10 days
>> in the past.  What's going on here?
> 
> I don't know. This series was sent in on Jan 3rd, and applied by you the same 
> day. Maybe the mail server decided to send you a duplicate?

If you look in the headers, they have "Received-by: " fields with
January 13th in the date.  So something pushed them out again.

Really strange...


RE: [net-next 0/3] tipc: improve interaction socket-link

2017-01-16 Thread Jon Maloy


> -Original Message-
> From: netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-ow...@vger.kernel.org]
> On Behalf Of David Miller
> Sent: Monday, 16 January, 2017 14:45
> To: Jon Maloy 
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk; Parthasarathy Bhuvaragan
> ; Ying Xue
> ; ma...@donjonn.com; tipc-
> discuss...@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [net-next 0/3] tipc: improve interaction socket-link
> 
> From: Jon Maloy 
> Date: Tue,  3 Jan 2017 10:26:45 -0500
> 
> > We fix a very real starvation problem that may occur when a link
> > encounters send buffer congestion. At the same time we make the
> > interaction between the socket and link layer simpler and more
> > consistent.
> 
> This doesn't apply to net-next, also the Date in your emails is 10 days
> in the past.  What's going on here?

I don't know. This series was sent in on Jan 3rd, and applied by you the same 
day. Maybe the mail server decided to send you a duplicate?

///jon



Re: [net-next 0/3] tipc: improve interaction socket-link

2017-01-16 Thread David Miller
From: Jon Maloy 
Date: Tue,  3 Jan 2017 10:26:45 -0500

> We fix a very real starvation problem that may occur when a link
> encounters send buffer congestion. At the same time we make the 
> interaction between the socket and link layer simpler and more 
> consistent.

This doesn't apply to net-next, also the Date in your emails is 10 days
in the past.  What's going on here?


Re: [net-next 0/3] tipc: improve interaction socket-link

2017-01-03 Thread David Miller
From: Jon Maloy 
Date: Tue,  3 Jan 2017 10:55:08 -0500

> We fix a very real starvation problem that may occur when a link
> encounters send buffer congestion. At the same time we make the 
> interaction between the socket and link layer simpler and more 
> consistent.

Series applied, thanks Jon.