Re: RFC iproute2 doc files
On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 10:31:09 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:11:59AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > I noticed that the iproute man pages are up to date but the LaTex > > documentation > > is very out of date. Rarely updated since the Linux 2.2 days. > > > > Either someone needs to do a massive editing job on them, or they should > > just > > be dropped. My preference would be to just drop everything in the doc/ > > directory. > > The current versions are so old, they can't be helping. > > If my vote counts, I will say to drop it. > > Thanks They are gone now in current git repo. If anyone wants them they can resurrect them from git and revise them. pgpdc3FY3BIky.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: RFC iproute2 doc files
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:11:59AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > I noticed that the iproute man pages are up to date but the LaTex > documentation > is very out of date. Rarely updated since the Linux 2.2 days. > > Either someone needs to do a massive editing job on them, or they should just > be dropped. My preference would be to just drop everything in the doc/ > directory. > The current versions are so old, they can't be helping. If my vote counts, I will say to drop it. Thanks signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: RFC iproute2 doc files
On Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:18:04 +0200 Simon Horman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:11:59AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > I noticed that the iproute man pages are up to date but the LaTex > > documentation > > is very out of date. Rarely updated since the Linux 2.2 days. > > > > Either someone needs to do a massive editing job on them, or they should > > just > > be dropped. My preference would be to just drop everything in the doc/ > > directory. > > The current versions are so old, they can't be helping. > > FWIW, removing stale documentation sounds sensible to me. I removed all the stale ones. The file ip-cref was occasionally updated.
Re: RFC iproute2 doc files
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 08:11:59AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > I noticed that the iproute man pages are up to date but the LaTex > documentation > is very out of date. Rarely updated since the Linux 2.2 days. > > Either someone needs to do a massive editing job on them, or they should just > be dropped. My preference would be to just drop everything in the doc/ > directory. > The current versions are so old, they can't be helping. FWIW, removing stale documentation sounds sensible to me.
RFC iproute2 doc files
I noticed that the iproute man pages are up to date but the LaTex documentation is very out of date. Rarely updated since the Linux 2.2 days. Either someone needs to do a massive editing job on them, or they should just be dropped. My preference would be to just drop everything in the doc/ directory. The current versions are so old, they can't be helping.
