Re: [PATCH 2/2] qdisc_restart - couple of optimizations.

2007-06-14 Thread Herbert Xu
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 02:10:49PM +0530, Krishna Kumar wrote:
 
 - BUG_ON((int) q-q.qlen  0) was a relic from old times when -1
   meant more packets are available, and __qdisc_run used to loop
   when qdisc_restart() returned -1. During those days, it was
   necessary to make sure that qlen is never less than zero, since
   __qdisc_run would get into an infinite loop if no packets are on
   the queue and this bug in qdisc was there (and worse - no more
   skbs could ever get queue'd as we hold the queue lock too). With
   Herbert's recent change to return values, this check is not
   required.  Hopefully Herbert can validate this change. If at all
   this is required, it should be added to skb_dequeue (in failure
   case), and not to qdisc_qlen.

Yes I agree that this check is no longer critical.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: [PATCH 2/2] qdisc_restart - couple of optimizations.

2007-06-14 Thread Herbert Xu
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 10:51:00AM -0700, Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote:
 
 I somewhat disagree here.  The underlying driver can conceivably stop
 the device queue even if the stack holds the queue lock during an
 interrupt to clean Tx descriptors, and it finds it's out of them or
 needs to grab the device for whatever reason.  Granted this is a corner
 case, and the net effect would be a simple requeue of the skb, but
 checking the status of the queue at the last possible moment before
 entering the driver could alleviate the requeue in the time between
 -dequeue() from the qdisc, and hard_start_xmit() if an event like I
 mentioned happened.

IMHO this scenario occurs so infrequently that the check isn't worth it
especially since the driver has to be able to deal with us calling it
after netif_stop_queue() anyway.

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [PATCH 2/2] qdisc_restart - couple of optimizations.

2007-06-14 Thread Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
 IMHO this scenario occurs so infrequently that the check 
 isn't worth it especially since the driver has to be able to 
 deal with us calling it after netif_stop_queue() anyway.

That sounds just fine to me.  Thanks Krishna and Herbert for weighing in
on this.

-PJ Waskiewicz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [PATCH 2/2] qdisc_restart - couple of optimizations.

2007-06-13 Thread Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
 - netif_queue_stopped need not be called inside qdisc_restart as
   it has been called already in qdisc_run() before the first skb
   is sent, and in __qdisc_run() after each intermediate skb is
   sent (note : we are the only sender, so the queue cannot get
   stopped while the tx lock was got in the ~LLTX case).

I somewhat disagree here.  The underlying driver can conceivably stop
the device queue even if the stack holds the queue lock during an
interrupt to clean Tx descriptors, and it finds it's out of them or
needs to grab the device for whatever reason.  Granted this is a corner
case, and the net effect would be a simple requeue of the skb, but
checking the status of the queue at the last possible moment before
entering the driver could alleviate the requeue in the time between
-dequeue() from the qdisc, and hard_start_xmit() if an event like I
mentioned happened.

I'm ok with it either way, especially since this is a corner case.  But
it does need to be considered that it can happen.

Cheers,

-PJ Waskiewicz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


RE: [PATCH 2/2] qdisc_restart - couple of optimizations.

2007-06-13 Thread Krishna Kumar2
Hi Peter,

Thanks for your feedback.

  - netif_queue_stopped need not be called inside qdisc_restart as
it has been called already in qdisc_run() before the first skb
is sent, and in __qdisc_run() after each intermediate skb is
sent (note : we are the only sender, so the queue cannot get
stopped while the tx lock was got in the ~LLTX case).

 I somewhat disagree here.  The underlying driver can conceivably stop
 the device queue even if the stack holds the queue lock during an
 interrupt to clean Tx descriptors, and it finds it's out of them or
 needs to grab the device for whatever reason.  Granted this is a corner
 case, and the net effect would be a simple requeue of the skb, but
 checking the status of the queue at the last possible moment before
 entering the driver could alleviate the requeue in the time between
 -dequeue() from the qdisc, and hard_start_xmit() if an event like I
 mentioned happened.

After seeing a few drivers, I understand that the rx intr (to clean
TX descriptors) can only enable the queue and not stop the queue (as
it will normally not queue any packets and only clean up the sent
ones). I don't find any way that the driver can stop the queue once
the top layer determines it is OK to send and is enqueing.

It is a wasted check for almost every packet (and IMHO opinion, for
every packet). And as you said - if a driver were written differently
to stop the queue even in the clean path, then that rare event (should
be very rare as we checked for stop_queue just a few instrutions
earlier) will result in a requeue, but the normal path is not penalized.

Thanks,

- KK

 I'm ok with it either way, especially since this is a corner case.  But
 it does need to be considered that it can happen.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html