Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] cls_flower: Various fixes
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 12:35 AM, Roi Dayan wrote: > > > On 03/06/2018 22:39, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> >> Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 08:33:25PM CEST, xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:17 AM, Paul Blakey wrote: Two of the fixes are for my multiple mask patch Paul Blakey (2): cls_flower: Fix missing free of rhashtable cls_flower: Fix comparing of old filter mask with new filter >>> >>> >>> Both are bug fixes and one-line fixes, so definitely should go >>> to -net tree and -stable tree. >> >> >> I agree. >> > > it's because the commit they fix doesn't exists in net yet. > Oh, sorry, my bad, I thought Apr 30 is in a previous release... Anyway, v2 should be applied cleanly to -net-next or -net after net-next is merged into it.
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] cls_flower: Various fixes
On 03/06/2018 22:39, Jiri Pirko wrote: Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 08:33:25PM CEST, xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:17 AM, Paul Blakey wrote: Two of the fixes are for my multiple mask patch Paul Blakey (2): cls_flower: Fix missing free of rhashtable cls_flower: Fix comparing of old filter mask with new filter Both are bug fixes and one-line fixes, so definitely should go to -net tree and -stable tree. I agree. it's because the commit they fix doesn't exists in net yet.
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] cls_flower: Various fixes
Sun, Jun 03, 2018 at 08:33:25PM CEST, xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com wrote: >On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:17 AM, Paul Blakey wrote: >> Two of the fixes are for my multiple mask patch >> >> Paul Blakey (2): >> cls_flower: Fix missing free of rhashtable >> cls_flower: Fix comparing of old filter mask with new filter > >Both are bug fixes and one-line fixes, so definitely should go >to -net tree and -stable tree. I agree.
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] cls_flower: Various fixes
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 1:17 AM, Paul Blakey wrote: > Two of the fixes are for my multiple mask patch > > Paul Blakey (2): > cls_flower: Fix missing free of rhashtable > cls_flower: Fix comparing of old filter mask with new filter Both are bug fixes and one-line fixes, so definitely should go to -net tree and -stable tree. I don't understand why you decide to rebase on net-next.
Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] cls_flower: Various fixes
From: Paul Blakey Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 11:17:36 +0300 > Two of the fixes are for my multiple mask patch This series doesn't apply cleanly to net-next. Please respin.
