Re: [PATCH net-next 20/20] net/bridge: Update br_mdb_dump for strict data checking

2018-10-05 Thread Christian Brauner
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 02:33:55PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> From: David Ahern 
> 
> Update br_mdb_dump for strict data checking. If the flag is set,
> the dump request is expected to have a br_port_msg struct as the
> header. All elements of the struct are expected to be 0 and no
> attributes can be appended.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Ahern 
> ---
>  net/bridge/br_mdb.c | 29 +
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_mdb.c b/net/bridge/br_mdb.c
> index a4a848bf827b..7b658d6c 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_mdb.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_mdb.c
> @@ -162,6 +162,28 @@ static int br_mdb_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
> netlink_callback *cb,
>   return err;
>  }
>  
> +static int br_mdb_valid_dump_req(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> +  struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + struct br_port_msg *bpm;
> +
> + if (nlh->nlmsg_len < nlmsg_msg_size(sizeof(*bpm))) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid header");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (bpm->ifindex) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack,
> +"Filtering by device index is not supported");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (nlh->nlmsg_len != nlmsg_msg_size(sizeof(*bpm))) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid data after header");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static int br_mdb_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
>  {
>   struct net_device *dev;
> @@ -169,6 +191,13 @@ static int br_mdb_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
> netlink_callback *cb)
>   struct nlmsghdr *nlh = NULL;
>   int idx = 0, s_idx;
>  
> + if (cb->strict_check) {
> + int err = br_mdb_valid_dump_req(cb->nlh, cb->extack);
> +
> + if (err)
> + return err;

Nit: unnecessarry newline :)

> + }
> +
>   s_idx = cb->args[0];
>  
>   rcu_read_lock();
> -- 
> 2.11.0
> 


Re: [PATCH net-next 20/20] net/bridge: Update br_mdb_dump for strict data checking

2018-10-05 Thread David Ahern
On 10/5/18 1:34 AM, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Ahern 
> Date: Thu,  4 Oct 2018 14:33:55 -0700
> 
>> @@ -162,6 +162,28 @@ static int br_mdb_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
>> netlink_callback *cb,
>>  return err;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static int br_mdb_valid_dump_req(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
>> + struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
>> +{
>> +struct br_port_msg *bpm;
>> +
>> +if (nlh->nlmsg_len < nlmsg_msg_size(sizeof(*bpm))) {
>> +NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid header");
>> +return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +if (bpm->ifindex) {
> 
> 'bpm' is never initialized.
> 

Thanks.

I had not updated the bridge command for strict checking. Doing so and
bridge mdb show generates a trace. Will fix.


Re: [PATCH net-next 20/20] net/bridge: Update br_mdb_dump for strict data checking

2018-10-05 Thread David Miller
From: David Ahern 
Date: Thu,  4 Oct 2018 14:33:55 -0700

> @@ -162,6 +162,28 @@ static int br_mdb_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct 
> netlink_callback *cb,
>   return err;
>  }
>  
> +static int br_mdb_valid_dump_req(const struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
> +  struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
> +{
> + struct br_port_msg *bpm;
> +
> + if (nlh->nlmsg_len < nlmsg_msg_size(sizeof(*bpm))) {
> + NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Invalid header");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + if (bpm->ifindex) {

'bpm' is never initialized.