Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 00/12] net: mvpp2: misc improvements and preparation patches

2017-02-21 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Hello,

On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:12:26 -0500 (EST), David Miller wrote:

> For your particular case I'll accept a resubmit.

Resubmit done, patches are now in patchwork. Changes since v3 (also in
the cover letter of v4) :

 - Addition of a patch "net: mvpp2: fix DMA address calculation in
   mvpp2_txq_inc_put()", which fixes a bug in the driver in the
   calculation of DMA addresses. This bug was found using
   DMA_API_DEBUG.

 - Modify the "net: mvpp2: switch to build_skb() in the RX path" patch
   to recalculate the fragment size when the MTU is changed in
   mvpp2_bm_update_mtu().

 - Added Acked-by from Russell King on all patches, except:

* "net: mvpp2: fix DMA address calculation in
  mvpp2_txq_inc_put()", because it's a new patch

* "net: mvpp2: switch to build_skb() in the RX path" because I
  modified it since the v3.

 - Rebased on top of 4.10.

Thanks!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com


Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 00/12] net: mvpp2: misc improvements and preparation patches

2017-02-20 Thread David Miller
From: Thomas Petazzoni 
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:47:41 +0100

> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:53:57 -0500 (EST), David Miller wrote:
> 
>> > This series has been on the list for a while, and has received review
>> > and a Acked-by. Would it be possible to merge it?  
>> 
>> You need to repost the series if it isn't in patchwork in state
>> "Under Review".
> 
> Is net-next still open? I.e can I resend today/tomorrow?

For your particular case I'll accept a resubmit.


Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 00/12] net: mvpp2: misc improvements and preparation patches

2017-02-20 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Hello,

On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:53:57 -0500 (EST), David Miller wrote:

> > This series has been on the list for a while, and has received review
> > and a Acked-by. Would it be possible to merge it?  
> 
> You need to repost the series if it isn't in patchwork in state
> "Under Review".

Is net-next still open? I.e can I resend today/tomorrow?

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com


Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 00/12] net: mvpp2: misc improvements and preparation patches

2017-02-20 Thread David Miller
From: Thomas Petazzoni 
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:07:42 +0100

> David,
> 
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 09:55:34 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> 
>> For the whole series:
>> 
>> Acked-by: Russell King 
> 
> This series has been on the list for a while, and has received review
> and a Acked-by. Would it be possible to merge it?

You need to repost the series if it isn't in patchwork in state
"Under Review".


Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 00/12] net: mvpp2: misc improvements and preparation patches

2017-02-20 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
David,

On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 09:55:34 +, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:

> For the whole series:
> 
> Acked-by: Russell King 

This series has been on the list for a while, and has received review
and a Acked-by. Would it be possible to merge it?

Thanks,

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com


Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 00/12] net: mvpp2: misc improvements and preparation patches

2017-02-09 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:51:29PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> David,
> 
> This series contains a number of misc improvements and preparation
> patches for an upcoming series that adds support for the new PPv2.2
> network controller to the mvpp2 driver.
> 
> Sorry for the long delay since v2, I was on
> vacation/conference/training in January, and therefore wasn't able to
> resend a new version earlier. Upcoming versions should arrive much
> faster, if there are further comments on this series.
> 
> The most significant improvements are:
> 
>  - Switching to using build_skb(), which is necessary for the upcoming
>PPv2.2 support, but anyway a good improvement to the current mvpp2
>driver (supporting PPv2.1).
> 
>  - Making the driver build on 64-bit platforms.
> 
> Changes since v2:
> 
>  - Fix remaining 64-bit build warning, reported by David Miller.
> 
>  - Adjust how bit mask related definitions are done in "net: mvpp2:
>simplify MVPP2_PRS_RI_* definitions" according to Russell King
>suggestions.
> 
>  - Add a patch "net: mvpp2: remove useless arguments in
>mvpp2_rx_{pkts,time}_coal_set", suggested by Russell King.
> 
>  - Rework mvpp2_rx_time_coal_set() implementation to avoid overflows
>and rounding errors. I've used the implementation suggested by
>Russell King.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> 
>  - This series is split as a separate series from the larger patch set
>adding support for PPv2.2 in the mvpp2 driver, as requested by
>David Miller.
> 
>  - Rebased on top of v4.10-rc1.

For the whole series:

Acked-by: Russell King 

Thanks.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.


Re: [PATCHv3 net-next 00/12] net: mvpp2: misc improvements and preparation patches

2017-02-09 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
David,

On Thu,  2 Feb 2017 16:51:29 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:

> This series contains a number of misc improvements and preparation
> patches for an upcoming series that adds support for the new PPv2.2
> network controller to the mvpp2 driver.

Since I haven't received any comment on this series (besides a
suggestion for a possible future improvement) and the kbuild robot
hasn't complained, would it be possible to get this series merged for
the next merge window ?

This way, we would be able to get these preliminary patches in 4.11,
and then the next patch series (PPv2.2) hopefully in 4.12.

Thanks a lot!

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com