Re: Request for -stable inclusion (xt_TCPMSS)
From: Guillaume NaultDate: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 09:45:17 +0200 > Hi David, > > Please queue 2638fd0f92d4 ("netfilter: xt_TCPMSS: add more sanity tests on > tcph->doff") > for -stable. > It fixes hard to debug crashes in production, that can be triggered by > remote peers. Pablo handles netfilter -stable submissions, so please ask him. Thank you.
Re: Request for -stable inclusion (xt_TCPMSS)
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 11:59:12AM +0200, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > Hi Guillaume, > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 09:45:17AM +0200, Guillaume Nault wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > Please queue 2638fd0f92d4 ("netfilter: xt_TCPMSS: add more sanity tests on > > tcph->doff") > > for -stable. > > It fixes hard to debug crashes in production, that can be triggered by > > remote peers. > > What stable kernels you want this in? Does this apply cleanly to them > all? > I need it (and reviewed/tested it) for 4.9. But the patch applies cleanly and looks necessary for all stable versions >= 3.16 (not tested though). > I can route this for you directly to sta...@vger.kernel.org once we > sort out these questions. > > Thanks! Great, thanks Pablo. But do you mean I should have Cc-ed sta...@vger.kernel.org directly?
Re: Request for -stable inclusion (xt_TCPMSS)
Hi Guillaume, On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 09:45:17AM +0200, Guillaume Nault wrote: > Hi David, > > Please queue 2638fd0f92d4 ("netfilter: xt_TCPMSS: add more sanity tests on > tcph->doff") > for -stable. > It fixes hard to debug crashes in production, that can be triggered by > remote peers. What stable kernels you want this in? Does this apply cleanly to them all? I can route this for you directly to sta...@vger.kernel.org once we sort out these questions. Thanks!