Re: Wifi support for iproute2
Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Don't waste your time with a tool that uses the exist wext API. > But a tool that could use cfg80211 would be useful. After the wireless > summit in Jan, I put it on my "interesting ideas" list. Ok. I would be happy if anyone will notify me when this is available without going too far from a mainstream kernel. Stephan pgprkOl3SjAmX.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Wifi support for iproute2
On Sun, 2007-03-04 at 02:26 +0100, Stephan Maka wrote: > Everyone told me dscape is near, but I hope iwlib will be ported then. Just a few short notes to add to Stephen's reply. dscape (or mac80211 now, it's been renamed) is going to migrate away from wireless extensions, in fact, wext is going to loom in the "backward compatibility" corner. That's quite some time off, but there's no point in writing new tools for it anyway. Within the kernel, cfg80211 is (hopefully!) going to replace wext, with the main userspace API being nl80211 (but some sysfs stuff too.) If you look at http://git.sipsolutions.net/pynl80211.git/ (usable as both a git and gitweb url) you'll find a python nl80211 tool I hacked up for some basic stuff to configure things via nl80211. Most of that doesn't actually work yet, of course, since mac80211 still uses wext internally, but as soon as we get enough manpower that'll change. johannes signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Wifi support for iproute2
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007 02:26:53 +0100 Stephan Maka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello > > I've always felt uncomfortable by the usability of the wireless-tools > (iwconfig, iwlist), but I really love iproute2. That's why I started > to implement "ip wifi". > > My GIT tree is located at: > http://cthulhu.c3d2.de/~astro/git/iproute2.git/ > > I wonder if this has a chance to get merged in iproute2 somewhen at > all, or if this is completely inappropriate functionality for this > tool. > > Note that this my first contribution to a Linux-specific tool, *any* > hints about style and conventions demanded here are welcome. > > I'm sure not everyone will use this instead of wireless-tools, and a > few even don't want it compiled in and linked with iwlib. Should I > make this optional through a Makefile variable? > > If noone else contributes not all of wireless-tools will be > implemented, it's just too much. But basic stuff for configuring a > Wifi card is already there. > > Everyone told me dscape is near, but I hope iwlib will be ported then. Don't waste your time with a tool that uses the exist wext API. But a tool that could use cfg80211 would be useful. After the wireless summit in Jan, I put it on my "interesting ideas" list. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Wifi support for iproute2
Hello I've always felt uncomfortable by the usability of the wireless-tools (iwconfig, iwlist), but I really love iproute2. That's why I started to implement "ip wifi". My GIT tree is located at: http://cthulhu.c3d2.de/~astro/git/iproute2.git/ I wonder if this has a chance to get merged in iproute2 somewhen at all, or if this is completely inappropriate functionality for this tool. Note that this my first contribution to a Linux-specific tool, *any* hints about style and conventions demanded here are welcome. I'm sure not everyone will use this instead of wireless-tools, and a few even don't want it compiled in and linked with iwlib. Should I make this optional through a Makefile variable? If noone else contributes not all of wireless-tools will be implemented, it's just too much. But basic stuff for configuring a Wifi card is already there. Everyone told me dscape is near, but I hope iwlib will be ported then. Stephan pgpmNPtS32xU9.pgp Description: PGP signature
