Re: r8169 ethernet bonding problems

2007-06-18 Thread Francois Romieu
Tim Durack [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[snip]

Can you try 2.6.22-rc5 +
http://www.fr.zoreil.com/people/francois/misc/20070619-2.6.22-rc5-r8169-test.patch

It does not seem to work too bad here (tested with 2.6.22-rc5 + patch):

# grep bonding /etc/modprobe.conf
alias bond0 bonding
options bonding miimon=1000 mode=balance-rr

$ dmesg
[0.00] Linux version 2.6.22-rc5 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.1 
20070105 (Red Hat 4.1.1-51)) #9 Tue Jun 19 00:19:24 CEST 2007
[...]
[   35.516210] r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.2LK-NAPI loaded
[   35.516251] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :01:00.0[A] - GSI 17 (level, low) - 
IRQ 17
[   35.516279] PCI: Setting latency timer of device :01:00.0 to 64
[   35.516632] eth0: RTL8168b/8111b at 0xf8a08000, 00:13:8f:ea:b1:5d, XID 
3800 IRQ 17
[   35.523173] r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.2LK-NAPI loaded
[   35.523204] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :03:01.0[A] - GSI 22 (level, low) - 
IRQ 20
[   35.523473] eth1: RTL8110s at 0xf8a0a800, 00:09:5b:bd:c1:a5, XID 0400 
IRQ 20
[   35.526654] r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.2LK-NAPI loaded
[   35.526683] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :03:02.0[A] - GSI 23 (level, low) - 
IRQ 21
[   35.526940] eth2: RTL8110s at 0xf8a0cc00, 00:09:5b:bd:c1:a5, XID 0400 
IRQ 21
[   35.581378] USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver v3.0
[   35.582010] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:1d.0[A] - GSI 23 (level, low) - 
IRQ 21
[   35.582028] PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:1d.0 to 64
[...]
[   46.300540] Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.1.2 (January 20, 2007)
[   46.307134] bonding: MII link monitoring set to 1000 ms
[   50.515819] r8169: eth1: link up
[   50.519218] r8169: eth1: link up
[   50.539460] bonding: bond0: enslaving eth1 as an active interface with an up 
link.
[   50.656913] r8169: eth2: link up
[   50.660296] r8169: eth2: link up
[   50.679294] bonding: bond0: enslaving eth2 as an active interface with an up 
link.

$ ifconfig
bond0 Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:09:5B:BD:C1:A5
  inet addr:192.168.1.3  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
  inet6 addr: fe80::209:5bff:febd:c1a5/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:319 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:329 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:31583 (30.8 KiB)  TX bytes:30884 (30.1 KiB)

eth1  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:09:5B:BD:C1:A5
  inet6 addr: fe80::209:5bff:febd:c1a5/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:158 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:165 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:16228 (15.8 KiB)  TX bytes:15418 (15.0 KiB)
  Interrupt:20 Base address:0xa800

eth2  Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:09:5B:BD:C1:A5
  inet6 addr: fe80::209:5bff:febd:c1a5/64 Scope:Link
  UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
  RX packets:161 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:164 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
  RX bytes:15355 (14.9 KiB)  TX bytes:15466 (15.1 KiB)
  Interrupt:21 Base address:0xcc00

loLink encap:Local Loopback
  inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
  inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
  UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
  RX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
  TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
  collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
  RX bytes:560 (560.0 b)  TX bytes:560 (560.0 b)

# ethtool -S eth1
NIC statistics:
 tx_packets: 205
 rx_packets: 195
 tx_errors: 0
 rx_errors: 0
 rx_missed: 0
 align_errors: 0
 tx_single_collisions: 0
 tx_multi_collisions: 0
 unicast: 192
 broadcast: 1
 multicast: 2
 tx_aborted: 0
 tx_underrun: 0

# ethtool -S eth2
NIC statistics:
 tx_packets: 205
 rx_packets: 198
 tx_errors: 0
 rx_errors: 0
 rx_missed: 0
 align_errors: 0
 tx_single_collisions: 0
 tx_multi_collisions: 0
 unicast: 195
 broadcast: 2
 multicast: 1
 tx_aborted: 0
 tx_underrun: 0

Let's play gently with the cables:

PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.276 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.184 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.195 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.173 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.212 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=6 ttl=64 time=0.173 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=7 ttl=64 time=0.198 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=8 ttl=64 time=0.173 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=9 ttl=64 time=0.200 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=10 

Re: r8169 ethernet bonding problems

2007-05-02 Thread Tim Durack

 Yup. Works fine. The randomly changing interface order is proving to
 be a challenge!

udev should be your friend to do a BUS/ID based rename.


True, but so far I have to force link addrs, force promisc mode, and
now add a udev work-around ;-|

Strange thing is, when the interfaces get initialised as eth0/1/2 in
order, they all have the correct macs. When they appear out of order
(eth5/1/2, eth5/6/1 etc), at least one or more of the macs are messed
up.

Once yesterday I saw them initialise in order, with correct macs. Have
not been able to repeat or figure out if there is some way of
triggering this correct behaviour.

Any more driver patches I can beta test?

Tim:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: r8169 ethernet bonding problems

2007-05-02 Thread Tim Durack

On 5/2/07, Tim Durack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Yup. Works fine. The randomly changing interface order is proving to
  be a challenge!

 udev should be your friend to do a BUS/ID based rename.


Okay, the udev workaround isn't too painful.

Would be great if I could do something like
ATTRS{address}=00:30:18:ab:cd:ef and have that force the mac during
initialisation.

Tim:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: r8169 ethernet bonding problems

2007-05-01 Thread Tim Durack

A tcpdump trace 1) before promiscuous mode 2) after promiscuous mode 3)
after link failure (i.e. failover does not work) would be welcome.


Okay, after fixing STP forwarding delays on the switch, bonding
failover now works, as long as member links are forced to promisc
mode.

Still Have a problem with links randomly failing to achieve link on
boot. This then requires a modprobe -r r8169; modprobe r8169 cycle
to get link. Side effect is the mac address corruption I have
described previously.

Tim:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: r8169 ethernet bonding problems

2007-05-01 Thread Francois Romieu
Tim Durack [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
 Still Have a problem with links randomly failing to achieve link on
 boot. This then requires a modprobe -r r8169; modprobe r8169 cycle
 to get link. Side effect is the mac address corruption I have
 described previously.

Can you try to set the MAC address by hand with the completely patched
kernel (i.e. including the mac-address-change patch) ?

Given the last report in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6032,
it should be straightforward with your Debian system.

No clear idea why your three cards are not handled the same though.

-- 
Ueimor

Anybody got a battery for my Ultra 10 ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: r8169 ethernet bonding problems

2007-05-01 Thread Tim Durack

Can you try to set the MAC address by hand with the completely patched
kernel (i.e. including the mac-address-change patch) ?


Yup. Works fine. The randomly changing interface order is proving to
be a challenge!


Given the last report in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6032,
it should be straightforward with your Debian system.

No clear idea why your three cards are not handled the same though.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: r8169 ethernet bonding problems

2007-05-01 Thread Francois Romieu
Tim Durack [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
 Can you try to set the MAC address by hand with the completely patched
 kernel (i.e. including the mac-address-change patch) ?
 
 Yup. Works fine. The randomly changing interface order is proving to
 be a challenge!

udev should be your friend to do a BUS/ID based rename.

-- 
Ueimor

Anybody got a battery for my Ultra 10 ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: r8169 ethernet bonding problems

2007-04-30 Thread Tim Durack

Can you revert patch #0012 and see if it changes this part of the problem ?


Reverted. mac is still wrong - I assume the eprom got corrupted somehow.

~# modprobe r8169
r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.2LK-NAPI loaded
ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:09.0[A] - GSI 18 (level, low) - IRQ 16
eth1: RTL8169sc/8110sc at 0xf8838000, 00:00:00:00:68:93, IRQ 16
r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.2LK-NAPI loaded
ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:0b.0[A] - GSI 19 (level, low) - IRQ 17
eth2: RTL8169sc/8110sc at 0xf883a000, 00:30:18:ab:68:94, IRQ 17
r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.2LK-NAPI loaded
ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:0c.0[A] - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 18
eth4: RTL8169sc/8110sc at 0xf8a76000, 00:30:18:ab:68:95, IRQ 18

I can work around this with an ip links set dev eth5 addr for now.

Strange things is, this group of interfaces used to get initialised as
eth0/1/2, in sequence. Now one of the interfaces is always out of
order.


A tcpdump trace 1) before promiscuous mode 2) after promiscuous mode 3)
after link failure (i.e. failover does not work) would be welcome.


Will get these shortly.

lspci -vx:

00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. CN700/VN800/P4M800CE/Pro Host Bridge
Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. CN700/VN800/P4M800CE/Pro Host Bridge
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 8
Memory at e800 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M]
Capabilities: [80] AGP version 3.5
Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2
00: 06 11 14 03 06 00 30 22 00 00 00 06 00 08 80 00
10: 08 00 00 e8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 06 11 14 03
30: 00 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

00:00.1 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. CN700/VN800/P4M800CE/Pro Host Bridge
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0
00: 06 11 14 13 06 00 00 02 00 00 00 06 00 00 00 00
10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

00:00.2 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. CN700/VN800/P4M800CE/Pro Host Bridge
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0
00: 06 11 14 23 06 00 00 02 00 00 00 06 00 00 00 00
10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

00:00.3 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. PT890 Host Bridge
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0
00: 06 11 08 32 06 00 00 02 00 00 00 06 00 00 00 00
10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

00:00.4 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. CN700/VN800/P4M800CE/Pro Host Bridge
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0
00: 06 11 14 43 06 00 00 02 00 00 00 06 00 00 00 00
10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
30: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

00:00.7 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. CN700/VN800/P4M800CE/Pro Host Bridge
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0
00: 06 11 14 73 06 00 00 02 00 00 00 06 00 00 00 00
10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
30: 00 00 00 00 a0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00

00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 PCI Bridge (prog-if
00 [Normal decode])
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 0
Bus: primary=00, secondary=01, subordinate=01, sec-latency=0
I/O behind bridge: d000-dfff
Memory behind bridge: fb00-fcff
Prefetchable memory behind bridge: f400-f7ff
Capabilities: [70] Power Management version 2
00: 06 11 98 b1 07 00 30 02 00 00 04 06 00 00 01 00
10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 00 d0 d0 20 e2
20: 00 fb f0 fc 00 f4 f0 f7 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
30: 00 00 00 00 70 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 00

00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169
Gigabit Ethernet (rev 10)
Subsystem: Jetway Information Co., Ltd. Unknown device 10ec
Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 16
I/O ports at f200 [size=256]
Memory at fdfff000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256]
[virtual] Expansion ROM at 4000 [disabled] [size=64K]
Capabilities: [dc] Power Management version 2
00: ec 10 69 81 17 00 b0 02 10 00 00 02 08 40 00 00
10: 01 f2 00 00 00 f0 ff fd 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f3 16 ec 10
30: 00 00 00 00 dc 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0b 01 20 40

00:0a.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): VIA Technologies, Inc. IEEE 1394 Host
Controller (rev 80) (prog-if 10 [OHCI])
Subsystem: VIA Technologies, Inc. IEEE 1394 Host Controller
Flags: bus master, stepping, medium devsel, latency 32, IRQ 17
Memory at fdffe000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=2K]

Re: r8169 ethernet bonding problems

2007-04-30 Thread Tim Durack

A tcpdump trace 1) before promiscuous mode 2) after promiscuous mode 3)
after link failure (i.e. failover does not work) would be welcome.


See attached. Captures performed on bond0. Let me know if you prefer
captures against the physical member interfaces.

Tim:


promisc-off.pcap
Description: Binary data


promisc-on.pcap
Description: Binary data


fail-eth1.pcap
Description: Binary data


recover-eth1-1.pcap
Description: Binary data


fail-eth2-1.pcap
Description: Binary data


recover-eth2.pcap
Description: Binary data


Re: r8169 ethernet bonding problems

2007-04-30 Thread Tim Durack

On 4/30/07, Tim Durack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 A tcpdump trace 1) before promiscuous mode 2) after promiscuous mode 3)
 after link failure (i.e. failover does not work) would be welcome.

See attached. Captures performed on bond0. Let me know if you prefer
captures against the physical member interfaces.


Hmm, see attached files with content this time.


promisc-off.pcap
Description: Binary data


promisc-on.pcap
Description: Binary data


fail-eth1.pcap
Description: Binary data


recover-eth1.pcap
Description: Binary data


fail-eth2.pcap
Description: Binary data


recover-eth2.pcap
Description: Binary data


Re: r8169 ethernet bonding problems

2007-04-27 Thread Tim Durack

See:
http://www.fr.zoreil.com/linux/kernel/2.6.x/2.6.21-rc7/

Please Cc: netdev on success/failure.


Applied suggested patchset to vanilla 2.6.21.

Compiled using .config from linux-image-2.6.21-rc7 pulled down from
http://kernel-archive.buildserver.net/debian-kernel

Compiles, boots.

Bonding does not work reliably. Simple config:

#auto bond0
iface bond0 inet manual
 up ip link set dev $IFACE up
 up echo +eth1  /sys/class/net/$IFACE/bonding/slaves
 up echo +eth2  /sys/class/net/$IFACE/bonding/slaves
 up ip link set dev eth1 up
 up ip link set dev eth2 up
 up ip addr add 172.21.255.5/29 dev $IFACE
 down ip addr del 172.21.255.5/29 dev $IFACE
 down ip link set dev eth2 down
 down ip link set dev eth1 down
 down echo -eth2  /sys/class/net/$IFACE/bonding/slaves
 down echo -eth1  /sys/class/net/$IFACE/bonding/slaves
 down ip link set dev $IFACE down

Bond comes up, cannot ping unless I manually force promisc on both member links:

ip link set dev eth1 promisc on
ip link set dev eth2 promisc off

Link failover does not work reliably. Carrier-detect appears to be
working, so I don't think that is an issue.


A disturbing problem is mac corruption after modprobe -r r8169; modprobe r8169

ip link sh:

2: eth5: BROADCAST,MULTICAST mtu 1500 qdisc noop qlen 1000
   link/ether 00:00:00:00:68:93 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: eth1: BROADCAST,MULTICAST mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
   link/ether 00:30:18:ab:68:94 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
4: eth2: BROADCAST,MULTICAST mtu 1500 qdisc noop qlen 1000
   link/ether 00:30:18:ab:68:95 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff

eth5 mac was 00:30:18:ab:68:93 before the modprobe.

Not sure what's going on here, but I'm starting to think these
interfaces aren't the best in the world...

Tim:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: r8169 ethernet bonding problems

2007-04-27 Thread Jay Vosburgh
Tim Durack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[...]
Bond comes up, cannot ping unless I manually force promisc on both member 
links:

ip link set dev eth1 promisc on
ip link set dev eth2 promisc off

From looking at the source code for r8169, but it appears that
the r8169 driver only reads the device MAC address at probe time, and
doesn't propogate changes to the MAC out to the device.  That might
explain the promisc problem if the device also does MAC filtering.  Am
I missing something in the driver?

I don't actually have one of these to test with, I'm just
looking at the source and observing that dev_addr is only ever
referenced in the probe function, and that's only to read in the MAC
from the device.

-J

---
-Jay Vosburgh, IBM Linux Technology Center, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: r8169 ethernet bonding problems

2007-04-27 Thread Tim Durack

ip link set dev eth1 promisc on
ip link set dev eth2 promisc off


typo, ip link set dev eth2 promisc on of course



   From looking at the source code for r8169, but it appears that
the r8169 driver only reads the device MAC address at probe time, and
doesn't propogate changes to the MAC out to the device.  That might
explain the promisc problem if the device also does MAC filtering.  Am
I missing something in the driver?


I have applied all patches from the set, including:

0012-r8169-mac-address-change-support.patch

which I assume adds the ability to reprogram MAC filtering.

Behaviour indicates the MAC filter doesn't get reprogrammed though.


   I don't actually have one of these to test with, I'm just
looking at the source and observing that dev_addr is only ever
referenced in the probe function, and that's only to read in the MAC
from the device.


You're not missing much, believe me :-|

Tim:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: r8169 ethernet bonding problems

2007-04-27 Thread Francois Romieu
Tim Durack [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
 Link failover does not work reliably. Carrier-detect appears to be
 working, so I don't think that is an issue.
 
 
 A disturbing problem is mac corruption after modprobe -r r8169; modprobe 
 r8169
 
 ip link sh:
 
 2: eth5: BROADCAST,MULTICAST mtu 1500 qdisc noop qlen 1000
link/ether 00:00:00:00:68:93 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
 3: eth1: BROADCAST,MULTICAST mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether 00:30:18:ab:68:94 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
 4: eth2: BROADCAST,MULTICAST mtu 1500 qdisc noop qlen 1000
link/ether 00:30:18:ab:68:95 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
 
 eth5 mac was 00:30:18:ab:68:93 before the modprobe.

Can you revert patch #0012 and see if it changes this part of the problem ?

A tcpdump trace 1) before promiscuous mode 2) after promiscuous mode 3)
after link failure (i.e. failover does not work) would be welcome.

 Not sure what's going on here, but I'm starting to think these
 interfaces aren't the best in the world...

The maintainer/driver/hardware combination is a bit quirky at times
but it does not work too bad. :o)

-- 
Ueimor

Anybody got a battery for my Ultra 10 ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Re: r8169 ethernet bonding problems

2007-04-27 Thread Francois Romieu
Francois Romieu [EMAIL PROTECTED] :
[...]
 A tcpdump trace 1) before promiscuous mode 2) after promiscuous mode 3)
 after link failure (i.e. failover does not work) would be welcome.

A 'lspci -vx' will be needed too. There are different kinds of 8169.

-- 
Ueimor

Anybody got a battery for my Ultra 10 ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html