Re: [netmod] Some questions about "draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-13"

[Clyde Wildes (cwildes)]

Hi Zhangjun, Walker,

Please note that the most recent version of the draft is revision 15.

We have strived to provide a model that meets the minimum requirements for 
successful implementation by multiple vendors with the caveat that a feature 
that is only implemented by a single vendor can best be handled through model 
augmentation by that vendor. Destination VRF is an example that could be added 
through model augmentation.

Regarding your question about DNS: are you asking if the address leaf which is 
defined as “type inet:host” be a hostname that can be translated through DNS to 
an IP address? If so, the answer is yes.

TLS was added as a destination transport choice in revision 14 of the draft.

Regards,

Clyde

From: "Zhengguangying (Walker)" 
Date: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at 11:25 PM
To: "Clyde Wildes (cwildes)" , 
"kirankoushik.agraharasreeniv...@verizonwireless.com" 

Cc: "netmod@ietf.org" , "Zhangjun (Echo, CSD)" 

Subject: Some questions about "draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-13"

Hi all,


I have read the “draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-13”,  we have some comments 
want to discuss with you all,

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-13


  1.  Because the destination may be in VRF, in the definition of list 
destination, there should add the vrf attribute
  2.  Whether “DNS “ should be one case of transport?
  3.  The tls case should be concerned

Please help to confirm these comments, thanks

Regards
Zhangjun, Walker

[cid:image001.png@01D2F00B.F3D31850]
[cid:image002.png@01D2F00B.F3D31850]
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

[netmod] Some questions about "draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-13"

[Zhengguangying (Walker)]

Hi all,


I have read the "draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-13",  we have some comments 
want to discuss with you all,

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-13


1.  Because the destination may be in VRF, in the definition of list 
destination, there should add the vrf attribute

2.  Whether "DNS " should be one case of transport?

3.  The tls case should be concerned

Please help to confirm these comments, thanks

Regards
Zhangjun, Walker

[cid:image002.png@01D2EFFF.37F02670]
[cid:image003.png@01D2EFFF.37F02670]
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod