Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-06

[mohamed.boucadair]

Hi all,

I support.

Cheers,
Med

De : netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Kent Watsen
Envoyé : lundi 7 décembre 2020 23:33
À : netmod@ietf.org
Objet : [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-06

This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:

  https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-06

Please voice your support or technical objections on list before the end of 
December 21, any time zone.

Thank you!

NETMOD Chairs


_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10

[Xufeng Liu]

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Thanks,
- Xufeng

On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 9:46 PM Alexander Clemm  wrote:

> As a contributor:
>
> No, I’m not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft
>
> Cheers
>
> --- Alex
>
>
>
> *From:* netmod  *On Behalf Of *Igor Bryskin
> *Sent:* Monday, December 7, 2020 3:02 PM
> *To:* Qin Wu ; Henk Birkholz <
> henk.birkh...@sit.fraunhofer.de>; Xufeng Liu ;
> Benoit Claise ; Lou Berger 
> *Cc:* NetMod WG Chairs ; NetMod WG <
> netmod@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10
>
>
>
> No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Igor
>
> Get Outlook for Android
> 
>
>
> --
>
> *From:* Lou Berger 
> *Sent:* Monday, December 7, 2020 5:19:34 PM
> *To:* Qin Wu ; Igor Bryskin ;
> Henk Birkholz ; Xufeng Liu <
> xufeng.liu.i...@gmail.com>; Benoit Claise 
> *Cc:* NetMod WG Chairs ; NetMod WG <
> netmod@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* Fwd: Regarding IPR on draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10
>
>
>
> Authors,
>
> My apologies -- I failed to cc the WG on this.  Can you please
> re-reply so that your response make it into the WG archive.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Lou
>
>
>  Forwarded Message 
>
> *Subject: *
>
> Regarding IPR on draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10
>
> *Date: *
>
> Mon, 23 Nov 2020 18:08:59 -0500
>
> *From: *
>
> Lou Berger  
>
> *To: *
>
> Qin Wu  , Igor Bryskin
>  , Henk Birkholz
>  ,
> Xufeng Liu  ,
> Benoit Claise  
>
> *CC: *
>
> NetMod WG Chairs  
>
>
>
> Authors,
>
> Per the 109 session, it is the chairs intent to do another adoption call
> on this draft. In preparation for that, we’ve determined both that the
> draft has changed significantly and that there is a new author, and
> therefore feel it necessary to issue another IPR call, as follows:
>
>
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of preparation for WG Adoption:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> We note that all DT members are listed as contributors. If you
> contributed to the document please respond. Alternatively, please feel
> free to state that you didn't materially contribute to the draft and
> would like your name removed from the contribution section (and moved to
> acknowledgments after WG adoption).
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author.
>
> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty
> 
> .
>
> Thank you,
> NETMOD WG Chairs
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10

[Adrian Farrel]

Hi,

I have generally been sceptical about Intention-based network operations within 
the IETF, and I was ambivalent about this document at the first adoption poll. 

However, I think that some good work has been done since then and the document 
has reached a level where the WG could adopt it and further refine it. There is 
clearly a body of people who want to work on it, and it seems to be within the 
WG scope, so I support adoption.

I also think that splitting this piece off the larger body of Intention-based 
work is a wise first step.

Here are a few comments for the authors based on a quick reading...

Abstract.
I appreciate the brevity of the Abstract, but I don't find it very clear. 
Specifically, what is "the server" and what role would it play absent this YANG 
model? Conversely, who/what is delegating some of the network management 
functions? And lastly, is the choice of which network management functions to 
delegate well known (I assume it is) or up to an implementation?

---

Introduction
The first mention of "ECA" comes in...
   This document defines an ECA Policy management YANG data model.
I think you need to:
- Expand the abbreviation
- Explain in one or two sentences what ECA is

---

Section 2.1
You need to update to the more recent boilerplate that mentions RFC 8174

---

Section 2.1
You use the term "Event Stream" without defining it

Cheers,
Adrian

-Original Message-
From: netmod  On Behalf Of Lou Berger
Sent: 07 December 2020 22:28
To: NETMOD Group 
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs 
Subject: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10

This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10

Please voice your support or technical objections on list before the end 
of December 21, any time zone.

Thank you!

Netmod Chairs

PS Note the IPR poll is running concurrently as the private response all 
indicated that no IPR exists.  The draft will not be formally adopted 
until both the IPR and WG polls are complete.


___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10

[Jan Lindblad]

I support adoption.
/jan

> On 7 Dec 2020, at 23:27, Lou Berger  wrote:
> 
> This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10
> 
> Please voice your support or technical objections on list before the end of 
> December 21, any time zone.
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Netmod Chairs
> 
> PS Note the IPR poll is running concurrently as the private response all 
> indicated that no IPR exists.  The draft will not be formally adopted until 
> both the IPR and WG polls are complete.
> 
> 
> ___
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod