Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-05
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Thanks, Rob -Original Message- From: Lou Berger Sent: 31 January 2022 21:54 To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) ; res...@yahoo.com; Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; balazs.leng...@ericsson.com; jason.ste...@nokia.com Cc: NetMod WG ; NetMod WG Chairs Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-05 Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of WG Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. Thank you, Lou (Co-Chair) PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response. ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-06
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Thanks, Rob -Original Message- From: Lou Berger Sent: 31 January 2022 21:57 To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) ; Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; res...@yahoo.com; balazs.leng...@ericsson.com; jason.ste...@nokia.com; benoit.cla...@huawei.com Cc: NetMod WG ; NetMod WG Chairs Subject: Regarding IPR on Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-06 Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of WG Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. Thank you, Lou (Co-Chair) PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response. ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-05
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Joe On 1/31/22 16:54, Lou Berger wrote: > > Authors, Contributors, WG, > > As part of WG Last Call: > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > If yes to the above, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor > please answer the > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are > aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next > stage until a response has been received from each author. > > NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed > as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under > the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are > aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from > participating in any contribution or discussion related to your > undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above > and > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > > Thank you, > Lou (Co-Chair) > > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your > response. > > > ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-06
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Joe On 1/31/22 16:57, Lou Berger wrote: > > Authors, Contributors, WG, > > As part of WG Last Call: > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > If yes to the above, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor > please answer the > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are > aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next > stage until a response has been received from each author. > > NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed > as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under > the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are > aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from > participating in any contribution or discussion related to your > undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above > and > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > > Thank you, > Lou (Co-Chair) > > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your > response. > > > ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
[netmod] YANG Versioning Weekly Call Minutes - 2022-02-01
YANG Versioning Weekly Call Minutes - 2022-02-01 - Reviewed PR 127 for issue #74 items (a) and (c) - schema terminology. Jason to fold PR into latest. - Reviewed Jan's text for issue #70 - deviations in packages. Jan to create a PR. - Reviewed Jason's text for issue #74 item (k) - pre-release package versions. Jason to see if other open items in issue #74 can be folded in to a PR with item (k). - Continued discussions of mount points in packages (Issue #57). Should we have an 'optional' flag in the mounted packages ? We'll try to continue working through some of the smaller issues in parallel with mount points. if people can continue progress on those it would be great. We need volunteers to drive #29 and #32 below. Open Actions: -- Balazs: #65: (revision label scheme for Packages) Reshad: #63: (Precedence of packages in Package definition) Bo: #105 and #125 (remove some things, update some terms) Jan: #70 (and close off #67/#69 in GitHub) #74: Jason #30: Jason #29: (package deviation example) - looking for someone to own this one (propose text) #32: (what does metadata mean) - looking for someone to own this one (propose text) #64: Jason #66: Jason #76: Reshad to refresh on this and we'll discuss in future meetings #97: (submodules) Jason -- Versioning work on Github: https://github.com/netmod-wg/yang-ver-dt -- Weekly webex call details: Meeting number (access code): 161 096 5630 Meeting password: semver? Occurs every Tuesday effective Tuesday, November 16, 2021 from 9:00 AM to 10:00 AM, (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) 9:00 AM | (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) | 1 hr https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=me2c6491ebcc37b8127c1244d244d2754 Tap to join from a mobile device (attendees only) +1-650-479-3208,,1610965630## Call-in toll number (US/Canada) ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-06
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Regards, Jason > -Original Message- > From: Lou Berger > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 4:57 PM > To: jcla...@cisco.com; rwil...@cisco.com; res...@yahoo.com; > balazs.leng...@ericsson.com; Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) > ; benoit.cla...@huawei.com > Cc: NetMod WG ; NetMod WG Chairs cha...@ietf.org> > Subject: Regarding IPR on Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-06 > > > > Authors, Contributors, WG, > > As part of WG Last Call: > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > If yes to the above, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor > please answer the > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are > aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next > stage until a response has been received from each author. > > NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed > as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under > the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are > aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from > participating in any contribution or discussion related to your > undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above > and > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > > Thank you, > Lou (Co-Chair) > > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your > response. > ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-05
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" Regards, Jason > -Original Message- > From: Lou Berger > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 4:54 PM > To: jcla...@cisco.com; res...@yahoo.com; rwil...@cisco.com; > balazs.leng...@ericsson.com; Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) > > Cc: NetMod WG ; NetMod WG Chairs cha...@ietf.org> > Subject: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-05 > > > > Authors, Contributors, WG, > > As part of WG Last Call: > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > If yes to the above, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor > please answer the > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are > aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next > stage until a response has been received from each author. > > NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed > as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under > the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are > aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from > participating in any contribution or discussion related to your > undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above > and > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > > Thank you, > Lou (Co-Chair) > > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your > response. > ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-05
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. On Monday, January 31, 2022, 04:54:15 PM EST, Lou Berger wrote: Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of WG Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. Thank you, Lou (Co-Chair) PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response. ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver-06
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. On Monday, January 31, 2022, 04:57:24 PM EST, Lou Berger wrote: Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of WG Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. Thank you, Lou (Co-Chair) PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response. ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] YANG 'when' with absolute path
On 28/01/2022 12:12, Italo Busi wrote: The YANG code is correct (at least it passes pyang validation) but it fails yanglint validation just because yanglint does not support axes, so we expect that as soon as we upload the updated draft, the IETF datatracker will signal yang validation errors Is there any guideline/suggestion from Netmod WG and YANG doctors on how to deal with such a case? I do not believe a deficiency in one tool should hold back publication. Tools are updated more easily than SDO documents after all and one would hope this will create a bit of an incentive to fix the tool. Regards, Robert OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
