Hi,
Jernej Tuljak wrote:
> Hi,
>
> am I reading RFC8340 correctly by assuming "input" and "output" nodes
> are not to be part of tree diagrams and that instead input/output
> parameters are now children to the "rpc" or "action" node,
> distinguished solely via -w/ro flags?
I hope not, or that was not the intention anyway.
> rpcs:
> +---x get-schema
> +---w identifier! string
> +---w version? string
> +---w format? identityref
> +--ro data?
pyang outputs
+---x get-schema
+---w input
| +---w identifierstring
| +---w version? string
| +---w format? identityref
+--ro output
+--ro data?
> Only "input parameters" and "output parameters" are mentioned, which
> seems to suggest data node children of "input" and "output", but not
> themselves. It also says nothing about which flag they receive, if
> they are intended to appear.
Yes I can see how this could be clarified.
/martin
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
