Re: [netmod] [Rtg-yang-coord] Requirements for I2RS protocol and I2RS interim (6/24/2015 at 10:00 - 11:30am ET)

2015-07-02 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani

 On Jun 30, 2015, at 3:13 PM, Eric Voit (evoit) ev...@cisco.com wrote:
 
 What might be interesting for a NETCONF speaking slot is an analysis of what 
 requirements from “draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements” are met by 
 “draft-clemm-netconf-yang-push”. 

Susan or somebody from i2rs WG can decide whether the suggested presentation 
would help clarify i2rs requirements to NETCONF. From a personal perspective it 
would certainly help to have examples of how the requirements could be met.

Cheers.

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanand...@gmail.com



___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


Re: [netmod] [Rtg-yang-coord] Requirements for I2RS protocol and I2RS interim (6/24/2015 at 10:00 - 11:30am ET)

2015-07-01 Thread BELOTTI, SERGIO (SERGIO)
Hello Susan,
-  Topology model which is a composite of:
o   Generic topology model: 
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-01https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo/
o   L3 topology model: 
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-00https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/
o   L2 topology model: 
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology-00https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology/
o   L1 Topology model: draft-zhang-i2rs-l1-topo-yang-model-01 (-02 released 
later this week).
o   Service topology model: draft-hares-i2rs-service-topo-yang-model-00 
(released on Wednesday)

At this time, none of the Topology models utilize Traffic engineering.  It is 
anticipated that these models will support traffic engineering.

Reading this , my question is whether there is intention for Traffic 
Engineering part of topology model to exploit/coordinate with Teas , and 
particularly with
 draft-liu-teas-yang-te-topo or to proceed with distinct contributions internal 
to I2RS.

Thanks
Sergio

___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


Re: [netmod] [Rtg-yang-coord] Requirements for I2RS protocol and I2RS interim (6/24/2015 at 10:00 - 11:30am ET)

2015-06-30 Thread Susan Hares
Mahesh: 

 

Ok.  I thought you were going to review the requirement documents and give I2RS 
an initial guess.  We have present these at 3 I2RS interims, and the slides are 
online.  I will send the minutes to the netconf working group for their review. 

 

The presentation of the requirements will need the following time: 

 

1)  10 top requirements – 5-10 minutes [Sue Hares] 

2)  Ephemeral state – 15 minutes [Jeff Haas] 

3)  Pub/sub requirements – 10-15 minutes [Eric Voit]

4)  Traceability [ 10-15 minutes] 

5)  Security [10 minutes] [Sue Hares and Joel Halpern]

6)  Review of I2RS models [5 minutes] 

7)   

If you have heard pub/sub and traceability requirements, you may delete this 
from timeline. 

 

Sue Hares 

 

From: Rtg-yang-coord [mailto:rtg-yang-coord-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
Mahesh Jethanandani
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 3:44 PM
To: Susan Hares
Cc: rtg-yang-co...@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A; Netconf; 
NETMOD Working Group
Subject: Re: [Rtg-yang-coord] [netmod] Requirements for I2RS protocol and I2RS 
interim (6/24/2015 at 10:00 - 11:30am ET)

 

Susan,

 

The NETCONF WG acknowledges the receipt of the requirements.

 

These requirements need to be discussed in front of the NETCONF WG. Would 
suggest that i2rs WG present these requirements in front of the NETCONF WG 
during IETF 93 in Prague to kick start discussion within the WG. Please let us 
know how much time you (or someone from i2rs) would need to present the 
requirements.

 

Thanks.

 

On Jun 23, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Susan Hares sha...@ndzh.com wrote:

 

Netconf Working Group: 

 

The I2RS WG would like to pass you a set of requirements for the I2RS protocol, 
and asks that you provide an analysis by IETF 93 on whether NETCONF or RESTCONF 
can meet these requirements.   We expect that these requirements may require 
changes to the either NETCONF or RESTCONF.  

 

The I2RS architecture document ( 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-architecture/ 
draft-ietf-i2rs-architecture-09) provides a high-level overview of the I2RS  
protocol.  The I2RS has compiled the following documents to provide the 
additional details on the requirements for the protocols. 

 

1)   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state/ 
draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-00 

2)   
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements/ 
draft-ietf-i2rs-pub-sub-requirements-02 

3)   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability/ 
draft-ietf-i2rs-traceability-03  

 

The draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-00 contains the results of the discussion 
from the 6/10 interim and the top 10 requirements for I2RS.  In addition, the 
draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-state-00 contains an set of detailed requirements on 
how the I2RS WG sees the I2RS protocol operating.  These detailed requirements 
are to be seen as suggestions on what type of solution the I2RS WG would like 
to see, but I2RS WG is asking the NETCONF WG to provide its best designed 
protocol.  Please note as part of these detailed requirement the 
draft-ietf-i2rs-ephemeral-states-00 contains the idea of using metadata to 
record secondary identity.   

 

The I2RS protocol is driven by data-models.  The approved data models for 
protocol independent services are:

-   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model/ 
draft-ietf-i2rs-rib-data-model-00

-  Filter-Based RIBS:  draft-kini-i2rs-fb-rib-data-model.00 (released 
later this week)

-  Topology model which is a composite of:

o   Generic topology model:  
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo/ 
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-network-topo-01 

o   L3 topology model:  
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology/ 
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l3-topology-00 

o   L2 topology model:  
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology/ 
draft-ietf-i2rs-yang-l2-network-topology-00 

o   L1 Topology model: draft-zhang-i2rs-l1-topo-yang-model-01 (-02 released 
later this week). 

o   Service topology model: draft-hares-i2rs-service-topo-yang-model-00 
(released on Wednesday)

 

At this time, none of the Topology models utilize Traffic engineering.  It is 
anticipated that these models will support traffic engineering.  Estimated 
rates of transfer and timing requirements for these modules are at:  
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/i2rs/trac/wiki 
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/i2rs/trac/wiki - under the protocol requirements 
table. 

 

We hope that NETCONF WG can provide some initial feedback on these requirements 
by IETF 93 at the Tuesday I2RS session.   I2RS will use the 6/24 interim at 
10:00-11:30am ET  to provide a time for any participate in the I2RS, netconf, 
or netmod group to ask additional questions on these requirements. 

 

Sue Hares 

 

Interim time: 10:00-11:30am ET

Date 6/24/2015

Webex: