Re: [netmod] NETMOD WG Virtual Interim Meeting: 22 February 2016
> From: Nadeau Thomas, February 24, 2016 9:20 AM > > > On Feb 23, 2016:6:21 PM, at 6:21 PM, Eric Voit (evoit)> wrote: > > > > Hi Kent, > > > > Thanks for running the interim, I agree it was quite useful. > > > > One thing I wanted to pull out from the minutes was the overall definition > > of > "Mount". Right now there are 830 web pages on the OpenDaylight site which > refer to "Mount" in terms of Peer Mount (i.e., something much like > draft-clemm- > netmod-mount). > > > > That does not mean that the IETF need define "Mount" the same way as an > Open Source project. But it is possible at this stage to create both > terminology > and requirements which breaks down the overall problem space. In other > words there is nothing stopping us from defining a set of terms and technology > solutions which fit together in a complimentary way. Nothing here need > conflict. > > I agree that normalizing the terminology is probably a good thing. What > I would caution against is a unilateral definition here as it is likely to be > IETF- > centric; its a good idea to poll the other communities that are using this > technology. Makes sense. Any thoughts on who might represent the meaning of Mount from ODL? Eric > —Tom > > > > If there is community interest, I would be willing to pull together a > > strawman > requirements/terminology draft describing the differences between mounting > schemas on a box, mounting a remote datastore. > > > > Any interest? > > Eric > > > >> From: netmod, February 22, 2016 3:51 PM > >> > >> > >> Thank you all who joined today’s virtual interim meeting. > >> > >> Other than my starting the recording late and rearranging the > >> presentation order, I thought that the meeting went really well in > >> that there seems to be a lot of support for trying to solve this > >> problem, and because we have a plan to try to move towards having a > >> WG document in the BA timeframe. The plan is for > >> draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount to be updated based on the > meeting and for it to be discussed on list as the basis for the WG effort on > the > topic. > >> > >> Attached are the very rough Ethernet minutes captured during the meeting. > >> Please review carefully. Corrections can be made on the etherpad here: > >> http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim-20160222 (so we > >> can track changes, the end of meeting snapshot is here: > >> http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim- > >> 20160222/timeslider#3933) > >> > >> To listen to the recording, please follow one of these two links: > >> > >> Streaming recording link: > >> > >> https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/ldr.php?RCID=4dc88386f13a49fa8f2c934db953 > >> f4a2 > >> > >> Download recording link: > >> > >> https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/lsr.php?RCID=1b6490fe5cc6fc95d4e3c9b913df > >> dc1f > >> > >> > >> Thanks again, > >> > >> Kent and Lou > > > > ___ > > netmod mailing list > > netmod@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] NETMOD WG Virtual Interim Meeting: 22 February 2016
Hi Eric, I agree with you that it is important to distinuguish the construction of a data model schema from mechanisms for combining data trees, and I believe the term "mount" is mostly connected to the latter (as in NFS mount). FWIW, the YSDL draft doesn't use the term "mount" at all. I'd suggest to wait for the concrete technical solution of structural-mount/YSDL, then it may be easier to figure out an appropriate term. Lada > On 24 Feb 2016, at 00:21, Eric Voit (evoit)wrote: > > Hi Kent, > > Thanks for running the interim, I agree it was quite useful. > > One thing I wanted to pull out from the minutes was the overall definition of > "Mount". Right now there are 830 web pages on the OpenDaylight site which > refer to "Mount" in terms of Peer Mount (i.e., something much like > draft-clemm-netmod-mount). > > That does not mean that the IETF need define "Mount" the same way as an Open > Source project. But it is possible at this stage to create both terminology > and requirements which breaks down the overall problem space. In other > words there is nothing stopping us from defining a set of terms and > technology solutions which fit together in a complimentary way. Nothing here > need conflict. > > If there is community interest, I would be willing to pull together a > strawman requirements/terminology draft describing the differences between > mounting schemas on a box, mounting a remote datastore. > > Any interest? > Eric > >> From: netmod, February 22, 2016 3:51 PM >> >> >> Thank you all who joined today’s virtual interim meeting. >> >> Other than my starting the recording late and rearranging the presentation >> order, >> I thought that the meeting went really well in that there seems to be a lot >> of >> support for trying to solve this problem, and because we have a plan to try >> to >> move towards having a WG document in the BA timeframe. The plan is for >> draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount to be updated based on the meeting >> and for it to be discussed on list as the basis for the WG effort on the >> topic. >> >> Attached are the very rough Ethernet minutes captured during the meeting. >> Please review carefully. Corrections can be made on the etherpad here: >> http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim-20160222 (so we can >> track changes, the end of meeting snapshot is here: >> http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim- >> 20160222/timeslider#3933) >> >> To listen to the recording, please follow one of these two links: >> >> Streaming recording link: >> >> https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/ldr.php?RCID=4dc88386f13a49fa8f2c934db953f4a2 >> >> Download recording link: >> >> https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/lsr.php?RCID=1b6490fe5cc6fc95d4e3c9b913dfdc1f >> >> >> Thanks again, >> >> Kent and Lou > -- Ladislav Lhotka, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: E74E8C0C ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] NETMOD WG Virtual Interim Meeting: 22 February 2016
> From: Kent Watsen, February 23, 2016 7:19 PM > > Hi Eric, > > If you have a proposal, please send. A draft seems overkill to me, but maybe > you > have something in mind? I have only the beginnings of a division of terminology and function in mind. I would put time into this should people care. More below. > I’m personally okay to name the schema-mount thing to something that doesn’t > use the word “mount”, so long as it’s still easy to understand. Worst case we > could all switch to using long form (e.g., schema-mount-point, instance-mount- > point), what do you think? At IETF 94, there was a proposal for something called Alias Mount. https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-netmod-19.pdf (see slide 6) Alias mount didn't add a reference to an external box (like peer mount). It included just the subset of configuration needed to reference a locally targeted subtree. There were not provisions to augment the schema with additional info. I can see a reason for schema mount, alias mount, and peer mount. So without thinking too deeply, I believe it should be possible to have the needed parameters for WG selected mount variations which could be placed under the generalized mount keyword. This would seem to be an approach which is extensible, and which allows the technology solutions/requirements to be driven in parallel. Eric > Kent > > > > On 2/23/16, 6:21 PM, "Eric Voit (evoit)"wrote: > > >Hi Kent, > > > >Thanks for running the interim, I agree it was quite useful. > > > >One thing I wanted to pull out from the minutes was the overall definition of > "Mount". Right now there are 830 web pages on the OpenDaylight site which > refer to "Mount" in terms of Peer Mount (i.e., something much like > draft-clemm- > netmod-mount). > > > >That does not mean that the IETF need define "Mount" the same way as an > Open Source project. But it is possible at this stage to create both > terminology > and requirements which breaks down the overall problem space. In other > words there is nothing stopping us from defining a set of terms and technology > solutions which fit together in a complimentary way. Nothing here need > conflict. > > > >If there is community interest, I would be willing to pull together a > >strawman > requirements/terminology draft describing the differences between mounting > schemas on a box, mounting a remote datastore. > > > >Any interest? > >Eric > > > >> From: netmod, February 22, 2016 3:51 PM > >> > >> > >> Thank you all who joined today’s virtual interim meeting. > >> > >> Other than my starting the recording late and rearranging the > >> presentation order, I thought that the meeting went really well in > >> that there seems to be a lot of support for trying to solve this > >> problem, and because we have a plan to try to move towards having a > >> WG document in the BA timeframe. The plan is for > >> draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount to be updated based on the > meeting and for it to be discussed on list as the basis for the WG effort on > the > topic. > >> > >> Attached are the very rough Ethernet minutes captured during the meeting. > >> Please review carefully. Corrections can be made on the etherpad here: > >> http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim-20160222 (so we > >> can track changes, the end of meeting snapshot is here: > >> http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim- > >> 20160222/timeslider#3933) > >> > >> To listen to the recording, please follow one of these two links: > >> > >> Streaming recording link: > >> > >> https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/ldr.php?RCID=4dc88386f13a49fa8f2c934db953 > >> f4a2 > >> > >> Download recording link: > >> > >> https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/lsr.php?RCID=1b6490fe5cc6fc95d4e3c9b913df > >> dc1f > >> > >> > >> Thanks again, > >> > >> Kent and Lou > > ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] NETMOD WG Virtual Interim Meeting: 22 February 2016
Hi Kent, Thanks for running the interim, I agree it was quite useful. One thing I wanted to pull out from the minutes was the overall definition of "Mount". Right now there are 830 web pages on the OpenDaylight site which refer to "Mount" in terms of Peer Mount (i.e., something much like draft-clemm-netmod-mount). That does not mean that the IETF need define "Mount" the same way as an Open Source project. But it is possible at this stage to create both terminology and requirements which breaks down the overall problem space. In other words there is nothing stopping us from defining a set of terms and technology solutions which fit together in a complimentary way. Nothing here need conflict. If there is community interest, I would be willing to pull together a strawman requirements/terminology draft describing the differences between mounting schemas on a box, mounting a remote datastore. Any interest? Eric > From: netmod, February 22, 2016 3:51 PM > > > Thank you all who joined today’s virtual interim meeting. > > Other than my starting the recording late and rearranging the presentation > order, > I thought that the meeting went really well in that there seems to be a lot of > support for trying to solve this problem, and because we have a plan to try to > move towards having a WG document in the BA timeframe. The plan is for > draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount to be updated based on the meeting > and for it to be discussed on list as the basis for the WG effort on the > topic. > > Attached are the very rough Ethernet minutes captured during the meeting. > Please review carefully. Corrections can be made on the etherpad here: > http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim-20160222 (so we can > track changes, the end of meeting snapshot is here: > http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim- > 20160222/timeslider#3933) > > To listen to the recording, please follow one of these two links: > > Streaming recording link: > > https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/ldr.php?RCID=4dc88386f13a49fa8f2c934db953f4a2 > > Download recording link: > > https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/lsr.php?RCID=1b6490fe5cc6fc95d4e3c9b913dfdc1f > > > Thanks again, > > Kent and Lou ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] NETMOD WG Virtual Interim Meeting: 22 February 2016
Thank you all who joined today’s virtual interim meeting. Other than my starting the recording late and rearranging the presentation order, I thought that the meeting went really well in that there seems to be a lot of support for trying to solve this problem, and because we have a plan to try to move towards having a WG document in the BA timeframe. The plan is for draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount to be updated based on the meeting and for it to be discussed on list as the basis for the WG effort on the topic. Attached are the very rough Ethernet minutes captured during the meeting. Please review carefully. Corrections can be made on the etherpad here: http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim-20160222 (so we can track changes, the end of meeting snapshot is here: http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim-20160222/timeslider#3933) To listen to the recording, please follow one of these two links: Streaming recording link: https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/ldr.php?RCID=4dc88386f13a49fa8f2c934db953f4a2 Download recording link: https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/lsr.php?RCID=1b6490fe5cc6fc95d4e3c9b913dfdc1f Thanks again, Kent and Lou On 2/22/16, 8:23 AM, "netmod on behalf of Kent Watsen"wrote: > >Friendly reminder, this meeting starts in about 90 minutes. > >Cheers, >Kent > > > > >On 2/10/16, 10:46 AM, "netmod on behalf of IESG Secretary" > wrote: > >>The NETCONF Data Modeling Language (NETMOD) WG will have a virtual >>interim meeting on 22 February 2016 at 10:00 EST (15:00 UTC) to discuss >>use-cases and solutions for combining YANG modules into the schema >>defined in other YANG modules, as this is a blocking item for some other >>working groups currently. The agenda for the meeting is: >> >>5 min: agenda bashing, scribes, note well, etherpad, etc. >>20 min: use-case summary (draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-02) >>20 min: proposal #1 (draft-lhotka-netmod-ysdl-00) >>20 min: proposal #2 (draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount-00) >>55 min: general discussion or end early >> >>All participants should come prepared to discuss these drafts. >> >>Note: it is understood that draft-clemm-netmod-mount is related work, >>but the chairs wish to only focus on the schema composition issue at >>this time. >> >>Etherpad: http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim-20160222 >> >>Regards, >> >>NETMOD Chairs >> >>-- >>NETMOD Virtual Interim Meeting >>Monday, February 22, 2016 >>4:00 pm | Europe Time (Berlin, GMT+01:00) | 2 hrs >> >>Join WebEx meeting: >>https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=me171803d3dfe83d3f0d003f8332b032f >>Meeting number: 646 684 956 >>Meeting password: Qbds3nPZ >> >>Join by phone >>1-877-668-4493 Call-in toll free number (US/Canada) >>1-650-479-3208 Call-in toll number (US/Canada) >>Access code: 646 684 956 >>Toll-free calling restrictions >> >>Add this meeting to your calendar. (Cannot add from mobile devices.) >>https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=mf4e7a67f2b45f6542947fa3464d35e05 >> >>Can't join the meeting? Contact support. >> >>IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please note that this WebEx service allows audio and >>other information sent during the session to be recorded, which may be >>discoverable in a legal matter. By joining this session, you >>automatically consent to such recordings. If you do not consent to being >>recorded, discuss your concerns with the host or do not join the >>session. >> >>___ >>netmod mailing list >>netmod@ietf.org >>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >___ >netmod mailing list >netmod@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod [Please add your name to the virtual blue sheet at the end, and notes inline in the appropriate Notes block.] IETF NETMOD Virtual Interim Meeting Feb 22, 2016 Online Agenda and Slides at: https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2016/02/22/netmod/proceedings.html Data tracker: http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/netmod/ Tools page: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod Agenda: 5 min: agenda bashing, scribes, note well, etherpad, etc. 20 min: use-case summary (draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-02) 20 min: proposal #1 (draft-lhotka-netmod-ysdl-00) 20 min: proposal #2 (draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount-00) 55 min: general discussion or end early Attendees: - Kent Watsen Lou Berger Christian Hopps Einar Nilsen-Nygaard Juergen Schönwälder Ladislav Lhotka Xufeng Liu Martin Björklund Xian Eric Volt Vishnu Pavan Beeram Acee Lindem Gert Michael Scharf Himanshu Shah Ashesh Mishra Benoit Claise Robert Wilton Tarek Saad Dan Romanscanu Aihua Steve Baillargeon Notes: (please add to the appropriate time block) Agenda basking by Eric Voit: would like to make sure that the mount
Re: [netmod] NETMOD WG Virtual Interim Meeting: 22 February 2016
Friendly reminder, this meeting starts in about 90 minutes. Cheers, Kent On 2/10/16, 10:46 AM, "netmod on behalf of IESG Secretary"wrote: >The NETCONF Data Modeling Language (NETMOD) WG will have a virtual >interim meeting on 22 February 2016 at 10:00 EST (15:00 UTC) to discuss >use-cases and solutions for combining YANG modules into the schema >defined in other YANG modules, as this is a blocking item for some other >working groups currently. The agenda for the meeting is: > >5 min: agenda bashing, scribes, note well, etherpad, etc. >20 min: use-case summary (draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-02) >20 min: proposal #1 (draft-lhotka-netmod-ysdl-00) >20 min: proposal #2 (draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount-00) >55 min: general discussion or end early > >All participants should come prepared to discuss these drafts. > >Note: it is understood that draft-clemm-netmod-mount is related work, >but the chairs wish to only focus on the schema composition issue at >this time. > >Etherpad: http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim-20160222 > >Regards, > >NETMOD Chairs > >-- >NETMOD Virtual Interim Meeting >Monday, February 22, 2016 >4:00 pm | Europe Time (Berlin, GMT+01:00) | 2 hrs > >Join WebEx meeting: >https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=me171803d3dfe83d3f0d003f8332b032f >Meeting number: 646 684 956 >Meeting password: Qbds3nPZ > >Join by phone >1-877-668-4493 Call-in toll free number (US/Canada) >1-650-479-3208 Call-in toll number (US/Canada) >Access code: 646 684 956 >Toll-free calling restrictions > >Add this meeting to your calendar. (Cannot add from mobile devices.) >https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=mf4e7a67f2b45f6542947fa3464d35e05 > >Can't join the meeting? Contact support. > >IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please note that this WebEx service allows audio and >other information sent during the session to be recorded, which may be >discoverable in a legal matter. By joining this session, you >automatically consent to such recordings. If you do not consent to being >recorded, discuss your concerns with the host or do not join the >session. > >___ >netmod mailing list >netmod@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
[netmod] NETMOD WG Virtual Interim Meeting: 22 February 2016
The NETCONF Data Modeling Language (NETMOD) WG will have a virtual interim meeting on 22 February 2016 at 10:00 EST (15:00 UTC) to discuss use-cases and solutions for combining YANG modules into the schema defined in other YANG modules, as this is a blocking item for some other working groups currently. The agenda for the meeting is: 5 min: agenda bashing, scribes, note well, etherpad, etc. 20 min: use-case summary (draft-rtgyangdt-rtgwg-device-model-02) 20 min: proposal #1 (draft-lhotka-netmod-ysdl-00) 20 min: proposal #2 (draft-bjorklund-netmod-structural-mount-00) 55 min: general discussion or end early All participants should come prepared to discuss these drafts. Note: it is understood that draft-clemm-netmod-mount is related work, but the chairs wish to only focus on the schema composition issue at this time. Etherpad: http://etherpad.tools.ietf.org:9000/p/netmod-interim-20160222 Regards, NETMOD Chairs -- NETMOD Virtual Interim Meeting Monday, February 22, 2016 4:00 pm | Europe Time (Berlin, GMT+01:00) | 2 hrs Join WebEx meeting: https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=me171803d3dfe83d3f0d003f8332b032f Meeting number: 646 684 956 Meeting password: Qbds3nPZ Join by phone 1-877-668-4493 Call-in toll free number (US/Canada) 1-650-479-3208 Call-in toll number (US/Canada) Access code: 646 684 956 Toll-free calling restrictions Add this meeting to your calendar. (Cannot add from mobile devices.) https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=mf4e7a67f2b45f6542947fa3464d35e05 Can't join the meeting? Contact support. IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please note that this WebEx service allows audio and other information sent during the session to be recorded, which may be discoverable in a legal matter. By joining this session, you automatically consent to such recordings. If you do not consent to being recorded, discuss your concerns with the host or do not join the session. ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod