Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-02
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, Yingzhen -Original Message- From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:a...@cisco.com] Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 6:56 AM To: Lou Berger ; Ladislav Lhotka ; Yingzhen Qu Cc: NetMod WG Subject: Re: Regarding IPR on draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-02 As a co-author, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, Acee On 9/18/17, 9:48 AM, "Lou Berger" wrote: >Authors, Contributors, WG, > >As part of the preparation for WG Last Call: > >Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? > >Please state either: > >"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" >or >"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > >If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > >If yes to the above, please state either: > >"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" >or >"No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > >If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think >appropriate. > >If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the >above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are >aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next >stage until a response has been received from each author and listed >contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S >TO LINES. > >If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not >listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations >under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you >are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from >participating in any contribution or discussion related to your >undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above >and >http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > >Thank you, >NetMod WG Chairs > >PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your >response. > > > ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-02
I support adoption of this draft. I have reviewed draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-02, and ask that the following comments be considered after the document has been adopted: 1. Does the draft still require a normative reference to 6020? Given that the modules are all YANG revision 1.1 perhaps this isn't required any more? 2. In appendix D: i) it would be better if the YANG library example was updated to match the model in YANG library bis (e.g. use a modules path rather than modules-state). ii) I think that it should state that this is an example of the data that may be received by reading from the operational state datastore. iii) In the example, the "interface-state" tree output should be merged in with "interfaces" so illustrate the combined NMDA view. 3. ipv6 prefix list. When I had first looked at combining the existing RFC YANG modules to NMDA, I came up with a slightly different way of modelling IPv6 prefixes, splitting "no-advertise-prefix-list" separately from the "advertised prefixes". E.g. if your draft the tree output is: +--rw prefix-list +--rw prefix* [prefix-spec] +--rw prefix-spec inet:ipv6-prefix +--rw (control-adv-prefixes)? +--:(no-advertise) | +--rw no-advertise? empty +--:(advertise) +--rw valid-lifetime? uint32 +--rw on-link-flag? boolean +--rw preferred-lifetime? uint32 +--rw autonomous-flag? boolean Perhaps you could consider this structure instead (I can send you the actual YANG if it helps): +--rw no-advertise-prefix-list | +--rw prefix* [prefix-spec] | +--rw prefix-spec inet:ipv6-prefix | +--rw (control-adv-prefixes)? | +--:(no-advertise) | +--rw no-advertise? empty +--rw prefix-list +--rw prefix* [prefix-spec] +--rw prefix-spec inet:ipv6-prefix +--ro valid-lifetime? uint32 +--ro on-link-flag? boolean +--ro preferred-lifetime? uint32 +--ro autonomous-flag? boolean Thanks, Rob On 18/09/2017 14:55, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: As a co-author, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, Acee On 9/18/17, 9:48 AM, "Lou Berger" wrote: Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of the preparation for WG Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. Thank you, NetMod WG Chairs PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response. ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod . ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-02
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Lada Lou Berger píše v Po 18. 09. 2017 v 09:48 -0400: > Authors, Contributors, WG, > > As part of the preparation for WG Last Call: > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? > > Please state either: > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" > or > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > If yes to the above, please state either: > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" > or > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > appropriate. > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are > aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next > stage until a response has been received from each author and listed > contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S > TO LINES. > > If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed > as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under > the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are > aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from > participating in any contribution or discussion related to your > undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above > and > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > > Thank you, > NetMod WG Chairs > > PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your > response. > > > -- Ladislav Lhotka Head, CZ.NIC Labs PGP Key ID: 0xB8F92B08A9F76C67 ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-02
As a co-author, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, Acee On 9/18/17, 9:48 AM, "Lou Berger" wrote: >Authors, Contributors, WG, > >As part of the preparation for WG Last Call: > >Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? > >Please state either: > >"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" >or >"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" > >If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > >If yes to the above, please state either: > >"Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" >or >"No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > >If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think >appropriate. > >If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the >above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are >aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next >stage until a response has been received from each author and listed >contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S >TO LINES. > >If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed >as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under >the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are >aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from >participating in any contribution or discussion related to your >undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above >and >http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. > >Thank you, >NetMod WG Chairs > >PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your >response. > > > ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
[netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-02
Authors, Contributors, WG, As part of the preparation for WG Last Call: Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? If yes to the above, please state either: "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" or "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think appropriate. If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and listed contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from participating in any contribution or discussion related to your undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above and http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty. Thank you, NetMod WG Chairs PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your response. ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
