Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll (draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data)
This poll is now closed and the draft is adopted. As usual, this draft will now be progressed through normal working group process, including addressing issues raised during and after adoption. Authors, Please submit draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-05.txt with only the date updated and the file name changed to draft-ietf-netmod-yang-instance-file-format-00.txt. Please note the file name change. If you object to this change please propose an alternative. Thank you, Lou (and co-chairs) On 10/8/2018 7:38 AM, Lou Berger wrote: All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04 a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends Oct 22. Thanks, Lou (and co-chairs) ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Re: [netmod] WG adoption poll - draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04
Hello Qin, I will add the referemce. Netconf server capabilities can be read from ietf-netconf-monitoring /ncm:netconf-state/ncm:capabilities/ncm:capability regards Balazs On 2018. 10. 09. 8:28, Qin Wu wrote: Support adoption of this draft, Two quick comments on this draft 1. section 2.5 factory default setting I would suggest to reference to draft-wu-netconf-restconf-factory-restore in section 2.5. I think this draft is complementary to draft-wu-netconf-restconf-factory-restore-02, factory datastore can rely on yang instance data file to specify the content of factory datastore. 2. section 2.3 server capability Server capability in the context of this draft is referred to a set of models and features which can be retrieved from yang library, I see server capability as NETCONF capability. I am wondering whether yang data instance file can also be used to specify capability identifiers. Some time I have trouble to understand where the server to get capability identifier and exchange it in the hello message. I understand RFC6470 can advertise the capability change. -Qin -邮件原件- 发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Lou Berger 发送时间: 2018年10月8日 19:39 收件人: NetMod WG 抄送: NetMod WG Chairs 主题: [netmod] WG adoption poll All, This is start of a two week poll on making draft-lengyel-netmod-yang-instance-data-04 a working group document. Please send email to the list indicating "yes/support" or "no/do not support". If indicating no, please state your reservations with the document. If yes, please also feel free to provide comments you'd like to see addressed once the document is a WG document. The poll ends Oct 22. Thanks, Lou (and co-chairs) ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod -- Balazs Lengyel Ericsson Hungary Ltd. Senior Specialist Mobile: +36-70-330-7909 email: balazs.leng...@ericsson.com smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
