Re: [netmod] What's the plan with draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags

2022-10-10 Thread Qin Wu
Hi, Lou and Adrian:
We authors plan to issue a new version. We heard some feedback from Balazs and 
Rob, had some offline discussion with them during last IETF, come up with 
proposal and questions and brought up on the list on August, Juergen provided 
his thoughts on these proposal, it looks addition extension is not needed based 
on Juergen’s feedback. Silence for a while seems to stand for agreement,My 
feeling is some wording and clarification text is needed, but I love to hear if 
there are different options.

Chairs, please let us know anything else is needed from us.




吴钦 Wu Qin
Mobile:+86-13914734360(Mobile Number)
Email:bill...@huawei.com<mailto:bill...@huawei.com>

发件人: Lou Bergermailto:lber...@labn.net>>
收件人: 
adrianmailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk>>;netmod-chairsmailto:netmod-cha...@ietf.org>>
抄送: 
netmodmailto:netmod@ietf.org>>;draft-ietf-netmod-node-tagsmailto:draft-ietf-netmod-node-t...@ietf.org>>
主题: Re: [netmod] What's the plan with draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags
时间: 2022-10-11 02:56:33

Adrian,

Thanks for this -- as far as I can tell, Jurgen's comments were not
addressed in the on-list discussion in August.  Do think that they
were?  We were at least expecting some document update based on the
discussion.

Authors/Contributors,

 Where do you think we stand in resolving the on-list discussion?

Thanks,

Lou (and Kent)

On 10/10/2022 4:29 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Discussion of this document seemed to fizzle out in August, and the last
> email seems to be Qin saying "I'm happy to make no change if no change is
> needed."
>
> Where does that leave us with regards to the WG last call comments and the
> discussion at IETF-114?
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>

___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


Re: [netmod] What's the plan with draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags

2022-10-10 Thread Lou Berger

Adrian,

Thanks for this -- as far as I can tell, Jurgen's comments were not 
addressed in the on-list discussion in August.  Do think that they 
were?  We were at least expecting some document update based on the 
discussion.


Authors/Contributors,

    Where do you think we stand in resolving the on-list discussion?

Thanks,

Lou (and Kent)

On 10/10/2022 4:29 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:

Hi,

Discussion of this document seemed to fizzle out in August, and the last
email seems to be Qin saying "I'm happy to make no change if no change is
needed."

Where does that leave us with regards to the WG last call comments and the
discussion at IETF-114?

Thanks,
Adrian



___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod


[netmod] What's the plan with draft-ietf-netmod-node-tags

2022-10-10 Thread Adrian Farrel
Hi,

Discussion of this document seemed to fizzle out in August, and the last
email seems to be Qin saying "I'm happy to make no change if no change is
needed."

Where does that leave us with regards to the WG last call comments and the
discussion at IETF-114?

Thanks,
Adrian

___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod