Re: [netmod] draft netmod agenda posted

2017-07-13 Thread Kent Watsen 



>> Could all the presenters please have a slide on their module's NMDA
>> compatibility status?  Things to consider:
>> 
>>  - is the operational state of configured values important?
>>  - is there is a need to support system generated entries?
>>  - note: if yes to either, the module SHOULD be NMDA-compatible.
>>  is it? - is there a "-state" tree in the Appendix?
>>
>
>I find this confusing. I think modules should be default be
>NMDA-compatible. I also think -state trees should be avoided
>as much as possible. So the questions should be something like
>this:
>
> - Is the module NMDA-compatible? If not, why not?
> - Does the appendix include a -state tree? If so, why is
>   it necessary and how to transition away from it?

Yes, by all means, this is even more to the point.

Thanks,
Kent


___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Re: [netmod] draft netmod agenda posted

2017-07-12 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder 
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 09:48:30PM +, Kent Watsen wrote:
> 
> Could all the presenters please have a slide on their module's NMDA
> compatibility status?  Things to consider:
> 
>  - is the operational state of configured values important?
>  - is there is a need to support system generated entries?
>  - note: if yes to either, the module SHOULD be NMDA-compatible.
>  is it? - is there a "-state" tree in the Appendix?
>

I find this confusing. I think modules should be default be
NMDA-compatible. I also think -state trees should be avoided
as much as possible. So the questions should be something like
this:

 - Is the module NMDA-compatible? If not, why not?
 - Does the appendix include a -state tree? If so, why is
   it necessary and how to transition away from it?

/js

-- 
Juergen Schoenwaelder   Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
Fax:   +49 421 200 3103 

___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Re: [netmod] draft netmod agenda posted

2017-07-11 Thread Kent Watsen 

Could all the presenters please have a slide on their module's NMDA
compatibility status?  Things to consider:

 - is the operational state of configured values important?
 - is there is a need to support system generated entries?
 - note: if yes to either, the module SHOULD be NMDA-compatible.
 is it? - is there a "-state" tree in the Appendix?

Thanks,
Kent // co-chair


--

The draft agenda for the NETMOD sessions at IETF 99 has been posted:

  https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/agenda/netmod/

Please let us know if any adjustments are needed.

Thanks,
NETMOD WG Chairs



___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

[netmod] draft netmod agenda posted

2017-07-07 Thread Kent Watsen 

The draft agenda for the NETMOD sessions at IETF 99 has been posted:

  https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/agenda/netmod/

Please let us know if any adjustments are needed.

Thanks,
NETMOD WG Chairs



___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod