Re: mailto:
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 09:02:57AM +, Richard Torrens (lists) wrote: > > This system appears to defeat spammers - most of the email addresses that > have been spammed seem to have been harvested from computers by malware. We're getting dangerously off-topic here, but they mostly harvest them from: - usenet and mailing lists such as this (they are so bountiful, the harvesters simply special-case the mitigations that mailing list archival websites use to obscure addresses) - brute-forcing people's email passwords, not only to send spam through but to harvest addresses from your INBOX and address book. - Guesswork. Attempting to send an email is cheap, so when you get a list of current domains, you simply try all the common stuff, like "lists" or "tim". Doing it on your website with mailto: links isn't worth it these days, spidering the web like that is comparitively expensive compared to the above techniques. B.
Re Wikipedia (OT)
Tim Hill wrote on 19 Feb: > Even Wikipedia gets this right. If it didn't, then of course it would now, because you surely have signed up for an account as one of the crowd-sourced and peer-reviewed editors and you would have contributed the required correction. -- Jim Nagel www.archivemag.co.uk || See you at the show? www.riscos-swshow.co.uk Feb 24
Re: mailto:
In article <56ccf68de6...@timil.com>, Tim Hillwrote: > Coincidentally, I have just been adding 'munge' to > http://timil.com/riscos and IME this conversion of a mailto link into > entities seems enough to prevent harvesting by spammers. Or the ones that > do are so useless it doesn't even reach me! My script required a hidden variable be sent - the variable determines the script action. This system appears to defeat spammers - most of the email addresses that have been spammed seem to have been harvested from computers by malware. -- Richard Torrens. http://www.Torrens.org for genealogy, natural history, wild food, walks, cats and more!