Re: is this a bug or a site source error?
In message <1320531574.29744.10.camel@duiker> John-Mark Bell wrote: > On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 21:13 +, Dave Higton wrote: > > Please try: > > > > http://opensource.com/life/11/11/drm-graveyard-brief-history-digital-rights-management-music > > > > (I hope I've copied that out correctly; I can't seem to drag it out of > > NS.) > > > > I get a warning from NetSurf: "Error while processing content unencoding: > > invalid code lengths set" > > > > Is this a bug in NetSurf, or is it an error in the site's source > > code? If it's a bug, I will happily report it. > > The site responds with a gzip-encoded stream containing trailing > garbage. This causes the HTTP library we use to complain with the > message you see. r13129 contains an egregious hack around the problem > which should make it work as well as can be expected. Thank you, John-Mark; I confirm it does. A good opportunity to thank the whole NS team again, too! Dave
Re: is this a bug or a site source error?
On 5 Nov 2011, John-Mark Bell wrote: > On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 22:45 +, Tony Moore wrote: > > On 5 Nov 2011, John-Mark Bell wrote: > > > On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 21:13 +, Dave Higton wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > > > > http://opensource.com/life/11/11/drm-graveyard-brief-history-digital-rights-management-music > > > > [snip] > > > > > The site responds with a gzip-encoded stream containing trailing > > > garbage. This causes the HTTP library we use to complain with the > > > message you see. > > > > In that case, why does r13077 have no problem with the site? > > Most likely because you're fetching it through a proxy server which > fixes the brokenness. Certainly, there's no reason for r13077 to work > any better than later versions in this respect. NetSurf is configured to use 'No proxy'. Is it possible that my ISP connects via a proxy, without my knowledge? Tony
Re: is this a bug or a site source error?
On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 22:45 +, Tony Moore wrote: > On 5 Nov 2011, John-Mark Bell wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 21:13 +, Dave Higton wrote: > > [snip] > > > > http://opensource.com/life/11/11/drm-graveyard-brief-history-digital-rights-management-music > > [snip] > > > The site responds with a gzip-encoded stream containing trailing > > garbage. This causes the HTTP library we use to complain with the > > message you see. > > In that case, why does r13077 have no problem with the site? Most likely because you're fetching it through a proxy server which fixes the brokenness. Certainly, there's no reason for r13077 to work any better than later versions in this respect. John-Mark.
Re: is this a bug or a site source error?
On 5 Nov 2011, John-Mark Bell wrote: > On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 21:13 +, Dave Higton wrote: [snip] > > http://opensource.com/life/11/11/drm-graveyard-brief-history-digital-rights-management-music [snip] > The site responds with a gzip-encoded stream containing trailing > garbage. This causes the HTTP library we use to complain with the > message you see. In that case, why does r13077 have no problem with the site? Tony
Re: is this a bug or a site source error?
On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 21:13 +, Dave Higton wrote: > Please try: > > http://opensource.com/life/11/11/drm-graveyard-brief-history-digital-rights-management-music > > (I hope I've copied that out correctly; I can't seem to drag it out of > NS.) > > I get a warning from NetSurf: "Error while processing content unencoding: > invalid code lengths set" > > Is this a bug in NetSurf, or is it an error in the site's source > code? If it's a bug, I will happily report it. The site responds with a gzip-encoded stream containing trailing garbage. This causes the HTTP library we use to complain with the message you see. r13129 contains an egregious hack around the problem which should make it work as well as can be expected. John-Mark.
Re: is this a bug or a site source error?
On 5 Nov 2011 Tony Moore wrote: > On 5 Nov 2011, Dave Higton wrote: >> Please try: >> >> http://opensource.com/life/11/11/drm-graveyard-brief-history-digital-r >> ights-management-music >> >> (I hope I've copied that out correctly; I can't seem to drag it out of >> NS.) >> >> I get a warning from NetSurf: "Error while processing content >> unencoding: invalid code lengths set" > Here, using NetSurf r13077, running on RO 6.20, there is no error, and > the page is displayed, more or less correctly. However, for reasons not > understood, NetSurf decided to re-scan the fonts before loading (NetSurf > was not running, when I double-clicked the URL). Here it does the crash with r13124 and RISC OS 4.02. With best wishes, Peter. -- Peter \ / zfc Lu \ Prestbury, Cheltenham, Glos. GL52 and \/ ____ \ England. family / / \ | | |\ | / _ \ http://pnyoung.orpheusweb.co.uk / \__/ \_/ | \| \__/ \__ pnyo...@ormail.co.uk
Re: is this a bug or a site source error?
On 5 Nov 2011, Dave Higton wrote: > Please try: > > http://opensource.com/life/11/11/drm-graveyard-brief-history-digital-rights-management-music > > (I hope I've copied that out correctly; I can't seem to drag it out of > NS.) > > I get a warning from NetSurf: "Error while processing content > unencoding: invalid code lengths set" Here, using NetSurf r13077, running on RO 6.20, there is no error, and the page is displayed, more or less correctly. However, for reasons not understood, NetSurf decided to re-scan the fonts before loading (NetSurf was not running, when I double-clicked the URL). Tony
Re: is this a bug or a site source error?
In message <4c9c8e2d52.davehig...@dsl.pipex.com> Dave Higton wrote: > Please try: > http://opensource.com/life/11/11/drm-graveyard-brief-history-digital-r > ights-management-music > (I hope I've copied that out correctly; I can't seem to drag it out of > NS.) > I get a warning from NetSurf: "Error while processing content unencoding: > invalid code lengths set" Me too, Alan --
Re: is this a bug or a site source error?
On 5 Nov 2011 Dave Higton wrote: > Please try: > http://opensource.com/life/11/11/drm-graveyard-brief-history-digital-r > ights-management-music > (I hope I've copied that out correctly; I can't seem to drag it out of > NS.) > I get a warning from NetSurf: "Error while processing content unencoding: > invalid code lengths set" > Is this a bug in NetSurf, or is it an error in the site's source > code? If it's a bug, I will happily report it. I get the same message. The page has 33 validation errors, but NS should make the best of it rather than barf at it. The page renders in Oregano 1.10 though not with the intended formatting. It is a nuisance that in this situation you can't shift-drag or ctrl-drag the URL, although you can copy it to the clipboard. -- Richard Porterhttp://www.minijem.plus.com/ mailto:r...@minijem.plus.com I don't want a "user experience" - I just want stuff that works.
is this a bug or a site source error?
Please try: http://opensource.com/life/11/11/drm-graveyard-brief-history-digital-rights-management-music (I hope I've copied that out correctly; I can't seem to drag it out of NS.) I get a warning from NetSurf: "Error while processing content unencoding: invalid code lengths set" Is this a bug in NetSurf, or is it an error in the site's source code? If it's a bug, I will happily report it. Dave
Re: Is this a bug.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Barry. Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Folks, > Can anyone confirm that there seems to be a bug in the Netsurf table > handling. > http://www.zen57462.zen.co.uk/test.htm > The row background colour is not carried across to the last four cells > of the table. Bug! The last two data cells should, by the way, have an end tag - but this doesn't make any difference to the rendering. Keith -- Inspired!
Is this a bug.
Hi Folks, Can anyone confirm that there seems to be a bug in the Netsurf table handling. http://www.zen57462.zen.co.uk/test.htm The row background colour is not carried across to the last four cells of the table. -- Barry A.
