Re: Faulty page or faulty browser?

2011-08-30 Thread Tim Hill 
In article 520abc737ajoh...@ukgateway.net, John Williams
joh...@ukgateway.net wrote:
 In article 520aba7967joh...@ukgateway.net, John Williams
joh...@ukgateway.net wrote:

  Whether this special case error is worth auto-compensating for or not
  is up to the developers - but if others get it 'right', who knows!

 Contact address given on the page is no longer valid.

 Presumably a 'legacy' page.

To see (hopefully) that entire legacy site in NetSurf please try this:

http://timil.com/pirate.king

-- 
Tim Hill
..
www.timil.com

Re: Faulty page or faulty browser?

2011-08-30 Thread Richard Ashbery 
In article 520ac71d6a...@timil.com, Tim Hill t...@timil.com wrote:
 In article 520abc737ajoh...@ukgateway.net, John Williams
 joh...@ukgateway.net wrote:
  In article 520aba7967joh...@ukgateway.net, John Williams
 joh...@ukgateway.net wrote:

 To see (hopefully) that entire legacy site in NetSurf please try
 this:

 http://timil.com/pirate.king

Makes my eyes go funny ;-)

Richard