nettime DOW HELP FOR BHOPAL A HOAX

2004-12-04 Thread Dow Chemical Corporation
December 3, 2004
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

DOW STATEMENT A HOAX
Historic aid package for Bhopal victims a lie

   Contact: Marina Ashanin, Corp. Media Relations, +41-1-728-2347
   Related information: http://dowethics.com/bhopal/

Today on BBC World Television, a fake Dow spokesperson announced fake
plans to take full responsibility for the very real Bhopal tragedy of
December 3, 1984. (1) Dow Chemical emphatically denies this
announcement. Although seemingly humanistic in nature, the fake plans
were invented by irresponsible hucksters with no regard for the
truth.

As Dow has repeatedly noted, Dow cannot and will not take
responsibility for the accident. (What we cannot and will not do...
is accept responsibility for the Bhopal accident. - CEO Michael
Parker, 2002.) The Dow position has not changed, despite public
pressure.

Dow also notes the great injustice that these pranksters have caused
by giving Bhopalis false hope for a better future assisted by Dow.
The survivors of Bhopal have already suffered 20 years of false hope,
neglect, and abdication of responsibility by all parties. Is that not
enough?

To be perfectly clear:

* The Union Carbide Corporation (UCC) will NOT be liquidated. (The
fake Dow plan called for the dissolution and sale of Dow's fully
owned subsidiary, estimated at US$12 billion, to fund compensation
and remediation in Bhopal.)

* Dow will NOT commit ANY funds to compensate and treat 120,000
Bhopal residents who require lifelong care. The Bhopal victims have
ALREADY been compensated; many received about US$500 several years
ago, which in India can cover a full year of medical care. (2)

* Dow will NOT remediate (clean up) the Bhopal plant site. We do
understand that UCC abandoned thousands of tons of toxic chemicals on
the site, and that these still contaminate the groundwater which area
residents drink. Dow estimates that the Indian government's recent
proposal to commission a study to consider the possibility of proper
remediation at some point in the future is fully sufficient.

* Dow does NOT urge the US to extradite former Union Carbide CEO
Warren Anderson to India, where he has been wanted for 20 years on
multiple homicide charges. (3)

* Dow will NOT release proprietary information on the leaked gases,
nor the results of studies commissioned by UCC and never released.

* Dow will NOT fund research on the safety of Dow endocrine
disruptors (ECDs) considered to have long-term negative effects.

* Dow DOES agree that One can't assign a dollar value to doing
what's morally right, as hoaxter Finisterra said. That is why Dow
acknowledged and resolved many of Union Carbide's liabilities in the
US immediately after acquiring the company in 2001. (4)

Again, most importantly of all:

* Dow shareholders will see NO losses, because Dow's policy towards
Bhopal HAS NOT CHANGED. Much as we at Dow may care, as human beings,
about the victims of the Bhopal catastrophe, we must reiterate that
Dow's sole and unique responsibility is to its shareholders, and Dow
CANNOT do anything that goes against its bottom line unless forced to
by law.

For more information please contact Marina Ashanin, Corporate Media
Relations, +41-1-728-2347, or reply to this email.


NOTES TO EDITORS:

(1) On December 3, 1984, Union Carbide - now part of Dow -
accidentally killed thousands of residents of Bhopal, India, when its
pesticide plant leaked a vast cloud of lethal gas over the city.
Since that date, at least 12,000 more people have died from
complications, and 120,000 remain chronically ill. The Dow Chemical
Corporation hereby expresses its condolences to the victims.

(2) Union Carbide was originally forced to pay US$470 million in
compensation to survivors, which amounts to about US$500 per victim.
(Note: Dow hereby wishes to retract the 2002 statement of Dow PR Head
Kathy Hunt as to US$500 being plenty good for an Indian. The poor
phrasing of this statement has often come back to haunt us.)

(3) Arrested in India following the accident, Andersen posted
US$2000 bail and successfully escaped India.

(4) Dow settled Union Carbide's asbestos liabilities in the US, and
paid US$10 million to one family poisoned by a Dow pesticide. This
is a mark of Dow's corporate responsibility.

 # 30 #


#  distributed via nettime: no commercial use without permission
#  nettime is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and info nettime-l in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: nettimethe dollar's demise (and the rise of Asia)

2004-12-04 Thread Benedict Seymour
Hi

 Anyway, read on, nettimers, and contemplate the end of the world as
 we know it. Or at least get out while you can.

 Keith Hart

Below, a very strong analysis by Loren Goldner of the newly discovered
- but clearly rather well established - dollar crisis.
if he's right, it doesnt sound like those who will be most affected
will have the option of getting out.

Ben Seymour

http://home.earthlink.net/%7Elrgoldner/dollarcrisis.html

The Dollar Crisis, and Us

By Loren Goldner

  Incredible as it may sound, ever since the late 1950's, the world
economy has been tossing around a hot potato of an ever-increasing
mass of nomad dollars (dollars held outside the U.S.) whose actual
conversion into tangible wealth would plunge the world into a
deflationary crash. Even now, few people are aware of the extent to
which this technical question of economics (and in reality a
profoundly social question) has in fact cadenced 45 years of world
history, erupting into view in key years such as 1968 (dollar
convertibility crisis), 1973 (end of the Bretton Woods System), 1979
(runaway global inflation, gold at $850 an ounce) 1990 (Japanese
deflation) or 1997-98 (Asia crisis, Russian default, hedge fund
crisis). We are clearly today at another key turning point, and perhaps
(over the next few years) at the long-delayed culmination of the whole
story, when that mass of dollars, now grown to gargantuan proportions
(the $30 billion of 1958 have become at least $11 trillion today) will
be deflated, one way or another.

  With the election safely behind it, the Bush administration in the
U.S. can now get on with the world economic crisis that has been
stalking it ever since it came to power, in the wake of the stock market
crash of spring 2000. Bush and his people must move as quickly as
possible to get the worst over with, in their own terms (terms
distorted by their own illusions of being in control of events).before
they have to face new elections or other political challenges. (Had
Kerry won, his incoming government might well be facing a worse
crisis, compounded by international uncertainty over various
policies.) In recent weeks, the dollar crisis, which is merely
the immediate visible face of a profound social and economic crisis in
progress for decades, has moved (once again) from technical discussions
of a marginal coterie of specialists to center stage in the media.
Prominent pro-capitalist economists such as Steve Roach and Paul
Krugman are now saying that a major crisis is almost inevitable, more a
question of when than if. This is particularly revealing in light of
the fact that in eight or nine months of almost constant media huffing
and puffing about the election, this reality and the issues it raises
were precisely nowhere in the discussion. Ever since the 1960's, when
the problematic international status of the dollar became an ongoing
policy question (with its ebbs and flows) no mainstream American
politician has ever gone anywhere near it. It is more of a political
third rail than Social Security or Medicare (1)

  Unfortunately, the same thing can be said, with some honorable
exceptions, about the radical left.in the U.S.

  A capitalist crisis like the current one resembles a poker game where
the table is swept clean and all cards and chips must be redistributed
for the game to continue at all. This could happen as an orderly
bankruptcy proceeding but it will most likely happen (as it has always
happened in the past) chaotically, through economic blowout, class
confrontation, and war. (Only the latter options create the momentum
and the constituency for the necessary changes.) This crisis will in
all likelihood not come in a pure, 1929-style form of abrupt
deflation, stock market crash, and sudden mass unemployment (though some
combination of these is a distinct possibility). What somehow has to
happen, from a capitalist point of view, is a serious devaluation of the
approximately $11 trillion dollars currently held by foreigners, and a
simultaneous adjustment of major currencies to reflect new world
economic realities. The dollar must be dethroned from its global reserve
currency status (about 63% of all central bank reserves are currently
denominated in dollars, down from 69% a year ago), or reduced to one
among many alongside the euro, the yen, or possibly some basket of
major currencies. The U.S. must stop running $600 billion in annual
balance-of-payments deficits, drawing in 80% of the world's savings to
finance them. It must deflate the approximately (outstanding) $33
trillion of Federal, state, municipal, corporate and personal debt (3
times the dubious GDP figure) that has kept the economy going for
decades. This will entail, among other things, a collapse of the huge
mortgage bubble and the subsequent bankruptcy of untold millions of
families and individuals. The U.S. must figure out a way to balance
imports and exports, which, given the vast hollowing out of U.S.
industry over the past 35 years,