shac7 and electronic civil disobedience

2006-02-22 Thread lotu5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

The shac 7 case is very alarming. From what I've gathered, these people
are facing serious prison time for operating websites that promote
direct action against a corporation that does testing on animals. I
wonder when we'll be facing jail time for linking to "digitally
incorrect" websites, like sherman austin did.

"Specifically, these activists are alleged to have operated a website
that reported on and expressed ideological support for protest activity
against Huntingdon and its business affiliates. For this they are
charged with "terrorism" and face an aggregate of 23 years in Federal
Prison

The highlight of the week is when  the government called a 20 year old
activist from Ohio who was "caught" participating in an electronic civil
disobedience (ECD) (the act of visiting a website with special software
designed to overflow a server's bandwidth and effectively crash the
site) and who sent black faxes. Undoubtedly, the government expected him
to testify that SHAC USA and/or its website caused him to do these
things. Instead, he repeatedly said he learned about it from other
places, participated in the actions on his own freewill, and none of the
defendants had anything to do with his actions. When asked why he had
sent the black faxes, he said that he was angry after watching the
undercover footage at HLS where workers are hurting beagles."

http://www.shac7.com

- --

encrypted mail preferred // gpg key id 0x250E12BF
gpg howto: http://dudu.dyn.2-h.org/nist/gpg-enigmail-howto
//
blog: http://deleteTheBorder.org/lotu5
radio Antifascista podcast: http://deletetheborder.org/node/543
//
http://sdhacklab.org
http://deleteTheBorder.org || http://organiccollective.org
http://sandiego.indymedia.org || http://radioActiveradio.org


-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFD+7wmNyP5liUOEr8RAh+aAJ4rwZ7RGAB1ZmPewV9T1tu9BqUR7wCbBDZi
nEwobAb5zJhzKwkEZCYgC3Y=
=95gB
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



#  distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#   is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net


Re: Netbase (1995-2006)

2006-02-22 Thread Brian Holmes
I would just like to thank all the people who founded, worked at and closely
collaborated with the former Public Netbase, for having created and maintained 
one
of the most advanced centers for internet experimentation, intellectual inquiry,
activism and art tout court.

In my experience this was consistently the most interesting place of its kind,
where it was always possible to have a discussion that took you beyond what you
knew or had done, and into the deeper reality of the present. It was also the 
most
irreverent place imaginable, one of the few public institutions that could claim
to have a sense of humor and that took intelligent delight in proving it over 
and
over again.

That such an operation should be treated as the establishment has traditionally
treated the avant-garde - by fearing and despising it, or just by torpidly
ignoring its qualities and allowing it to disappear for want of the most minimal
support - is a sad commentary on the degree of conformism that still prevails in
our decaying societies.

once again, thanks to all,

Brian


#  distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#   is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net


The Tlaxcala Manifesto (Translators' Network for Linguistic Diversity)

2006-02-22 Thread Patrice Riemens
TLAXCALA'S MANIFESTO

by the Translators of Tlaxcala


Las lenguas de Tlaxcala, por Juan Kalvellido


Tlaxcala, the network for linguistic diversity, was founded on December 2005 by 
a
small group of cyberactivists who knew one another through Internet and 
discovered
that they shared common interests, common dreams and common problems. The 
network
quickly grew, has today [...] members, and translates into [...] languages. This
Manifesto, approved by them all, expresses their common philosophy:

All languages of the world must, and do contribute to the brotherhood of 
mankind.
Contrary to what many people used to believe, a language is not only a 
grammatical
structure, a set of interconnected words, in agreementwith a syntactic code, but
also, and especially, a creation of meaning based upon our senses. Thus we 
observe,
interpret and express our world from a specific personal, geographical and 
political
context. Because of this, no language is neutral, and they all carry the 
'genetic
code', the imprint of the cultures to which they belong. Latin, the first 
imperial
language, reached its high point by trampling on the remains of the languages it
destroyed as the Roman legions extended their presence to the south of Europe, 
the
north of Africa and the Middle East. It is not strange if at the beginning of 
the
Renaissance it was the Spanish language, a genetic daughter of Latin, which 
brought
about new devastation, this time among the conquered peoples of the American
continent.

An empire and its language always go together and are predators by definition. 
They
reject otherness. Any imperial language constitutes itself as the subject of 
History,
narrates it from its point of view and annihilates (or tries to do so) the 
points of
view of languages it considers inferior. The official History of any empire is 
never
innocent,but motivated by the zeal to justify yesterday.s acts today in order to
project its own version upon tomorrow.

Nobody knows what suffering the peoples conquered by the Roman Empire endured, 
since
there is no written record of their defeat, which meant the disappearance of 
their
cultures. Conversely, the languages of the American continent conquered by the
Spanish Empire left their testimony. Towards the second half of the 16th 
Century,
shortly after the conquest of Mexico, Brother Bernardino de Sahag=FAn assembled 
what
it is known today as The Florentine Codex, a mixture of N=E1hua tales 
(N=E1huatl is
the language of the most ancient Aztecs, still spoken in Mexico) and pictorial
illustrations that describe pre-Hispanic society and culture. The second 
testimony,
which contradicts the first one, is The Lienzo de Tlaxcala, also transcribed 
during
the 16th Century by the mixed race Diego Mu=F1oz de Camargo, who based his 
story upon
the fresco paintings by his ancestors .the Tlaxcaltecan nobility . who 
described in
images both Hern=E1n Cort=E9s.s arrival and the fall of Tenochtitlan, the 
capital of
the Aztec Empire, destroyed by the Conquistadors who replaced it with the city 
of
Mexico. Tlaxcala was at the time the Tenochtitlan Aztec empire.s rival 
city-stateand
aided Cort=E9s in destroying it, an attitude that was akin to drawingup its own
death sentence, since the new Spanish Empire which was born of that defeat 
subjugated
all the native, so-called pre-Columbian peoples . whether they were allies or 
enemies
of the Spanish Crown, resulting in analmost complete loss of their cultures and
languages.

In our days, the imperial power is based in the United States of America,whose
official language is English. Faithful to the behavioural characteristics of any
empire, the English language now imposes its law. Under the influence of 
English,
entire countries or territories have lost- or are in the process of losing - 
their
communicational languages. The Philippines or Puerto Rico are only two examples 
among
many. In sub-Saharan Africa the false prestige accorded to English, French, 
Portuguese
or majority vernacular languages is killing one local mother tongue every two 
weeks
according to UNESCO.

It is true that in these times of global communication there is nothing 
negative in
having a lingua franca to facilitate mutual knowledge, but itbecomes quite 
negative
if it either consciously or unconsciously transmits the ideology of superiority 
that
characterizes it, and does so by exhibiting its scorn for the 'subordinate' 
languages,
i.e., all the others. The superiority complex which always accompanies an 
imperial or
imperially-dependent language is so consubstantial to its essence that today it 
even
happens among Anglophone activists engaged in the struggle for a better world: 
their
media is a tangible proof that the writings they publish translated from the
'subordinate' languages constitute only an insignificant percentage of their 
contents.
It is not only the fact that translations from English into other languages are 
so
appallingly numerous in comparison, bu

Citizen Lab releases Psiphon

2006-02-22 Thread Geert Lovink
Hi, has anyone tried this one out yet? I wonder how many nettimers keep 
track what Citizenlab is doing and if you are, like me, also promoting 
things like www.ngoinabox.org. /geert

---

OLIVER MOORE
Toronto Globe & Mail
Monday, February 13, 2006

TORONTO -- More than fifteen years after the Berlin Wall was shattered 
with hammers and bulldozers, a Canadian-designed computer program is 
preparing to break through what activists call the great firewall of 
China.

The program, in the late stages of development in a University of 
Toronto office, is designed to help those trapped behind the blocking 
and filtering systems set up by restrictive governments. If successful, 
it will equip volunteers in more open countries to help those on the 
other side of digital barriers, allowing a free flow of information and 
news into and out of even the most closed societies.

The program is part of a quiet war over freedom of information. Even as 
countries considered repressive, such as China, North Korea, Iran and 
Saudi Arabia, pour money into stopping the free exchange of data, small 
groups of activists keep looking for ways around the technological 
barriers.

At the University of Toronto, in the small basement office of Citizen 
Lab, researchers are getting ready for the release of Psiphon, the 
latest weapon in the fight.

"I was always interested in the idea of using computers for social and 
political change," said Nart Villeneuve, who has been dabbling with the 
project for about two years. "It was a matter of creating a program for 
really non-technical people that was easy and effective."

Psiphon is designed to eliminate a drawback of anti-filter programs: 
incriminating the users behind the firewall. If found by authorities, 
that anti-filter software can lead to coercive interrogation, a bid to 
uncover the suspect's Internet travel secrets using a tactic known to 
insiders as "rubber-hose cryptoanalysis."

Mr. Villeneuve built a system that won't leave dangerous footprints on 
computers. In simple terms, it works by giving monitored computer users 
a way to send an encrypted request for information to a computer 
located in a secure country. That computer finds the information and 
sends it back, also encrypted.

An elegant wrinkle is that the data will enter users' machines through 
computer port 443. Relied on for the secure transfer of data, this port 
is the one through whichreams of financial data stream constantly 
around the world.
"Unless a country wanted to cut off all connections for any financial 
transactions they wouldn't be able to cut off these transmissions," 
said Professor Ronald Deibert, the director of Citizen Lab.

A drawback to Psiphon is that the person behind the firewall has to be 
given a user name and password by the person offering up the computer. 
With this kind of setup, Mr. Villeneuve said, activists may end up 
working with specific dissidents and people in repressive countries may 
rely on relatives abroad to help them get connected. Canadians, with 
ties to every country in the world, are in a particularly good position 
to use such a system.

Although this reduces the program's reach, a relationship-based system 
could also minimize improper use. People who know the owner of their 
proxy computer are less likely to abuse their system, the logic goes.

"The big novel thing here is that you have a one-to-one connection," 
said Danny O'Brien, activism co-ordinator at the Electronic Frontier 
Foundation, a San Francisco-based group. "That's a great innovation, 
because so many people have computers that are always on, and this lets 
you deal with someone you can trust."

If the remote user begins to view illegal material, their access can be 
limited in several ways, such as allowing access to text only. In 
extreme cases, Mr. Villeneuve said, people found with evidence of 
illegal activity on their computer would be able to prove through 
forensic analysis that it had been done by the remote user.

The team at Citizen Lab is now racing to put the final touches on the 
program in time for its public debut at the international congress of 
the free-speech group PEN in May. Billed as a uniquely Canadian 
approach to "hactivism," the first generation of Psiphon will then be 
made publicly available.

Its release is set to come against a backdrop of ever-diminishing free 
access to the Internet. Just last month the popular search engine 
Google agreed to self-censor, restricting access to certain content and 
websites in order to gain access to the Chinese market.

Sharon Hom, executive director of Human Rights in China, an 
international NGO, said the country has managed to create "a culture of 
fear and self-censorship." They are helped, she added, by Western 
countries willing to sell Internet-monitoring equipment to Beijing and 
bend to its terms.

Mr. O'Brien noted that public knowledge of monitoring can have as major 
an effect as the surveillance itself.

"You don't