nettime re: Important Thai education site closed

2006-10-05 Thread Geert Lovink
 From: somkiat tangnamo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Oct 1, 2006 2:54 AM
 Subject: Statement of the Midnight University

 Statement of the Midnight University

 Opposing the Closure of Channels of Free Communication

 Beginning on Friday September 29th, the Midnight University's website 
 has been blocked by the Ministry of Information and Communication 
 Technology (ICT), Thailand. However, ours was not the first one to be 
 blocked or tampered with by the power of the Coup Council. The 
 Midnight University's considered reaction to the September 19 th coup 
 is strong disapproval of such a reckless solution to the nation's 
 political problems. Nonetheless, we also realize that it is too late 
 to reverse it and the only way out is to lend a hand in pushing our 
 country back onto the path of democratic development.

 The Council for Democratic Reform (CDR) has claimed that this coup is 
 the beginning of a political reform process which includes the 
 drafting of a new constitution. And yet, the provisions concerning the 
 drafting of a new constitution and political reform in the Provisional 
 Constitution of the CDR do not allow the full and free exercise of 
 political rights and civil liberties by the people, which is the key 
 condition for a successful political reform. Popular participation 
 does not simply mean being selected to sit in a constituent assembly, 
 but also denotes the opportunity for mutual learning and free exchange 
 of ideas. Therefore, an atmosphere of subjection and control by the 
 military under the CDR will rule out any possibility of genuine 
 political reform.

 For that reason, the Midnight University held a press conference on 
 September 28th, to oppose the political reform process as stipulated 
 in the Provisional Constitution and propose an alternative that would 
 allow for the full restitution of rights and liberties to the people. 
 To get our point across, we performed a symbolic act of tearing up 
 copies of the Provisional Constitution and posted a report of the said 
 event on the Midnight University's website.

 Hence, the ICT's immediate imposition of a blockage on our website.

 Actually, it is not hard for the Midnight University to overcome this 
 technical difficulty. We have indeed received various offers from 
 foreign servers to host our website. Be that as it may, we are of the 
 opinion that the problem of availability of a public space is not 
 technical in nature, but essentially political. And it has arisen 
 because the self-proclaimed Council for Democratic Reform has used 
 its coup-begotten power to impose a blockage on public space. 
 Therefore, we need to fight this illegitimate power together right 
 here in this land rather than evade it and find a new public space 
 elsewhere.

 As the Midnight University has earlier warned, political reform 
 couldn't be realized in an atmosphere shorn of people's rights and 
 liberties. That the Coup Council has thoughtlessly closed down 
 websites that expressed dissenting views on the coup shows that it is 
 incapable of leading a political reform that is free and equally open 
 to all. To bring this power to an end peacefully, Thai society must 
 not submit to it. Instead, we should together pressure it to stop the 
 violation of people's rights and liberties at once.

 It is true that, given freedom, there will be some who would exploit 
 it to try to destroy or disrupt political reform. And yet, only the 
 full exercise of rights and liberties can enlighten and empower a 
 society to fight the lies and half-truths of corrupt politicians 
 seeking a return to power. On the contrary, a society whose learning 
 and communication is kept under tutelage will remain weak and unable 
 to resist them.

 In place of an arbitrary and selective censorship based on a 
 subjective feeling of distrust and animosity of the censors, the 
 complete and indiscriminate opening of all channels of communication 
 will result in a free, fair and predictable rule of the game for all, 
 thus rectifying the arbitrary, unchecked and uncontrolled exercise of 
 power that is a major weakness of all coup-makers. By guaranteeing the 
 equal rights and liberties of the people to information, the Coup 
 Council will be able to tap into the real source of power far greater 
 than whatever it can get from its illegitimate coup.
 30 September 2006


#  distributed via nettime: no commercial use without permission
#  nettime is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
#  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
#  more info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] and info nettime-l in the msg body
#  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime@bbs.thing.net


nettime Re: Important Thai education site closed

2006-10-04 Thread ericbj

 This is not in any way to concur with the closure of The Midnight
 University Website, far from it, but rather to give a different
 perspective to the coup to that presented in some of the western
 media.

 The King of Thailand who has spoken and acted in favour of democracy
 was almost certainly aware that the coup was about to happen, and the
 new interim prime minister is a general who has in the past spoken
 out in favour of democracy and against military coups.

 Thaksin, a couple of years ago, stated to the Thai public: Democracy
 is like a Rolls Royce. The Thai people do not need a Rolls Royce.

  Hitler was also democratically elected. Unfortunately, the military
  coups against him failed.

  Below is a posting to the Burma newsgroups from an American living
  in Thailand.

  Regards,
  Eric




DICTATOR WATCH
 (www.dictatorwatch.org)

 Contact: Roland Watson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 THAILAND?S MIDDLE WAY

 September 25, 2006

 Please forward.


 Last week, the Thai Military ousted caretaker Prime Minister
 Thaksin Shinawatra. As a longstanding and strong critic of Thaksin,
 Dictator Watch is pleased to see him go. It was imperative that his
 destruction of Thai democracy and his splitting of Thai society come
 to an end. He had organized violence against the People?s Alliance
 for Democracy (for their planned demonstration last Wednesday)
 as a prelude to declaring a state of emergency and subsequently
 banning public dissent and also purging the armed forces of its last
 professional officers. Thaksin was about to complete his long-term
 plan to become the absolute ruler of Thailand.

 Had the military not acted, the only possibility to remove him
 from power would have been a large-scale popular mobilization.
 But given the level of control that he was about to achieve and
 his predilection for violence, it is certain that this would have
 been violently suppressed. The people of Thailand would have found
 themselves in a similar situation to the repressed population in
 Burma. Than Shwe and the SPDC are not only Thaksin?s allies and
 business partners, they are also his role models.

 The Armed Forces had a choice. They could have allowed themselves
 to be purged, while pro-democracy demonstrators were killed.
 Alternatively, they could have assassinated Thaksin. (They have this
 power, although as police behavior has since confirmed, the bomb
 plot that supposedly existed against him was obviously a fraud,
 orchestrated by his supporters.)

 Thailand is predominantly Buddhist. While it seems counterintuitive,
 the coup to remove Thaksin was a middle way solution, since it
 enabled political change without violence. The most important
 immediate responsibility of the Council for Democratic Reform under
 Constitutional Monarchy (CDRM) is to keep things this way: to guard
 against violence organized by Thaksin?s cronies.

 CDRM has also pledged, and has already taken the first steps, to
 reinstall democratic government. They must fulfill this pledge or
 their popular support will end and the PAD will be undoubtedly be
 reformed.

 Many foreign governments and other organizations denounced the coup.
 They either did this to be politically correct, to protect perceived
 economic interests, or because they did not fully understand the
 situation inside the country. For the last, simplistic comments from
 many analysts revealed their ignorance of what was about to happen
 last Wednesday.

 Further, Thaksin was never democratically elected. This implies
 that the rule of law has been upheld, and in Thailand it was not.
 The Thai Constitution and its system of checks and balances first
 failed when he was found innocent in the assets concealment case.
 There should have been massive demonstrations or other strong steps
 at that time, rather than waiting five years. He should never have
 had the opportunity to drag Thailand to the bottom of the cesspool of
 political corruption. Everything he did was anathema to democracy.

 CDRM has also announced that it will be a year before new elections.
 The reason for the lengthy period is that the Thaksin regime and the
 Thai Rak Thai party must be comprehensively eradicated, such that
 they can never return. This will take time. Thaksin and his gang have
 done so much wrong that dozens of investigations, regarding both
 human rights abuses and financial corruption, need to be opened, and
 result in charges being filed and court convictions. The Thaksin
 family should be stripped of its illegal wealth, with Thaksin himself
 personally found guilty of numerous charges.

 Ultimately, the real problem is not the Constitution. Thailand is
 a formative democracy, and the people of the country are still
 learning their obligations under the system. You do not cast a vote,
 particularly a vote for which you have been paid, and then ignore
 everything else that happens and hope for the best. No constitution
 can withstand a man like Thaksin, if the people allow it.