< http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/41/4167.asp >
TheNewspaper.com: A Journal of Driving and Politics
Home > Camera Enforcement > Speed Cameras > DC, Maryland: Speed Camera
Firms Move To Hide Evidence
DC, Maryland: Speed Camera Firms Move To Hide Evidence
Afraid of refunds, Washington, DC and Salisbury, Maryland conceal
evidence that could reveal camera inaccuracy.
[Cropped camera photo] The firms operating red light cameras and speed
cameras in the District of Columbia and Maryland are working to
suppress evidence that could be used to prove the innocence of a photo
enforcement ticket recipient. In Washington, the Arizona-based vendor
American Traffic Solutions has repositioned cameras and cropped photos
so that it is impossible to determine whether another object or vehicle
happens to be within the radar unit's field of view.
The change is important since DC hearing adjudicators have been
throwing out citations whenever another vehicle was visible, creating
the possibility of a spurious radar reading (view ruling). The
cropping also makes it extremely difficult to use pavement lines to
perform a secondary check of the speed estimate provided by the radar.
Lines painted on the road for this purpose are visible in one photo,
but not the other (view first photo, view second photo). No
video is provided to the vehicle owner.
The District has also recently been installing next-generation speed
cameras that use infrared light instead of a visible flash when
photographing vehicles. This means drivers will have no way of knowing
whether they will receive a ticket until weeks after the alleged
violation.
In Salisbury, Maryland, the city and its private speed camera
contractor Brekford are working together to prevent the Maryland
Drivers Alliance from confirming whether the photo enforcement program
is in compliance with state law. There is good reason to believe it is
not, as other towns that allow Brekford to issue tickets, including
Greenbelt and Hagerstown, have been forced to refund illegally
issued citations.
At issue is whether Brekford's cameras were properly certified under
Maryland Code Section 21-809, which requires testing on an annual basis
by an independent lab. The law states that the results of such testing
"shall be kept on file" along with a daily setup log. The
Maryland-based motoring rights group simply asked for a copy of the
file. The city and camera company now insist that the group must pay
$535 to the speed camera contractor for the calibration certificates
and logs that the municipality is required to keep on file. These are
documents that the State Highway Administration makes freely available
on its website.
"In regards to this request, it is anticipated to take six total hours
to gather and assemble the requested documents," Brekford wrote in a
July 16 letter to the Salisbury police chief. "The first two hours will
be provided without charge, however the addition four hours shall be
charged at the rate of $75.00 per hour. An additional $235.00 will be
charged for the copying and mailing services rendered in providing the
requested information. Additionally, Brekford does not release or
provide technical specifications on any of our camera systems."
The city also delayed responding to the request for thirty days, which
the motorist group says is one of many violations of the state's public
records laws. The refusal to provide basic specifications regarding the
camera's operation is also raising eyebrows.
"Basically they are saying the public is just supposed to 'trust us'
when Brekford says their equipment is of a sort which is reliable,
since they are withholding all documents which describe the
technology," said Ron Ely, the Maryland Drivers Alliance chairman.
# distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l
# archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
