Re: made for TV, made for social media
> On Jan 7, 2021, at 2:59 PM, Molly Hankwitz wrote: > > And, once Trump is out, many of the worst will crawl back into their lairs > and breed little swastikas. (I looked but did not see any swastikas in the > crowd). A "Camp Auschwitz" T-shirt with (an English translation of) "Arbeit Macht Frei" comes pretty close: https://forward.com/fast-forward/461617/auschwitz-shirt-capitol-mob-nazi-antisemitism/ --Dave. -- Dave Mandl david.ma...@gmail.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
"Data Mining for Humanists" (review of Lev Manovich's "Cultural Analytics")
By me, in the Los Angeles Review of Books (no paywall): https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/data-mining-for-humanists/ IN THE LAST 20 YEARS or so, several factors have combined to make it possible to gather and analyze vast amounts of digital information, far larger than any datasets that could be processed previously. The ever-increasing speed of computer networks and the plummeting cost of storage make data collection on a colossal scale much easier, and new "Big Data"-specific technologies and algorithms enable us to digest, filter, and crunch this mountain of information with little effort. At the same time, with the spread of internet use to more or less everyone, and an increasing number of activities conducted online -- shopping, chatting, watching videos, creating and sharing cultural artifacts -- the data and contextual "metadata" from all these activities are being made available (either voluntarily or unwittingly) to a slew of commercial and marketing enterprises and academic and research institutions. Working on the assumption that this particular glass is half full (an arguably flawed assumption, but we'll put that aside for the moment), Lev Manovich, in his new book "Cultural Analytics," focuses on the positive side of Big Data, specifically how the new techniques and technologies can be used to advance our knowledge of culture, or even reshape culture for the better. The lab Manovich runs at UC San Diego aims to use methods from computer science, data visualization, and media art to analyze contemporary media and users' interactions with it. He also hopes to change how we view culture, both figuratively and literally, in ways that are hard to predict and will continue to take shape as we continue to corral the data digitally. "The scale of culture in the twenty-first century," Manovich writes, "makes it impossible to see it with existing methods." Which raises the question, "How can we see (for example) one billion images?" We all know, more or less, how to look at and assess a single painting, but how do we "look at" a billion of them -- a kind of exercise that is completely new to the human race? And what will be revealed when we do? What can we hope to find out? [--SNIP--] -- Dave Mandl dma...@panix.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
Re: Richard Stallman: Eradicate Facebook!
> On Mar 20, 2016, at 6:43 AM, Patrice Riemens wrote: > > For Stallman, proprietary software is a fundamental obstacle to > freedom since the editor is able to decide the content, functionality, > impose censorship or deploy at will update. I realize that this is a short interview, but I almost wish Stallman hadn't mentioned free software (his particular obsession, obviously, and a reasonable one), which could overshadow some much more basic concerns with FB. Using proprietary software is one thing--maybe it's inherently evil, maybe not--and collecting data on people's every movement is another. It's conceivable, just slightly, that Facebook could open-source all their software and not change their behavior a bit. If someone really wants to smother you, they can probably smother you with a cute photo of a kitten. --Dave. # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
Re: 'Charging Bull' vs 'Fearless Girl'
"Ludicrous" is right. - "Fearless Girl" is basically an ad for an index fund created by a large Wall St. firm (State Street), one that, if I remember correctly, is even less diverse than most. Easier to commission a statue than hire more women. - The "Charging Bull" statue was a piece of guerrilla art, "installed" without permission in the middle of the night. The city was furious and was about to remove it, but public outcry (and maybe a publicity campaign by the artist, I don't know) forced them to change their mind, at which point they embraced it, declared what an important artwork it was, etc. Now guerrilla artist is hiring high-powered lawyers to protect his turf. --Dave. > On Apr 13, 2017, at 5:32 AM, Felix Stalder wrote: > > [This is a trivial but highly entertaining story. What makes it > entertaining is that all actors makes grandiose claims about art, > politics and whatnot, and all of them are completely ludicrous. Fake > news doesn't even scratch the surface, it's fake reality! Felix] > > 'Charging Bull' sculptor calls for New York to remove 'Fearless Girl' statue <...> -- Dave Mandl david.ma...@gmail.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
Re: New "thought rhythms'
This has been going on forever in popular music--maybe *all* music, and probably all art, for that matter. Every new musical generation that comes along inevitably has some spokespeople who really want you to know that the previous generations, especially the generation they're bent on displacing, are a bunch of dinosaurs and jokers. "Get out of the way!" You can practically set your watch by it. Sometimes the revolutionaries show how revolutionary they are by re-making a dinosaur classic in the new style-that-will-live forever. I put together a piece on this subject for the Rumpus a few years ago, though it appears the YouTube links are now broken. The affectless, cold-wave Flying Lizards doing the R&B classic "Money," Riot Grrrls Lunachicks eviscerating cock-rock neanderthals Bad Company, Sid Vicious doing *Sinatra* (OMFG): https://therumpus.net/2012/10/heres-what-we-think-of-your-classic/ I would also claim that insurmountable differences between warring musical schools often get flattened out over time, so that twenty years later people can't understand what all the fighting was about. But that's another story. --Dave. > On Oct 4, 2017, at 5:58 AM, David Garcia > wrote: > > > New "thought rhythms'- announce the fact that Rock (including Punk) is dead. > > The old rhymes of largely white indy (largely white) guitar bands superseded > by Hip Hop and Grime.. > As my kids grow up I realise that though I can hear that the UK movement > Grime and US Hip Hop > are powerful .. on some level honestly.. deep in my bones.. I just don't get > it yet. I'm stuck in the past. > > This sensation was summed up in recent essay by Martin Amis who asserts that > it is natural that older > writers should find younger writers irritating because younger writers are > sending them an un-welcome message .. > they are saying its not like that anymore its like this”.. he goes on that in > the present context “that and this” can be > loosely described as the –thought rhythms- peculiar to the time-.. I love the > term "thought rhythms".. It crystallises > what we respond to in writing and indeed any art form. As implicit in the > "thought rhythms” peculiar to any era are the > distinctive values, moral, social and aesthetic.. And is it too pessimistic > for me to feel that when they move on they > move on they leave previous generations floundering or worse still faking an > appreciation they don't actually feel. > > Don’t try to dig what we all s-s-say. > # distributed via : no commercial use without permission > #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, > # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets > # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l > # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org > # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: -- Dave Mandl david.ma...@gmail.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
Re: Rapture billboard
Hi Patrice-- I think you're giving these people more credit than they deserve. The Neocons, whatever you think of their politics, are a pretty sophisticated bunch. The idea of the Rapture is generally associated with a crackpot (albeit growing) group of Bible Belt fundamentalists from a whole different universe. True, they've mostly been allied with the right wing of the Republican party, but it's a marriage of convenience for the Neocons. The Republicans have thrown crumbs to the religious right to gain their support politically (a brilliant and mostly successful strategy), but they surely roll their eyes at these yokels behind closed doors. Most Neocons are way more socially liberal than this Bible Belt crowd. I suspect a lot of them couldn't care less about abortion or homosexuality, and would laugh themselves silly at ideas like the Rapture. Regards, --Dave. On May 30, 2011, at 3:48 AM, Patrice Riemens wrote: > The 'rapture' monicker (in) itself is fairly old hat in the US, I > remember it was a recurrent theme during Reagan's presidency, and that > it generally is a specific, if somewhat weird, underground part of the > neo-con credo. <...> -- Dave Mandl dma...@panix.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://www.wfmu.org/~davem Twitter: http://twitter.com/dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
The brutal truth about software
My latest piece for the Register: "There’s a kind of cognitive dissonance in most people who’ve moved from the academic study of computer science to a job as a real-world software developer. The conflict lies in the fact that, whereas nearly every sample program in every textbook is a perfect and well-thought-out specimen, virtually no software out in the wild is, and this is rarely acknowledged. "To be precise: a tremendous amount of source code written for real applications is not merely less perfect than the simple examples seen in school--it’s outright terrible by any number of measures." http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/12/21/financial_software_disasters/ -- Dave Mandl dma...@panix.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
Re: bitcoin anyone?
This is what happens when you've got a socialist in the White House. --Dave. On Apr 11, 2013, at 10:32 AM, "Keith J. Sanborn" wr= ote: > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-22105322 > > So much for utterly stable market dynamics. # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
FCC chairman personally grants exemption from obscenity rules to patriots
...or maybe all people who "speak from the heart." --- = http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/fcc-chair-endorses-red-sox-f-b= omb Boston Red Sox slugger David Ortiz got the Federal Communications = Commission's seal of approval after he dropped an F-bomb in a pre-game = speech that was broadcast on live television. Ortiz's R-rated remarks = were delivered on the field at Fenway Park before the first Red Sox home = game since Monday's bombing at the Boston Marathon.=20 "This is our fucking city," Ortiz said. "And nobody gonna dictate our = freedom. Stay strong. Thank you." The FCC regulates "obscenity, indecency and profanity" on radio and = television and often issues fines for on-air swearing. However, FCC = Chairman Julius Genachowski issued a statement of support for Ortiz on = the agency's official Twitter account after the game. "David Ortiz spoke from the heart at today's Red Sox game. I stand with = Big Papi and the people of Boston," Genachowski wrote. -- Dave Mandl dma...@panix.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
Re: Death of a Hospital
I take it you haven't seen this: = http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324263404578614183479259720.= html (Executive summary: Brooklyn-based couple, old friends of and early investors with Warren Buffett, die leaving close to a billion dollars, ***$135M*** of which they leave to LICH. LICH successfully twists the conditions of the donation to misuse the money, goes broke anyway due to corruption and mismanagement.) On Jul 30, 2013, at 2:29 AM, Alan Sondheim wrote: > Death of a Hospital > > Today we went to the LICH, Long Island College Hospital, for > neurology issues. The hospital is being closed down so developers > can build condominiums there. In our area there are seven 30+ > storey buildings, condominiums scheduled for the next few years. > Current condos go for around $700,000 for a one bedroom. The > hospital has been the scene of protests in recent months; it > serves a large number of neighborhoods and in particular seems to > serve minorities. [snip] -- Dave Mandl dma...@panix.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
"Modern Computer Systems Are Complex - Film at 11"
Lots of interesting things going on here: http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/aug/23/nasdaq-crash-data Anyone who has worked on an electronic trading system and didn't see this coming shouldn't be allowed to work on electronic trading systems. As a technologist I actually found working on these kinds of systems uninteresting and often frightening. Its clear that they are simply too complex for comfort--I'd say that many of the biggest systems are literally beyond the ken of *anyone*, even the smartest programmers. There are too many thousands of moving parts, too much spit and scotch tape, too many barely compatible components written by a dozen people of varying skill levels who left the company three years ago. AFAIC it's always been a matter of when, not if. Systems 1/100 the complexity of Nasdaq's have problems all the time that you'll never hear about. Supporting one of these beasts is like being in charge of a hundred kittens, making sure they all stay exactly where they're supposed to at all times. Side note: Interesting how everyone quoted in the article blames this mess on their favorite villain, including Big Data, which has nothing to do with the Wall Street failures (and probably not the others, either). I won't blow my own horn and mention this vaguely related piece I wrote for the Register last year: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/12/21/financial_software_disasters/ Oops. A good weekend to all of you. --Dave. -- Dave Mandl dma...@panix.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
Re: "Modern Computer Systems Are Complex - Film at 11"
Hi Keith-- Thanks. That article was years in the making, meaning I'd been developing those ideas for a long time before I finally got the opportunity to get them down on paper. Those are good analogies, and I've thought about various others. Most important, to oversimplify slightly, people get lazy, bored, and complacent over time, and their "product" suffers as a result. One of my thoughts on 9/11 was that those things will happen just because it's impossible to be vigilant every minute of the day. Condeleezza Rice gets a memo saying "Bin Laden Determined to Attack the US" and basically ignores it because she gets memos like that all the time. She "knows" deep down that Bin Laden isn't going to attack the US, and that response works 99.9% of the time. Programmers know (or should know) about weak points in their code and just tell themselves, "Ah, it's OK," and it *is* OK until... Computer systems do decay over time, because people take shortcuts or patch things together in sloppy ways, or because one guy who worked on the system didn't really know what he was doing, so the pieces of the system that he wrote are precarious, if anyone can even understand them. I really think many computer systems are just too big and complex--there's pretty much no guarantee that something won't blow up one day. Or it's guaranteed that something will, but people assume that it'll be something small and harmless. Cheers, --Dave. On Aug 24, 2013, at 6:21 AM, Keith Sanborn wrote: > Both are good articles. IMHO, yours is the better one as it speaks > from grim experience rather than making a pastiche of famous names > and sexy quotes. I had read your piece when you first posted it. > It squares clearly with what I know from small experience using > assembly language years ago and from many cautionary tales I have > heard over the years: the uncommented code is not worth writing. <> -- Dave Mandl dma...@panix.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
Re: The secret financial market only robots can see
To restate what Brian wrote, in five times as many words: I think it's easy (and *usually* reasonable) to say, "This thing that's happening now, and the backlash against it, is just like such-and-such a thing that happened 100 years ago, and all that fuss turned out to be very silly." So, whenever someone says, "Everything used to be so wonderful (especially when I was young). The whole world's going down the toilet now!" it's a good idea to point out that people in Chaucer's and Plautus's times were saying the exact same thing. People in the Old Testament got all teary-eyed for the good old days. One contemporary example is the ever-popular "buggy-whip manufacturer," an analogy loved by Libertarian types. "Science matches on! There will always be people clinging to a useless, outdated past. We've seen this again and again. Deal with it--and learn HTML5." Another is GMOs, where some people make the argument that, when you get right down to it, inserting pig genes into a tomato is really not all that different from transplanting a bean plant with a pair of household scissors. (This is a deliberately extreme example. No need to point that out.) Another might be the sexualization of children. If I note that explicit videos, sexting, and all the rest are bad for kids you could make the argument that this is no different from the fuss about Elvis or women wearing dresses above the knee, and we all know how ridiculous those controversies turned out to be. But is it possible that the thing happening now might really be qualitatively different from the "identical" thing that happened 100 years ago? I think it's important to leave that possibility open, though we know that being "objective" about the world we're immersed in is basically impossible. Maybe 999,999 times out of a million you're just being old and crabby. But there can be that one time where things really did take a permanent turn for the worse, and being able to spot that, or at least try to, is crucial. Did all the supposed horrors of Reaganism turn out to be a big nothing in light of Bushism? ("Reagan would be considered a liberal Democrat today!") Is what's happening now with financial markets, income inequality, and the rest of it the same old thing we saw in the late 19th century and the 1920s--both of which we "recovered" from? I'd at least entertain the possibility that what's going on with financial markets now is qualitatively different and in some ways irreversible *given the corporate and government structures in place today*. And btw, I also think sexualization of kids in the early 21st c. is a very real and frightening problem (and I'm allegedly a Reichian). So getting back to the subject at hand, I think algorithmic trading was destined to "fail" in the long term, the same way interest-rate arbitrage and early program-trading in the '80s eventually "failed." By definition, the way these things work is: (1) I come up with a formula that takes advantage of some "inefficiency" in the financial markets; (2) I and a few other early adopters print money for a few years trading on that; (3) everyone else catches on, and an arms race begins; (4) that inefficiency disappears because everyone's doing the same thing; (5) a bunch of people take a bath--perhaps taking the economy down with them, but that's another story; and (6) we dump this losers' strategy, go back to (1), and start again. I think a lot of what's happened in the markets recently really is qualitatively different, and algorithmic trading is an example of that. Super-complex derivative products are another. Whether traders eventually abandon those things and move on doesn't matter much, IMO. The way markets work now is rigged in various extreme ways, such that only a small group of people with very esoteric technology or human capital can make money at all, and most other people will get shafted as never before. I'm not talking about a Golden Age of capitalism--I'm saying any microscopic cracks or safe havens that might have existed before are now gone. Think of the way that so many workers in the US have had unions, welfare, etc. to at least protect them from starving. Those things will be gone soon if a certain of group of people has its way. And no, I'm definitely not saying things are hopeless, just hopeless under the system we have now, whatever you want to call it. BTW, I've worked with complex derivatives and high-speed trading systems. The people behind them would say (publicly) that they're simply "providing liquidity to the market." They think what they're doing is essentially the same as what happened under the Buttonwood Tree in the late 18th century: http://www.loc.gov/rr/business/hottopic/stock_market.html ...which, of course, is bullshit. Cheers, --Dave. On Sep 26, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Brian Holmes wrote: > Hi Chad - > > First off, not to worry, I recall good interactions with you and I > respect y
Re: The secret financial market only robots can see
Hi Armin-- On Sep 30, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Armin Medosch wrote: > In principle, it is important to differentiate between different forms > of algorithmic trading. There are on one hand, large investment banks > and hedge funds who hold large portfolios of different types of stocks > and equities; they also need fast computers and fast lines, but just > because they need to keep track of lots of different positions and > their relations to each other - together with news and lots of other > things happening in real time; > > those are the companies who employ Quants, people with high level > mathematical and/or theoretical physics knowledge to design the > software and the 'products' traded, but the trading itself is not > really high-frequency, the final decisions are still made by humans > and there are a number of trades a day or even more, but nothing > approaching nano-second stuff. Right, I wouldn't call this algorithmic trading at all. This is general risk management: "How exposed am I to interest-rate movements, shifts in volatility, big drops in a particular industry or the market as a whole?" etc. There are standard measures for these things, usually called the "Greeks": delta, gamma, vega, rho. The trading involved here can be minimal, depending on how often the desk wants to rebalance their portfolio to neutralize these risks. That could be once or a day or once an hour. But the main work and "intelligence" here is in the systems that compute these risk measures, and the people who decide what measures are meaningful to them. The trading doesn't have to be anything fancy. No algorithms needed, usually. > High Frequency Trading is a special case of algo-trading and that > really is a world of its own; according to one insider, the big > investment banks and hedge funds are not really good at it at all, > because it is based on a different mentality - very much a kind of > nerd / hacker type mentality - so that mostly new companies are doing > it who follow this special mindset. the algorithms used are relatively > simple, you don't ned the brain of a quant to write one, but it has > to be very reliable; the strategies applied are aiming at very low > risk as opposed to the risky 'over the counter' deals of hedge funds; > software base is mostly Linux and open source and the entry level > for firms relatively low; my source claimed that HFT was actually a > 'democratization' of speculation, because in a few years everybody > would be able to do it. In my experience, the talk about "open source" in finance is exaggerated. All these systems run on Linux boxes, but that's pretty much where it ends. The algorithmic stuff tends to be proprietary, whether it's any good or not, and written in C++ or Java. There's no end of articles about how Wall St. has "gone open-source," and I don't get it. They might use the gnu C++ compiler, or use cvs for source-control, but that's been going on forever. I don't think I've ever worked on a trading or risk-management system that wasn't proprietary. In fact I know someone who knows someone who used to work with a certain Russian programmer who was arrested and had his life more or less ruined because he was suspected of stealing the secret algorithmic code from the firm he was leaving in order to bring it to the hedge fund he was going to. Or so I've heard. While quants aren't needed to write the trading algorithms, they definitely write a lot of the code that gets baked into these systems--for figuring out what the fair price of some esoteric derivative is, for computing the desk's risk (see above), etc. There's a pretty clear separation of responsibility between the programmers and the quants, though the former know a hell of a lot about the market and the latter know a lot about software. Whatever else you can say about them, most of these quants, at least at the top firms, seriously know their mathematical shit. Many, but not all, of the programmers are equally on top of the technology. This is pretty specialized knowledge, which is why good Wall St. techies are paid as finance people rather than as programmers. Historically, no programmer in any other industry could make anything like what Wall St. tech people made, though I've heard that's changing with some people at Google etc. At the same time, Wall St. firms are getting stingi er. (Yeah, things are bad all over.) > I was also surprised to learn about conditions in this industry. You could > say that this was a kind of Fordism of financialism, where you have very few > analysts but many coders and data base maintainers; they are all employed > with 38 hours jobs, lots of holidays and on the job training and, while > salaries are higher than almost everywhere else, they are very much lower > than totally out of poportion bankers' boni. See above. Certainly almost no Wall St. programmer's salary can touch a trader's salary, but they're still far above what other te
"Arresting the Unjustly Homeless while they Learn to Code"
Good piece on the failed attempt to "rescue" a homeless person by teaching him to code: https://medium.com/weird-future/d19c8db85c2 The whole "[Some disadvantaged group] just needs to learn to code" argument is probably too ridiculous to get into here. But this case highlights another sad fact about many people in the tech community: They seem to have no clue at all about how the everyday world works. Governments, laws, social classes, and all the rest--it's like they've never heard of any of these things. Back in the '90s Cypherpunk days (I was involved with the group, and thought they were generally a great bunch, so I don't mean to criticize them), you'd hear people say in all seriousness that "governments are no match for our mathematics," or words to that effect. This always struck me as dangerously naive. There were nods to "rubber-hose cryptanalysis"--if the bad guys can't crack your algorithm, they'll just get your password by beating it out of you. But it was always a footnote, when in fact it might be the number-one tool that authoritarian governments (for example) will employ for "decryption." This attitude toward tech is megalomaniacal and shows a real ignorance about how things work in the real world. Dictators have had to deal with WAY bigger threats than your app, and they've survived just fine. There's this well-meaning slogan: - "If the people lead, the leaders will follow" To which some people responded: - "If the people lead, the leaders will probably shoot them" I don't mean to be defeatist, but Welcome to Reality. The homeless aren't homeless because they failed to learn Ruby on Rails. Freeing even one person from homelessness by teaching him/her to code would be a great thing, but that's not the way homelessness will be abolished. It might even do more harm than good (except for that one person, obviously) because it'll reinforce the wildly simplistic view that this is how we change the world. --Dave. -- Dave Mandl dma...@panix.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl App.net: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
"The Brutal Ageism of Tech"
Pretty thorough story on ageism in tech, which usually gets no more than a bit of lip service here and there: http://www.newrepublic.com/article/117088/silicons-valleys-brutal-ageism A cynic might say this is the thin edge of the wedge (actually not all that thin, given the visibility and size of the tech industry). --Dave. -- Dave Mandl dma...@panix.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl App.net: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
"Technology is murdering customer service - legally"
Short-ish rant by me, in the Register. Tell everyone you know to click the "Like" button at the bottom of the page: http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2014/04/07/technology_kills_customer_service/ When someone tallies up all the good and bad things that the tech mega-explosion of the last 50 years has brought us, there’s one item I expect to see right at the top of the second column: the slow but steady death of customer service. [...] -- Dave Mandl dma...@panix.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl App.net: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
Re: Elites' Tryranny of Structurelessness
Let's not forget Cathy Devine's anti-authoritarian response to this, "The Tyranny of Tyranny": http://libcom.org/library/tyranny-of-tyranny-cathy-levine - ...There are (at least) two different models for building a movement, only one of which does Joreen acknowledge: a mass organisation with strong, centralised control, such as a Party. The other model, which consolidates mass support only as a coup de grace necessity, is based on small groups in voluntary association. A large group functions as an aggregate of its parts - each member functions as a unit, a cog in the wheel of the large organisation. The individual is alienated by the size, and relegated, to struggling against the obstacle created by the size of the group - as example, expending energy to get a point of view recognised. Small groups, on the other hand, multiply the strength of each member. By working collectively in small numbers, the small group utilises the various contributions of each person to their fullest, nurturing and developing individual input, instead of dissipating it in the competitive survival-of-the-fittest/smartest/wittiest spirit of the large organisation - -- Dave Mandl dma...@panix.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
Re: Elites' Tryranny of Structurelessness
Let's not forget Cathy Devine's anti-authoritarian response to this, "The Tyranny of Tyranny": http://libcom.org/library/tyranny-of-tyranny-cathy-levine - ...There are (at least) two different models for building a movement, only one of which does Joreen acknowledge: a mass organisation with strong, centralised control, such as a Party. The other model, which consolidates mass support only as a coup de grace necessity, is based on small groups in voluntary association. A large group functions as an aggregate of its parts - each member functions as a unit, a cog in the wheel of the large organisation. The individual is alienated by the size, and relegated, to struggling against the obstacle created by the size of the group - as example, expending energy to get a point of view recognised. Small groups, on the other hand, multiply the strength of each member. By working collectively in small numbers, the small group utilises the various contributions of each person to their fullest, nurturing and developing individual input, instead of dissipating it in the competitive survival-of-the-fittest/smartest/wittiest spirit of the large organisation - -- Dave Mandl dma...@panix.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
Re: Evgeny Morozov and the Perils of "Highbrow Journalism"
It seems clear that the New Yorker is no longer home of the best fact-checking/copyediting humankind can achieve. When they started a blog as a separate entity from the magazine I heard writer and editor friends complain about errors all the time. It had very different (i.e., lower) standards than the official magazine. But recently it seems they've been letting things slip at the magazine itself. I gloated to a few friends about finding a fairly blatant music error a couple of years back (the equivalent of disproving the Theory of Relativity, I thought), and they said, "So what? I recently found a couple of mistakes too." I sent the magazine a message about the mistake I found and they either never read it or didn't care, because the article was never corrected.* Things are bad all over, as the old saying goes. --Dave. * The mistake was in naming the band who recorded the song "Teach Your Children," cited in their big Grateful Dead article because Jerry Garcia played on it. I'll leave this as an exercise for the reader. On Oct 17, 2014, at 5:47 PM, John Young wrote: > The New Yorker's dandy Eustace Tilley embodied highbrow journalism. <...> -- Dave Mandl dma...@panix.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
How Pandora's Music Genome Project Misrepresents the Way We Hear Music
(Read it now, before the typos are corrected.) Feature Creeps How Pandora's Music Genome Project Misrepresents the Way We Hear Music by Dave Mandl http://www.brooklynrail.org/2014/11/music/feature-creeps/ "...In the late 1950s, Miles Davis probably spoke for many jazz fans when he said of the avant-garde music of upstart Ornette Coleman, 'If you're talking psychologically, the man is all screwed up inside,' but in 2014 it seems unlikely that many Miles fans would take much notice of the differences that were irreconcilable to him. So a Pandora analyst creating a 'genome' of an Ornette track in 1959, or a big-band record in the 1940s, or a Sex Pistols song in 1976, would certainly come up with a different list of significant features than he or she would today." -- Dave Mandl dma...@panix.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
Fun with algorithms: Uber introduces surge pricing during Sydney hostage siege
http://mashable.com/2014/12/14/uber-sydney-surge-pricing/ An executive in the city's Central Business District (CBD) sent Mashable screenshots of the Uber app that showed the company was charging up to four-times the normal rate because "demand is off the charts." Uber CEO Travis Kalanick: "For each market, the state of emergency price will be set after excluding the 3 highest-priced, non-emergency days of the preceding 2 months," he said, adding that the policy "intends to strike the careful balance between the goal of transportation availability with community expectations of affordability during disasters." -- Dave Mandl dma...@panix.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
The Shut-In Economy
Living the dream: avoiding contact with other people, being able to work every minute of the day. https://medium.com/matter/the-shut-in-economy-ec3ec1294816 - The Shut-In Economy By Lauren Smiley Angel the concierge stands behind a lobby desk at a luxe apartment building in downtown San Francisco, and describes the residents of this imperial, 37-story tower. "Ubers, Squares, a few Twitters," she says. "A lot of work-from-homers." And by late afternoon on a Tuesday, they're striding into the lobby at a just-get-me-home-goddammit clip, some with laptop bags slung over their shoulders, others carrying swank leather satchels. At the same time a second, temporary population streams into the building: the app-based meal delivery people hoisting thermal carrier bags and sacks. Green means Sprig. A huge M means Munchery. Down in the basement, Amazon Prime delivery people check in packages with the porter. The Instacart groceries are plunked straight into a walk-in fridge. This is a familiar scene. Five months ago I moved into a spartan apartment a few blocks away, where dozens of startups and thousands of tech workers live. Outside my building there's always a phalanx of befuddled delivery guys who seem relieved when you walk out, so they can get in. Inside, the place is stuffed with the goodies they bring: Amazon Prime boxes sitting outside doors, evidence of the tangible, quotidian needs that are being serviced by the web. The humans who live there, though, I mostly never see. And even when I do, there seems to be a tacit agreement among residents to not talk to one another. I floated a few "hi's" in the elevator when I first moved in, but in return I got the monosyllabic, no-eye-contact mumble. It was clear: Lady, this is not that kind of building. Back in the elevator in the 37-story tower, the messengers do talk, one tells me. They end up asking each other which apps they work for: Postmates. Seamless. EAT24. GrubHub. Safeway.com. A woman hauling two Whole Foods sacks reads the concierge an apartment number off her smartphone, along with the resident's directions: "Please deliver to my door." "They have a nice kitchen up there," Angel says. The apartments rent for as much as $5,000 a month for a one-bedroom. "But so much, so much food comes in. Between 4 and 8 o'clock, they're on fire." I start to walk toward home. En route, I pass an EAT24 ad on a bus stop shelter, and a little further down the street, a Dungeons & Dragons–type dude opens the locked lobby door of yet another glass-box residential building for a Sprig deliveryman: "You're..." "Jonathan?" "Sweet," Dungeons & Dragons says, grabbing the bag of food. The door clanks behind him. And that's when I realized: the on-demand world isn't about sharing at all. It's about being served. This is an economy of shut-ins. In 1998, Carnegie Mellon researchers warned that the internet could make us into hermits. They released a study monitoring the social behavior of 169 people making their first forays online. The web-surfers started talking less with family and friends, and grew more isolated and depressed. "We were surprised to find that what is a social technology has such anti-social consequences," said one of the researchers at the time. "And these are the same people who, when asked, describe the Internet as a positive thing." We're now deep into the bombastic buildout of the on-demand economy— with investment in the apps, platforms and services surging exponentially. Right now Americans buy nearly eight percent of all their retail goods online, though that seems a wild underestimate in the most congested, wired, time-strapped urban centers. Many services promote themselves as life-expanding--there to free up your time so you can spend it connecting with the people you care about, not standing at the post office with strangers. Rinse's ad shows a couple chilling at a park, their laundry being washed by someone, somewhere beyond the picture's frame. But plenty of the delivery companies are brutally honest that, actually, they never want you to leave home at all. GrubHub's advertising banks on us secretly never wanting to talk to a human again: "Everything great about eating, combined with everything great about not talking to people." DoorDash, another food delivery service, goes for the all-caps, batshit extreme: "NEVER LEAVE HOME AGAIN." Katherine van Ekert isn't a shut-in, exactly, but there are only two things she ever has to run errands for any more: trash bags and saline solution. For those, she must leave her San Francisco apartment and walk two blocks to the drug store, "so woe is my life," she tells me. (She realizes her dry humor about #firstworldproblems may not translate, and clarifies later: "Honestly, this is all tongue in cheek. We're not spoiled brats.") Everything else is done by app. Her husband's office contracts with Washio. Groceries come from Instacart. "I live on Amazon," she says, buying everythin
Amazon Requires Badly-Paid Warehouse Temps to Sign 18-Month Non-Competes
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2015/03/amazon-requires-badly-paid-warehouse-temps-sign-18-month-non-competes.html This borders on sadism. Amazon using a policy that was created for specialized, elite managers to prevent their low-level warehouse workers from getting jobs anywhere else. --- Amazon Requires Badly-Paid Warehouse Temps to Sign 18-Month Non-Competes Posted on March 30, 2015 by Yves Smith The Verge has broken an important story on how far Amazon has gone in its relentless efforts to crush workers. Despite its glitzy Internet image, Amazon's operations depend heavily on manual labor to assemble, pack, and ship orders. Its warehouses are sweatshops, with workers monitored constantly and pressed to meet physically daunting productivity goals. Indeed, many of its warehouses were literally sweatshops, reaching as much as 100 degrees in the summer until bad press embarrassed the giant retailer into installing air conditioners. In Germany, a documentary exposed that Amazon hired neo-Nazi security guards to intimidate foreign, often illegal, hires it had recruited and was housing in crowded company-organized housing. Amazon also fought and won a Supreme Court case to escape compensating its poorly-paid warehouse workers for time they spend in line at the end of shift, waiting for security checks. Amazon's latest "keep workers down" practice is to make temps sign non-competes. Yes, if you are so desperate and foolish as to take a short-term gig with Amazon, you will be barred from working for virtually anyone else for the next eighteen months. Look at how incredibly broad the language is in the non-compete agreement obtained by The Verge (hat tip MF): During employment and for 18 months after the Separation Date, Employee will not, directly or indirectly, whether on Employee's own behalf or on behalf of any other entity (for example, as an employee, agent, partner, or consultant), engage in or support the development, manufacture, marketing, or sale of any product or service that competes or is intended to compete with any product or service sold, offered, or otherwise provided by Amazon (or intended to be sold, offered, or otherwise provided by Amazon in the future) that Employee worked on or supported, or about which Employee obtained or received Confidential Information. Pray tell, what possible employers are not included, given how sweeping these terms are? A cleaning service? Nah, Amazon sells Roombas and vacuum cleaners, so you'd be competing indirectly with them. A receptionist in a dentist's office? Nope, Amazon sells tooth whitening products. A massage therapist? No, Amazon sells electronic massage devices. Working as a gym? No, Amazon sells home exercise equipment. And note that this includes "intended to be old, offered, or otherwise provided by Amazon in the future." Amazon temps are precluded from competing with Amazon vaporware too. Not only is this agreement eye-poppingly broad in terms of product/service range, but Amazon also means for it to be far-reaching from a geographic perspective. From the Verge account: "Employee recognizes that the restrictions in this section 4 may significantly limit Employee's future flexibility in many ways," the agreement asserts, referencing the section containing the noncompete agreement and three other clauses. "Employee further recognizes that the geographic areas for many of Amazon's products and services--and, by extension, the geographic areas applicable to certain restrictions in this Section 4--are extremely broad and in many cases worldwide." Now I have my doubts as to how much success Amazon would have in enforcing this contract in a lot of non-US jurisdictions. But the Seattle retailer goes to great lengths to turn a short-term warehouse gig into a bar to future employment. Consider Verve's description of this provision: The contract--which was obtained through applying and being accepted to a seasonal Amazon warehouse position--even includes a provision that requires employees who sign it to "disclose and provide a true and correct copy of this Agreement to any prospective new employer [???] BEFORE accepting employment[???]" The intent is to create a captive pool of Amazon temps, who will be forced to accept whatever crappy pay and conditions the retailer offers by virtue of being barred from virtually any other job. Verge said it was not able to determine whether Amazon had attempted to enforce these captive labor agreements, but pointed out that the company had been extremely aggressive in pursuing non-compete case against white-collar employees. And some, perhaps many, of the workers who are aware of these clauses do feel the need to obtain consent, which at a minimum creates an obstacle to getting hired by a new firm: Lee wants to continue her seasonal work at Amazon, and because of the noncompete that she's signed, she would be careful if she were to apply for a second job at an Amazon competitor like Sam's Club, the
Re: thedemands.org: list student protest demands (last updated 11.21.15)
Core issues aside (no reasonable person could oppose an anti-racism movement on campuses), I find the trend toward demanding public apologies--a "hand-written apology," no less!--kind of bizarre. There are plenty of reasonable ways to acknowledge and confront racial injustice, but this just seems like some kind of bloodlust and attempt at gratuitous public humiliation. It;s like being forced to write "I will not misbehave in class" ten thousand times, in a public square. I don't know anything about these particular deans and administrators, but how responsible are they personally for systemic racism that has taken shape over two hundred years? (Compare the culpability of someone like Dick Cheney and the Iraq war.) And how will a hand-written apology change that? Why not focus on demands for actual, substantive change and see how that goes before trying to shame these people for lulz? And I don't mean to suggest that it's only students demanding apologies. This seems to have become an accepted tactic in politics as well. But I guess I expect more from students. --Dave. > On Nov 23, 2015, at 12:49 AM, nettime's_occupant wrote: > > < http://www.thedemands.org/ > <...> -- Dave Mandl dma...@panix.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
George Monbiot on the pro-Putin left
Hello Nettime friends, The below comes from the Twitter feed of journalist George Monbiot (@GeorgeMonbiot). It's one of the best, pithiest critiques I've seen of the pro-Putin/pro-Assad "left." Since it was originally a thread of tweets I'm preserving the format of the original by keeping the individual tweets separate. Link to original: https://twitter.com/GeorgeMonbiot/status/1497511988322258948 Enjoy. --Dave. -- For years I've been arguing with a faction within the "anti-imperialist" left, that is neither anti-imperialist nor distinguishable in its foreign policy positions from the far right. It is pro-Putin. It recycles Kremlin propaganda and whitewashes atrocities. Thread/ I've been contesting its justifications of Vladimir Putin’s and Bashar al-Assad’s atrocities in Syria. Its attempts to justify Putin's attacks on Ukraine are equally shameful. In the approach to Putin's invasion, this faction has blamed everyone but him. Its excuses for his imperialism happen to be identical to the Kremlin's: It's all NATO's fault It's about the Azov battalion It's about protecting Russians from Ukrainian aggression. The people who have amplified these excuses are not, as they claim, anti-imperialists. They are rightly opposed to western imperialism, but will bend over backwards to accommodate Russian imperialism. Some are paid stooges. For others it’s "my enemy's enemy is my friend." In Syria, echoing Russian propaganda, they have excused or denied some of the worst contemporary atrocities on Earth: Assad's chemical weapons attacks, barrel bombing of civilians, mass imprisonment, torture and murder of those who resist. Just as they characterised all Ukrainians who defied Russian imperialism as Nazis, they've characterised all Syrians who defy Assad as "head choppers". They have sought to delegitimise all resistance to Putin and Assad. In trying to counter this propaganda, I’ve found myself accused, bizarrely, of being a “warmonger”, an “imperialist” and a “US shill”. No, it’s about trying to apply consistent principles. About opposing the worse examples of inhumanity, regardless of the perpetrator. (For the record, I was among the very few UK journalists to oppose the invasion of Afghanistan. I also set up the Arrest Blair campaign, to try to hold him to account for his criminal war in Iraq. Never mind, I must be a western shill and warmonger.) Of course, I was not alone in calling out this appeasement. But we were few in number, while the pro-Putin faction has been noisy, highly visible and brimming with confidence and aggression. None of this has been any fun. But the propaganda had to be contested. Now that Putin’s full-scale invasion has left them stranded, some of these people are mumbling “of course, we condemn all war.” But they haven’t and they don’t. For years they have carried water for Putin and other bloodthirsty tyrants, justifying their colonial aggressions. True anti-imperialism is not about opposing only the west’s imperialism, essential as this is. It’s about opposing all imperialism, whether western, Russian, Chinese or other. It’s about opposing all aggressive wars, regardless of who’s waging them. I’m sorry to bring all this up again. It’s uncomfortable, in fact frankly pretty horrible to engage with. But we do no one – except Putin and his acolytes – any favours by pretending it isn’t happening. -- -- Dave Mandl david.ma...@gmail.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
Re: What is Eurasianism?
That's my cue to mention this book: https://www.amazon.com/Dreamer-Day-Francis-Postwar-International/dp/1570270392/ It was written by Kevin Coogan, who sadly died a couple of years ago. Kevin was incredibly knowledgeable about the far right, and in particular the European New Right. The book is nominally a biography of the American fascist Francis Parker Yockey, but it covers the roots of the red-brown movement in great detail, including Dugin and all the rest. I'd consider it required reading on the subject. The book was published by your friends at Autonomedia (designed and copyedited by yrs truly.) Cheers, --Dave. > On Mar 12, 2022, at 11:36 AM, dr sm wrote: > > Thanks for posting Brian. > > Dugin outlines Eurasianismin in quite a few places; see his Fourth Political > Theory. Can't say I grok all of it (there's a learning curve), but this > perspective is linked to what Dugin terms a special kind of "Russian truth" > and his ideas on culture. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZxLxN77lF0 > > Sincerely, Susan > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2022 at 12:17 AM Brian Holmes > wrote: > What is Eurasianism? > > And why should you care about it? > > The short answer is that Eurasianism is the set of strategic questions and > partial answers that have arisen since the center of global economic gravity > shifted away from the Atlantic Ocean, but not toward the American-dominated > Pacific. Today, economic growth is centered somewhere in the middle of the > earth's greatest landmass, what Mackinder called the "World Island," Eurasia. > China occupies the eastern coast of this landmass; Europe, the western one. > The middle is where the questions of Eurasianism lie. > -- Dave Mandl david.ma...@gmail.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
On Chomsky on Syria
Excellent deep dive into Chomsky's shallow take on Syria, including the facile "enemy of my enemy" approach he seems to take on pretty much every issue. Especially relevant given the recent rise of the pro-Assad left: https://newlinesmag.com/review/chomsky-is-no-friend-of-the-syrian-revolution/ --Dave. -- Dave Mandl david.ma...@gmail.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
Interview with Perry Metzger on WFMU
Hi-- Here's an interview I did with Perry Metzger as guest host of WFMU's Techtonic program. Perry talked about cryptocurrencies (especially Bitcoin), the blockchain, and more. "Bitcoin is the least-private transaction system that has ever been invented by human beings." Perry is a computer-security expert, cryptographer, and ex-cypherpunk. He also runs the Cryptography mailing list, where "Satoshi Nakamoto" first published his paper describing Bitcoin. Also included: a few minutes of music by the French group Klimperei. https://www.wfmu.org/playlists/shows/115775 --Dave. -- Dave Mandl david.ma...@gmail.com da...@wfmu.org Web: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/ Twitter: @dmandl Instagram: dmandl # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject:
Re: Stormy weather? Daniele Ganser edit
D’Eramo, quoted by Michael Guggenheim :I find these now-common disclaimers fascinating:And Russia’s unjustifiable invasion of Ukraine doesn’t absolve NATO of its responsibility in producing the conflict.This shows that what Putin has been doing is so terrible that even his defenders* feel obligated to at least acknowledge as much. The reason seems to be that if/when they're accused of being apologists for genocide they can always go back to this tepid parenthetical remark as proof that they disapproved of the worst of it, and said so. But this is usually one sentence fragment drowned out by thousands of words in which they blame NATO (or Biden, or US defense contractors, or whoever) for the whole thing. It's not unlike corporate CEOs who feel obligated to say that they "accept full responsibility" for mass layoffs--a meaningless platitude.If the invasion is "unjustifiable" it seems like they could devote a paragraph or two to that, rather than to some Rube Goldberg-ish tale of how someone else forced Putin to bomb hospitals and slaughter civilians(* Not all his defenders. You can identify the most hardcore of them by their refusal to even acknowledge that the Russians are doing anything wrong in Ukraine.) --Dave.--Dave Mandldavid.ma...@gmail.comda...@wfmu.orgWeb: http://dmandl.tumblr.com/Twitter: @dmandlInstagram: dmandl# distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org # @nettime_bot tweets mail w/ sender unless #ANON is in Subject: