Re: Fwd: the European manifesto of Varoufakis and Piketty
Dear Patrice, chers tous, Thank you for your report. But what a sadness... Just to remind that everywhere when the radical left line was missing in the realization of the left wing at power, when the elected power was only acted by social-democracy, instead of winning in a moderate solution, it lost the way. When the social-democracy--the radical execution missing--lost its concrete program (concrete projects always linked with their symbolic social signification of exchange), thus they quit the State power leaving it waste away, but to be replaced by any sort of fascisms, always in the History. This comes from the disillusionment, this comes from disorganisation. This comes from disappearance of the alternative democratic solution (can be ideological as can be practical). Such is the paradox of Democracy that Tspiras having been a social-democrat till the end has made loosing the policy. But if not, he would have been a dictator. May be that the anarchist time is coming. You can not restore democracy when she disappeared, you can just overthrow the power that occupies it either by violence or by cunning, then create a new democracy with new rules. About Varoufakis. I think that the plan of virtual money conceived by Varoufakis (and Galbraith among others) which failed due to the impeachment to realise it, was very appropriate to the situation to hold the time facing the negotiation. If Varoufakis would not be this seductive personality to the media calling and this player even this sort of epic poet, and if he had not this sort of visual and comportmental gimmick that does not appear serious--even fetishist of technique--he would not the able person to imagine and conceive this sort of challenge--this plan surfing in between socio-materialist objective and virtual reality. That appears exactly a hacking from the scriptural money process, not the target to own the world but just a local precarious solution for waiting. A scriptural mode in other way. But a warm heart and a happy energy for the common despite the despair situation. But he was never at executive power because Tspiras has not given him the means of this innovative dialectical practice. Why exactly ? I do not care. But he missed the contribution of imagination to really try to help the Greek people. The risk was minor facing the threat. When Tspiras has accepted from the EU their rule to exclude Varoufakis from the negotiation, thus Tspiras has killed Varoufakis as executive member of his government, but he killed his proper authority and already by this symbolic sacrifice he has killed the hope of a winning deal. He lost. I know that Tspiras had not succeed to get the absolute majority, I know that he was obliged to accept some inconvenient persons to his policy into his government. Anyway he did not assume the symbolic. Having betrayed Varoufakis at the view of the EU executives and Troïka: this situation has predicted that he was at the point to betray the people (the referendum result which faked the show was a event/not event). And that he was already defeated and that obviously he would make in sort that the Greeks will lost through the fact that being a looser himself. Toward the issue When EU executives and Troïka refused to talk with Varoufakis, the duty of Tspiras was to put his resignation in the balance. That could be the good moment to conceive his resignation if he would have to be supported from a powerful reaction by the European left. Instead of that he trained all the European left to fail by solidarity. Look what happened to Iglesias and Podemos just after... Enough people ceased to trust them. The one having make loosing the common is not Varoufakis (as he was called to resign -- not because he wore special shirts or riding a titanesk moto) but Tspiras. Of course that is not the style nor the moto of Varoufakis which created a problem without solution inside the xenophobic EU but American consulting from dollarzone contributing to eurozone through Varoufakis work-- the trojan horse they thought). Not the dollar from Wall street but the dollar from the flexible rule of the Federal Bank of America (which stays linked to the Department of State) -- Stiglitz having directed this institution from which their chauvinist nightmare consists. Why Tspiras asked Varoufakis as economy minister? he absolutely knew his gimmick and his style. But he wanted to be conforted by the Nobelized American progressive liberal economists to support him thanks to the Vatroufakis relationships. From Tspiras a calling sign, not a real thought. Varoufakis has the thought of his practices -- organic practice from the virtuality into the social reality (not a growing reality from virtual reality, but the reversibility of the virtual reality outside the growing reality). From here there are a lot of hacking possibilities. That is strategy (exactly what macro-economy is). Tspiras emerges under a soft personage, but a pity for
Re: Fwd: the European manifesto of Varoufakis and Piketty
oh I forgot that Varoufakis has spoken about "bitcoin" (with a smile as eye blink) to evoke the virtual money in the plan B owhich members of Tspiras government have prevented him from achieving ;-) On 12 September 2015 at 20:33, Louise Desrenards <louise.desrena...@free.fr> wrote: Hi Geert, Hi! Alex, On http://www.jean-luc-melenchon.fr/2015/09/11/a-plan-b-in-europe/ <...> # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
Re: Corbyn as a medium is the message
Of course I think Richard tells the true situation. And often I agree with Alex but this time I disagree with him. Of Precarity: precarious is no more a relevant concept substituted to the low social classes in the new critical political economy because now it is a global materialist reality under different statements (can be due to the capitalist neoliberal rules, can be the new wars, etc.). The time of empiric practice as a laboratory equal a fund of experience from which to learn and rethinking from it is come. If you persist in the meta-postmodern theory you miss the democracy while fascism -- included financial capital as facism -- will definitly emerge as radical dominant power of the west (without any rule of equivalence of the value with the people) on this earth that we know mortal -- not only the people. If you fear reactive nationalism you are true but it is a view far from to be enough wide. But not sure that Corbyn will be the winner on saturday even if as European I warmly hope that he will. http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/sep/10/jeremy-corbyn-all-ey es-as-labour-leadership-voting-ends as European  I hope that he will. Why?  (sorry for my leaden english. speaking) 1. Because the UK is not eurozone. 2. Because the time of virtual theory applied to the society of meta-democracy is prescribed. Even outside the TV The revolution will not happen but a killing revolution -- this one that the financial and military power are doing. Now it is the time to come to the practice included the practice of power in a democracy and/or in a meta-democracy. Probably UK is the last one or the more exemplary among the surviving democracies. Because the UK is not eurozone. Corbyn as event is a first step for european citizen. After the failure of Greece it is important to understand if out from the eurozone (even before the claim of whether it is wise to establish a State out of it) if such a program like Corbyn presents is able to be elected to power. It is not a revolutionary program but socially acceptable by the active left; the UK is currently the alone power among the States that may affect the authority in the Schengen area without being linked to the eurozone. So it is the only program that could stem the austerity by partly turning back and partly by novating out of it for restoring some acceptable welfare for all and a certain solidarity... The program emerges from a traditional power but paradoxally is the european alone after the most advanced democratic performance (plus financial recovery and economic recovery) of Islandic. Can you or not, outside the eurozone, but in a democratic--can be meta-democratic-- country of financial capitalism, make for restoring a sharing state for the people (as well citizens and as immigrated people) up without a coup by the banks through their reaction under a brutal form against the population or other indirect recourse from the legal system? Then the eurozone countries can think about the avaibility of their own first step -- leaving the eurozone but staying European (with the understanding that eurozone will not change due to the Lisboa treaty). It is vital that sovereignist must not be confused with nationalist. From this it depends the possible future of a democratic federal Europe having different regime of euro parity as supra-value, or UE centralized but fascist. Because the current UE rule is firstly to catch money to contribute to the financial euro stability and ensure the banks. Hurry up the UK! We are waiting for you. On 9 September 2015 at 23:18, Richard Barbrookwrote: Hiya, > great to hear from an insider and know there's life for labour after > blair and the millibands. The Labour Left has been stubbornly defending its arsenal waiting until the correct moment came for its counter-attack to be launched! <...> # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
Re: Corbyn as a medium is the message
Ari, of course you are completely true. I think the same. But European fascism of rule is growing and it is exactly the point for discussing why a Corbyn is not the way of loose but a sort of constructivist experience hacked from the disappearance of the code of the value.. Plus at a certain point we do not discern only reformism and the revolutionary but we discern also between the revolutionary and the corporatist or (from now) tech-corporatist - could it be emergent. Anyway Corbyn is not a corporatist what constitutes a sort of lesson from an old man to the productive generations from secret to power. my respect L. On 10 September 2015 at 18:36, ari <[1]a...@kein.org> wrote:  Alex, I'm afraid you are right on all counts. Corbyn's left is  conservative.  The pioneers don't seem to be looking to institutional politics: the  return on investment is nil, unless you really need a hug.  Social informal economies and alternative designs, on the other hand,  seem to be thriving and multiplying. <...> # distributed via : no commercial use without permission #is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org
Re: nettime EU proposes worlds largest ever cultural funding programme
As French I approve Dante-Gabryell Monson. The enrichment of a virtual State at the expense of the lives of people in increasing suffering in their countries is a scandal (EU does not exist as a State elected by the European public order but as supra-organization of oligarchy of the governments) On 11 January 2012 14:15, Dante-Gabryell Monson dante.mon...@gmail.comwrote: imho / hypothesis, looks like a defacto transfer of competencies, moving from national to supra-national institutional funding for culture, as national cultural budgets have been cut in a number of european countries... ? ... -- - # distributed via nettime: no commercial use without permission # nettime is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nett...@kein.org