Re: NetworkManager 0.7.0-rc1 released

2008-11-05 Thread Derek Atkins
Dan,

Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hi,

 I tagged and uploaded NM 0.7.0-rc1 on Sunday night.  Yes, there are
 still bugs, and yes, we'll fix the bad ones, and yes, some people's pet
 bugs will only get fixed after the final release.  I'll do an rc2 this
 coming weekend, and we'll wrap up the 0.7 development cycle by November
 15th.  This time for real :)

 http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/NetworkManager/0.7/
 http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/network-manager-applet/0.7/

Congrats!  Nice job.  It's been a long time coming and I know you've
put a lot of effort into this.

I've got two questions:

1) Is this going to get pushed into F9?

2) I'm still using 0.6.6 (yes, I'm still on F7) and I periodically
   connect my cell phone via USB and have a SprintPCS network
   configuration in the dialup configuration menu.  Will this
   version still support me?

 Dan

-derek

-- 
   Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
   Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
   URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]PGP key available
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: NetworkManager 0.7.0-rc1 released

2008-11-05 Thread Alexander Sack
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 03:31:57PM +, Tim Hawkins wrote:
 Likewise is there any chance of getting a PPA build for intrepid, as i  

This will happen of course.

 would love fixes for 3G modems and
 ip4config.

Are you the latest PPA? which fixes in particular are you missing
there? I still have some in the queue that are not yet in the PPA, but
would love to hear if i failed to spot something up front.

 - Alexander

___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: NetworkManager 0.7.0-rc1 released

2008-11-05 Thread Tim Hawkins
I added the network-manager ppa to my sources and ran update, I only  
got 4 files, network-manager and 3 other libs, is that expected on an  
intrepid install?


If so I will do some testing with my 169G tonight and let you know.

On 5 Nov 2008, at 15:37, Alexander Sack wrote:


On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 03:31:57PM +, Tim Hawkins wrote:
Likewise is there any chance of getting a PPA build for intrepid,  
as i


This will happen of course.


would love fixes for 3G modems and
ip4config.


Are you the latest PPA? which fixes in particular are you missing
there? I still have some in the queue that are not yet in the PPA, but
would love to hear if i failed to spot something up front.

- Alexander

___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: NetworkManager 0.7.0-rc1 released

2008-11-05 Thread Alexander Sack
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 04:21:23PM +, Tim Hawkins wrote:
 I added the network-manager ppa to my sources and ran update, I only got 
 4 files, network-manager and 3 other libs, is that expected on an  
 intrepid install?

Yes, thats expected. I didn't upload a new applet there yet, i think.

 - Alexander

___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: NetworkManager 0.7.0-rc1 released

2008-11-05 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 15:31 +, Tim Hawkins wrote:
 Likewise is there any chance of getting a PPA build for intrepid, as i  
 would love fixes for 3G modems and
 ip4config.
 
 Also does anybody know what the status of the ppp bug with ms- 
 domainserver response from wireless modems, resulting in dud
 DNS entries is? Discussion seems to have gone dark on this.

Try ppp 2.4.5 which was recently released, there are some fixes in this
area that may help this problem out.  I can't 100% confirm that 2.4.5
fixes it, but I used to periodically get the bogus DNS servers with
T-Mobile and I haven't had the issue since I backported a few patches:

http://git.ozlabs.org/?p=ppp.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=2e09ef6886bbf00bc5a9a641110f801e372ffde6
http://git.ozlabs.org/?p=ppp.git;a=commitdiff_plain;h=f8191bf07df374f119a07910a79217c7618f113e

are the two I'm using.

Dan

 On 5 Nov 2008, at 15:19, Derek Atkins wrote:
 
  Dan,
 
  Dan Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Hi,
 
  I tagged and uploaded NM 0.7.0-rc1 on Sunday night.  Yes, there are
  still bugs, and yes, we'll fix the bad ones, and yes, some people's  
  pet
  bugs will only get fixed after the final release.  I'll do an rc2  
  this
  coming weekend, and we'll wrap up the 0.7 development cycle by  
  November
  15th.  This time for real :)
 
  http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/NetworkManager/0.7/
  http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/network-manager-applet/0.7/
 
  Congrats!  Nice job.  It's been a long time coming and I know you've
  put a lot of effort into this.
 
  I've got two questions:
 
  1) Is this going to get pushed into F9?
 
  2) I'm still using 0.6.6 (yes, I'm still on F7) and I periodically
connect my cell phone via USB and have a SprintPCS network
configuration in the dialup configuration menu.  Will this
version still support me?
 
  Dan
 
  -derek
 
  -- 
Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH
[EMAIL PROTECTED]PGP key available
  ___
  NetworkManager-list mailing list
  NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
  http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
 

___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


RE: location of DHCP lease files

2008-11-05 Thread Dan Williams
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 13:52 -0500, Miner, Jonathan W (US SSA) wrote:
 I understand the need for multiple lease files, based on network.
 
 My concern was the two different directories being used.  I was trying to 
 solve a network problem, and couldn't understand why my lease files were 
 several months old... Then I discovered that NM was putting lease files 
 somewhere else.
 
 Persistence across boots would require some cooperation with the DHCP server, 
 which, in my case, may give me a new IP each time I boot. (It's some 3rd 
 party, Windows based DHCP/DNS solution, which I don't manage)

Moved back to /var/lib/dhclient/ in r4267.

Dan

 - Jon
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Dan Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tue 11/4/2008 1:41 PM
 To:   Miner, Jonathan W (US SSA)
 Cc:   networkmanager-list@gnome.org
 Subject:  Re: location of DHCP lease files
 
 On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 11:47 -0500, Miner, Jonathan W (US SSA) wrote:
  Hi -
  
  I've noticed that the native Fedora ifup-eth script puts its lease files 
  into
  
  /var/lib/dhclient/dhclient-${DEVICE}.leases
  
  but, NetworkManager puts the lease files into
  
  /var/run/dhclient-${DEVICE}.lease
 
 Correct.  NM uses different lease files because in the near future,
 we'll want to use separate lease files for _each connection_.  Since
 many machines move around, it's pretty pointless to use the same lease
 file for your home AP as for your work AP.
 
 What happens right now is that you'll get a lease from work, dhclient
 will cache it, and then when you come home it'll try to renew that work
 lease at home, leading to DHCP lag.  That's bad.
 
 So even if the lease files _did_ stay in the same place as dhclient puts
 them, you'd have a lot more lease files anyway.  But, once we modify NM
 to handle leasefile-per-connection, we should probably move them back
 to /var/lib/dhclient just to they are persistent.
 
 I assume you're worried about persistence of the lease across boots?
 
 Dan
  
 
 
 
 

___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Strange VPN problems

2008-11-05 Thread Rick Jones
I've never been able to get NM to make a successful VPN connection, and I 
finally have some meaningful (I hope) logs etc.


I can get a working connection using pppd with pptp on the command line, 
but not using NM. It seems that the NM plugin sets up the connection 
slightly differently. This command line works (executed as root):


/usr/sbin/pppd pty '/usr/sbin/pptp server.my.domain --nolaunchpppd' 
nodetach lock usepeerdns noipdefault refuse-pap refuse-chap refuse-mschap 
require-mppe nobsdcomp nodeflate name rick


(auth is handled by chap-secrets in normal way)

The server is another Linux box, so the connection is served by pppd + pptp 
on the remote end as well. In particular the server log shows the server 
responding to client PPTP echo requests at 1 minute intervals:


pptpd[2289]: CTRL: Received PPTP Control Message (type: 5)
pptpd[2289]: CTRL: Made a ECHO RPLY packet
pptpd[2289]: CTRL: I wrote 20 bytes to the client.
pptpd[2289]: CTRL: Sent packet to client
... etc

When I create the connection with NM, no PPTP echo messages are received, 
instead the server attempts to send the echoes, but gets no response. This 
kind of thing appears after about 2 minutes:


pptpd[31784]: CTRL: Sending ECHO REQ id 1
pptpd[31784]: CTRL: Made a ECHO REQ packet
pptpd[31784]: CTRL: I wrote 16 bytes to the client.
pptpd[31784]: CTRL: Sent packet to client
pptpd[31784]: CTRL: EOF or bad error reading ctrl packet length.
pptpd[31784]: CTRL: couldn't read packet header (exit)
pptpd[31784]: CTRL: CTRL read failed
pptpd[31784]: CTRL: Client 89.193.143.54 control connection finished
pptpd[31784]: CTRL: Exiting now

- connection gone.

(Note this is not LCP echo - that's disabled already)

NM appears to be setting up the connection differently, in a way that 
doesn't work - what's the difference?


Is there anything I can do server-side to make it more friendly?

I'm running the current PPA build of NM on Ubuntu Hardy 8.0.4. Has anything 
changed in this area in rc1?


--
Rick ___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: VPN Only for this address range equivalent

2008-11-05 Thread the_leech



Dan Williams wrote:
 
 This is fair criticism; we do need better explanations and help text.
 You enter the same information there that you entered in the Only for
 these addresses box.  The Address range and prefix are required (just
 like they were before) but you can leave the Gateway and Metric boxes
 blank if you like.
 

Thank you very much. I have put the following values:
Address = 172.17.0.0
Prefix = 16
Gateway = 0.0.0.0
and now it works exactly as it should :)

Thanks again
Piotr

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/VPN-%22Only-for-this-address-range%22-equivalent-tp20236932p20343837.html
Sent from the Gnome - NetworkManager mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: NetworkManager 0.7.0-rc1 released

2008-11-05 Thread Matthew Saltzman

On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 12:00 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
 On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 10:19 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
  
  I've got two questions:
  
  1) Is this going to get pushed into F9?
 
 Yes.

F8?

Thanks.

 
 
-- 
Matthew Saltzman

Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs
___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: NetworkManager 0.7.0-rc1 released

2008-11-05 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 18:12 +, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
 On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 12:00 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
  On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 10:19 -0500, Derek Atkins wrote:
   
   I've got two questions:
   
   1) Is this going to get pushed into F9?
  
  Yes.
 
 F8?

Yes, though it'll require a bit more time to re-implement some missing
pieces of PolicyKit that F8 doesn't have.

Dan


___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


RE: blank lines added to /etc/hosts [PATCH]

2008-11-05 Thread Dan Williams
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 17:04 -0500, Miner, Jonathan W (US SSA) wrote:
 I think this will fix my issue... only append the newline if we're not 
 parsing the last line of the file.
 
 --- src/NetworkManagerPolicy.c.orig   2008-11-03 09:33:08.0 -0500
 +++ src/NetworkManagerPolicy.c2008-11-04 17:02:39.0 -0500
 @@ -306,7 +306,8 @@
  
   if (add_line) {
   g_string_append (new_contents, *line);
 - g_string_append_c (new_contents, '\n');
 +if (*(line+1)) /* if not the last line */
 + g_string_append_c (new_contents, '\n');
   }
   }

Committed, thanks!

dan


___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: Strange VPN problems

2008-11-05 Thread Dan Williams
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 17:31 +, Rick Jones wrote:
 I've never been able to get NM to make a successful VPN connection,
 and I finally have some meaningful (I hope) logs etc.
 
 I can get a working connection using pppd with pptp on the command
 line, but not using NM. It seems that the NM plugin sets up the
 connection slightly differently. This command line works (executed as
 root):
 
 /usr/sbin/pppd pty '/usr/sbin/pptp server.my.domain --nolaunchpppd'
 nodetach lock usepeerdns noipdefault refuse-pap refuse-chap
 refuse-mschap require-mppe nobsdcomp nodeflate name rick
 
 (auth is handled by chap-secrets in normal way)
 
 The server is another Linux box, so the connection is served by pppd +
 pptp on the remote end as well. In particular the server log shows the
 server responding to client PPTP echo requests at 1 minute intervals:
 
 pptpd[2289]: CTRL: Received PPTP Control Message (type: 5)
 pptpd[2289]: CTRL: Made a ECHO RPLY packet
 pptpd[2289]: CTRL: I wrote 20 bytes to the client.
 pptpd[2289]: CTRL: Sent packet to client
 ... etc
 
 When I create the connection with NM, no PPTP echo messages are
 received, instead the server attempts to send the echoes, but gets no
 response. This kind of thing appears after about 2 minutes:
 
 pptpd[31784]: CTRL: Sending ECHO REQ id 1
 pptpd[31784]: CTRL: Made a ECHO REQ packet
 pptpd[31784]: CTRL: I wrote 16 bytes to the client.
 pptpd[31784]: CTRL: Sent packet to client
 pptpd[31784]: CTRL: EOF or bad error reading ctrl packet length.
 pptpd[31784]: CTRL: couldn't read packet header (exit)
 pptpd[31784]: CTRL: CTRL read failed
 pptpd[31784]: CTRL: Client 89.193.143.54 control connection finished
 pptpd[31784]: CTRL: Exiting now

What does the routing table look like immediately after you connect, and
then right before the 2-minute disconnection?  'route -n' format please.

Thanks!
Dan


___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


WAN Ericsson F3507g

2008-11-05 Thread James Ward
Hi,

I just recently upgraded to the Lenovo W500 laptop which has a built-in
Ericsson F2507g WAN card.  Unfortunately I can't get this new card to
work with NM because it needs to be turned on first.  There is a thread
about how to do this manually on Ubuntu:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=934013

My sim card doesn't require a password like the newer ones so this
should be pretty simple.  But I can't seem to make it work.  I'm using
the Ubuntu NM PPA.  Any ideas?

Thanks.

-James

___
NetworkManager-list mailing list
NetworkManager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list