Re: How to Test NetworkManager 0.9
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 19:54 -0500, David Narvaez wrote: On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:09 PM, Lamarque Vieira Souza lamar...@gmail.com wrote: What wpa_supplicant and NetworkManager versions do you use? I use wpa_supplicant -0.7.3 and NetworkManager 0.8.9997. Same thing here, wpa_supplicant-0.7.3-r2 from Gentoo and NM 0.8.9997 from git. wpa_supplicant needs to be be built with the *new* D-Bus interface enabled, and the service activation file that D-Bus uses to launch it on demand needs to include the -u option so that the dbus interface is started at runtime. Dan ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: How to Test NetworkManager 0.9
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote: wpa_supplicant needs to be be built with the *new* D-Bus interface enabled, and the service activation file that D-Bus uses to launch it on demand needs to include the -u option so that the dbus interface is started at runtime. Thanks for the follow up on this issue, I was just about to write about my findings last weekend: Indeed, I was debugging the execution of nm-tool, the D-Bus calls from NM and those from wpa_supplicant and as far as I can tell, they are not talking to each other the right way, so I guessed I had to find a patch that fixes the communication between them two (what you mention is the new D-Bus interface). I also stumbled upon a similar reply on this list[0] but I wasn't able to determine if that patch is currently included in Gentoo's revision of wpa_supplicant as I had some other stuff to finish yesterday. I'll find that out today about that patch and fix the D-Bus issue which should get me up and running with NM 0.9. Thanks again. [0] http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2011-February/msg00027.html ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: [PATCH] ModemManager: Enhancements to Icera error reporting and access technology reporting
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 12:15 -0400, Eric Shienbrood wrote: According to the documentation I have, the connection state field is '-' when not connected. To quote more specifically: 4) Response to AT%NWSTATE CR (execute command) %NWSTATE: signal strength,MCC/MNC,access technology,connection state,regulation . . . connection state possible values: - for 2G access technologies and 3G access technology when not connected R99 for 3G access technology when connected HSDPA for 3G access technology when connected and HSDPA resource allocated by the network HSUPA for 3G access technology when connected and HSUPA resource allocated by the network HSDPA-HSUPA for 3G access technology when connected and both HSDPA and HSUPA resources allocated by the network I interpret that to mean that if the field is not '-', it indicates the technology that's actually in use for the connection, so that's what should be reported for access technology. If the field is '-', then there's no connection, so we should report what's in the access technology field instead. Also, sorry about missing the g_free() for the result of g_match_info_fetch(). Do you want me to send a new patch, or do you want to take care of it? Done pushed, thanks! Dan Eric On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:47 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 10:35 -0400, Eric Shienbrood wrote: Thanks Aleksander! New patch file is attached. I split these up and pushed all hunks except the hunk for processing the match info for the NWSTATE response. Two things there... first you need to make sure you free the result of g_match_info_fetch() since that's an allocated string. Second, what does '-' mean again for the connected field? I had the docs at some point but I appear to have lost them; what other values can be there, and why don't we want to update the access technology when that field is something other than '-'? Thanks! Dan Eric On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:56 AM, Aleksander Morgado aleksan...@lanedo.com wrote: Hi Eric, The additional error detail allows us to know that a connection failed because of an invalid APN. Also, when handling access technology changes, report the technology in use if we're connected. Finally, avoid using CFUN=0 when disabling the modem. A small thing to fix in the patch. All callbacks receiving a response from the AT serial port should check if the modem has already been removed, so in query_network_error_code_done(), this check is needed just before trying to parse any reply: /* If the modem has already been removed, return without * scheduling callback */ if (mm_callback_info_check_modem_removed (info)) return; See http://cgit.freedesktop.org/ModemManager/ModemManager/commit/?id=9323daec015ecad65c39b6020b62e864c027d858 Cheers! -- Aleksander ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: [PATCH] Simple patches for NM
On Thu, 2011-06-09 at 17:42 +0200, Aleksander Morgado wrote: Hey, Attached the patches for: * the automake portability warnings (0001, 2 versions, one for master and the other for NM_0_8) * the missing U2600 band ID (applicable to both master and NM_0_8) Applied, thanks! Dan ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: No connection with Ericsson Business Mobile Networks BV F3307 Mobile Broadband Module
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 16:57 +0200, Klaus Lichtenwalder wrote: Hi, just got me a new netbook with built in gsm module. Unfortunately, it looks like I can't make a connection with NetworkManager on a fresh Fedora 15 LXDE Spin. Attached you will find a long lsub output and the output of modem-manager --debug. It appears that for the Ericsson devices, CME ERROR 272 (from the MM log) means that the hardware 3G radio switch is preventing the 3G card from powering up fully. Dan ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: No connection with Ericsson Business Mobile Networks BV F3307 Mobile Broadband Module
Am 13.06.2011 17:43, schrieb Dan Williams: It appears that for the Ericsson devices, CME ERROR 272 (from the MM log) means that the hardware 3G radio switch is preventing the 3G card from powering up fully. Dan, thanks, this seems to be the case here. I've been playing with some keyboard combinations, and it seems that I can't have wireless and 3g at the same time (well, there might be some use cases, but I guess this is not very important), but I can activate 3g. Unfortunately, there's no indication which connection can be active, except for wireless dropping off the net. lsusb and lspci don't show differences in the interfaces. Thanks, Klaus -- Klaus Lichtenwalder, Dipl. Inform., http://www.lichtenwalder.name PGP Key fingerprint: BF52 72FA 1F5A 1E29 C0F8 498C C4C6 633C 2821 97DA signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ networkmanager-list mailing list networkmanager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
