Re: Note regarding PEAP on NM 0.7
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 13:40 -0400, Darren Albers wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:48 -0400, Darren Albers wrote: >> >> If your wireless network uses PEAP and authenticates via Active >> >> Directory the old domain\username format no longer works (At least it >> >> doesn't with my network or my test networks). Instead use >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] So if your domain is test.com you use >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> Dan, if it matters I have tested this with Aruba AP's talking to Cisco >> >> ACS servers so it might be something particular to my setup but with >> >> 0.6.5 and 0.6.6 it worked using domain\username. >> > >> > I can't think of anything in NM that would have changed. Things that >> > would affect this would be the supplicant or the ACS server... Any idea >> > if those versions have changed? >> > >> > Dan >> > >> > >> >> Nope, in fact if I run 0.6.6 it works fine (I rolled back when >> troubleshooting it), but when I run 0.7 it fails using >> domain\username. I don't know if it is a big deal since [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> should work fine for anyone running Windows 2000 or later... It just >> might be confusing since most supplicants tell you to use >> domain\username > > Can you see what it looks like in GConf when you use domain\username? I > wonder if it's an escaping issue. Also, when you use domain\username, > does NM send the option through to the supplicant like that or is it > mangled in some way? /var/log/messages should show during the > connection attempt. > > Dan > > > The entries look correct in GConf and it seems to be entered as domain\username properly. To add to the craziness, I rebooted and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] stopped working. I switched to domain\user and it started working. I am going to enable some logging. It is weird that 0.6.6 works fine everytime but 0.7 doesn't however I am leaning towards something odd with my setup and not with NetworkManager. The Aruba AP's have some aggressive Wireless IDS options and I wonder if I triggered it somehow. Consider this noise for now, sorry about that ;-) ___ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: Note regarding PEAP on NM 0.7
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 13:40 -0400, Darren Albers wrote: > On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:48 -0400, Darren Albers wrote: > >> If your wireless network uses PEAP and authenticates via Active > >> Directory the old domain\username format no longer works (At least it > >> doesn't with my network or my test networks). Instead use > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] So if your domain is test.com you use > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> Dan, if it matters I have tested this with Aruba AP's talking to Cisco > >> ACS servers so it might be something particular to my setup but with > >> 0.6.5 and 0.6.6 it worked using domain\username. > > > > I can't think of anything in NM that would have changed. Things that > > would affect this would be the supplicant or the ACS server... Any idea > > if those versions have changed? > > > > Dan > > > > > > Nope, in fact if I run 0.6.6 it works fine (I rolled back when > troubleshooting it), but when I run 0.7 it fails using > domain\username. I don't know if it is a big deal since [EMAIL PROTECTED] > should work fine for anyone running Windows 2000 or later... It just > might be confusing since most supplicants tell you to use > domain\username Can you see what it looks like in GConf when you use domain\username? I wonder if it's an escaping issue. Also, when you use domain\username, does NM send the option through to the supplicant like that or is it mangled in some way? /var/log/messages should show during the connection attempt. Dan ___ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: Note regarding PEAP on NM 0.7
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 1:05 PM, Dan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:48 -0400, Darren Albers wrote: >> If your wireless network uses PEAP and authenticates via Active >> Directory the old domain\username format no longer works (At least it >> doesn't with my network or my test networks). Instead use >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] So if your domain is test.com you use >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> Dan, if it matters I have tested this with Aruba AP's talking to Cisco >> ACS servers so it might be something particular to my setup but with >> 0.6.5 and 0.6.6 it worked using domain\username. > > I can't think of anything in NM that would have changed. Things that > would affect this would be the supplicant or the ACS server... Any idea > if those versions have changed? > > Dan > > Nope, in fact if I run 0.6.6 it works fine (I rolled back when troubleshooting it), but when I run 0.7 it fails using domain\username. I don't know if it is a big deal since [EMAIL PROTECTED] should work fine for anyone running Windows 2000 or later... It just might be confusing since most supplicants tell you to use domain\username ___ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Re: Note regarding PEAP on NM 0.7
On Mon, 2008-06-09 at 10:48 -0400, Darren Albers wrote: > If your wireless network uses PEAP and authenticates via Active > Directory the old domain\username format no longer works (At least it > doesn't with my network or my test networks). Instead use > [EMAIL PROTECTED] So if your domain is test.com you use > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Dan, if it matters I have tested this with Aruba AP's talking to Cisco > ACS servers so it might be something particular to my setup but with > 0.6.5 and 0.6.6 it worked using domain\username. I can't think of anything in NM that would have changed. Things that would affect this would be the supplicant or the ACS server... Any idea if those versions have changed? Dan ___ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
Note regarding PEAP on NM 0.7
If your wireless network uses PEAP and authenticates via Active Directory the old domain\username format no longer works (At least it doesn't with my network or my test networks). Instead use [EMAIL PROTECTED] So if your domain is test.com you use [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dan, if it matters I have tested this with Aruba AP's talking to Cisco ACS servers so it might be something particular to my setup but with 0.6.5 and 0.6.6 it worked using domain\username. Thanks! ___ NetworkManager-list mailing list NetworkManager-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list
