Re: WLAN

2012-05-31 Thread José Queiroz
2012/5/29 Daniel Ackwonu 

> Hello!
>
> My name is Daniel and I am using Ubuntu on a new HP notebook. I have got
> the problem that my Realtek Wlan card(RTL8111) is not recognized by my
> operating system. I have tried a few things but it is still not working. If
> one of you could help that would be great.
> Thank you.
>
>> iwconfig
>> lono wireless extensions.
>>
>> eth0  no wireless extensions.
>>
>> vboxnet0  no wireless extensions.
>>
>
>
Hello Daniel,

Have you posted this on the Ubuntu Forum?
http://ubuntuforum.org

You may also try to use the command below to find out which hardware you
have, and whether their drivers are correctly loaded.

sudo lshw -C network
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: WLAN

2012-05-31 Thread Larry Finger

On 05/31/2012 05:31 AM, Daniel Ackwonu wrote:

Thank you for answering!

The Output of lspci -nn is:

daniel@linzuntu:~$ lspci -nn
00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:1705]
00:01.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies Inc Device 
[1002:9647]
00:01.1 Audio device [0403]: ATI Technologies Inc Device [1002:1714]
00:02.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:1707]
00:04.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:1709]
00:05.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:170a]
00:06.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:170b]
00:10.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:7812]
(rev 03)
00:10.1 USB Controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:7812]
(rev 03)
00:11.0 SATA controller [0106]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:7804]
00:12.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:7807]
(rev 11)
00:12.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:7808]
(rev 11)
00:13.0 USB Controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:7807]
(rev 11)
00:13.2 USB Controller [0c03]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:7808]
(rev 11)
00:14.0 SMBus [0c05]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:780b] (rev 13)
00:14.1 IDE interface [0101]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:780c]
(rev 40)
00:14.2 Audio device [0403]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:780d]
(rev 01)
00:14.3 ISA bridge [0601]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:780e] (rev 
11)
00:14.4 PCI bridge [0604]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:780f] (rev 
40)
00:18.0 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:1700] (rev
43)
00:18.1 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:1701]
00:18.2 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:1702]
00:18.3 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:1703]
00:18.4 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:1704]
00:18.5 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:1718]
00:18.6 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:1716]
00:18.7 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] Device [1022:1719]
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: ATI Technologies Inc Device 
[1002:6741]
02:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller [10ec:8168] (rev 06)
03:00.0 Network controller [0280]: RaLink Device [1814:5390]
04:00.0 Class [ff00]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Device [10ec:5209] (rev 
01)
04:00.1 SD Host controller [0805]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. Device
[10ec:5209] (rev 01)


Two points of mailing list etiquette:

(1) ALWAYS use the "Reply All" button - NEVER drop any list or individual. If 
your mailer does not have that feature, get a new mailer. People like me do what 
we can to help, but only if our exchange of information is in the public record. 
If you want private consulting, you need to pay for it.


(2) Do not top post. By placing your reply at the bottom, everyone can read in 
natural order. With your reply at the top, one has to scroll down an up.


Your wireless device is the one described by:
> 03:00.0 Network controller [0280]: RaLink Device [1814:5390]

The appropriate driver for newer kernels is rt2800pci. As you did not provide 
any information regarding kernel or distro information, I have no idea if that 
driver is included in the configuration, or if your kernel is too old to have 
support for the 5390.


I suggest that you contact the mailing list for your distro and find out what it 
takes to support this device on their system. The latest versions of 
compat-wireless should work, but I have no idea if a precompiled version is 
available for your distro.


Larry
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: WLAN

2012-05-30 Thread Larry Finger

On 05/29/2012 04:18 AM, Daniel Ackwonu wrote:

Hello!

My name is Daniel and I am using Ubuntu on a new HP notebook. I have got the
problem that my Realtek Wlan card(RTL8111) is not recognized by my operating
system. I have tried a few things but it is still not working. If one of you
could help that would be great.
Thank you.

iwconfig
lo no wireless extensions.

eth0 no wireless extensions.

vboxnet0 no wireless extensions.


The Realtek RTL8111 is a wired interface, not wireless. The output of the dmesg 
command should give you some indication of why the wireless device is not 
created. You are probably missing firmware.


If the above does not provide any clues, please post the output of 'lspci -nn'.

Larry

___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: WLAN disabled by state file

2011-03-08 Thread Andrey Borzenkov
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Ozan Çağlayan  wrote:
> On 07.03.2011 19:01, Dan Williams wrote:
>
>> That message can only come from a user applet property set request from
>> D-Bus.
>
> Actually this came to my mind right after posting the e-mail. It is the
> new KDE4 applet. Should I blame it for this problem?
>

I confirm this issue under KDE NM applet; opened bug report:

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=267967
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: WLAN disabled by state file

2011-03-07 Thread Dan Williams
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 19:02 +0200, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
> On 07.03.2011 19:01, Dan Williams wrote:
> 
> > That message can only come from a user applet property set request from
> > D-Bus.
> 
> Actually this came to my mind right after posting the e-mail. It is the
> new KDE4 applet. Should I blame it for this problem?

Possibly.  Here's what *might* be going on...  usually GUI tools will
hook a UI element like a checkbox up to a property so that the checkbox
automatically updates when that property changes.  In the case of the
WiFi Enabled property, that's clearly the right thing to do as other
tools besides the applet could toggle that property without the applet's
knowledge, but the applet must still reflect the current state as
provided by NetworkManager.

But the applet must also respond to *user* initiated changes to that
checkbox as well.  Usually that happens when the applet attaches to the
signal/slot that indicates the checkbox has been toggled, and upon
receipt of that signal it tells NM to enable/disable wifi.  But if the
code also toggles the checkbox as a result of NM sending a
property-changed signal, that could result in the NM change signal
toggling the checkbox, which the applet interprets as the user clicking
on the checkbox, which the applet then handles by telling NM to
explicitly enable/disable wireless.

Basically, the applet should never update NM's user wifi state based on
signals from NM, or from NM's wifi hardware enabled state.

Dan


___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: WLAN disabled by state file

2011-03-07 Thread Ozan Çağlayan
On 07.03.2011 19:01, Dan Williams wrote:

> That message can only come from a user applet property set request from
> D-Bus.

Actually this came to my mind right after posting the e-mail. It is the
new KDE4 applet. Should I blame it for this problem?


Ozan Caglayan

--
Pardus Linux
http://www.pardus.org.tr/eng
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: WLAN disabled by state file

2011-03-07 Thread Dan Williams
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 18:03 +0200, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
> On 05.03.2011 17:31, Dan Williams wrote:
> 
> > Need a bit more debug here; the --log-level=debug logs would be useful
> > for starters.
> > 
> > Dan
> 
> Ok, the logs are attached. (This is the new NM 0.8.3.997)

Is this also with nm-applet or some other GUI applet?  The logs indicate
that something external to NM is setting wireless as disabled by the
user:

NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426968.665704] [nm-manager.c:4456]
manager_radio_user_toggled(): (WiFi): setting radio disabled by user

That message can only come from a user applet property set request from
D-Bus.

Dan


___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: WLAN disabled by state file

2011-03-06 Thread Ozan Çağlayan
On 05.03.2011 17:31, Dan Williams wrote:

> Need a bit more debug here; the --log-level=debug logs would be useful
> for starters.
> 
> Dan

Ok, the logs are attached. (This is the new NM 0.8.3.997)

Thanks,


-- 
Pardus Linux
http://www.pardus.org.tr/eng
After pressing the rfkill button on laptop:
---

NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426967.981710] [nm-netlink-monitor.c:117] 
link_msg_handler(): netlink link message: iface idx 4 flags 0x1002
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426967.984006] [nm-netlink-monitor.c:117] 
link_msg_handler(): netlink link message: iface idx 4 flags 0x1043
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426967.984789] [nm-udev-manager.c:477] 
handle_uevent(): UDEV event: action 'change' subsys 'rfkill' device 'rfkill2'
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426967.984948] [nm-udev-manager.c:204] 
recheck_killswitches(): WiFi rfkill state now 'soft-blocked'
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426967.984983] [nm-manager.c:1854] 
manager_rfkill_update_one_type(): WiFi hw-enabled 1 sw-enabled 0
NetworkManager[15750]:  WiFi now disabled by radio killswitch
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426967.985045] [nm-manager.c:1690] 
manager_update_radio_enabled(): (wlan0): setting radio disabled
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426967.985064] [nm-device-wifi.c:3757] 
real_set_enabled(): (wlan0): device now disabled
NetworkManager[15750]:  (wlan0): device state change: 8 -> 2 (reason 0)
NetworkManager[15750]:  (wlan0): deactivating device (reason: 0).
dhcpcd[15754]: received SIGTERM, stopping
dhcpcd[15754]: wlan0: removing interface
NetworkManager[15750]:  (wlan0): canceled DHCP transaction, DHCP client 
pid 15754
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426968.185839] [nm-device-wifi.c:1165] 
_set_hw_addr(): (wlan0): no MAC address change needed
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426968.185900] [nm-system.c:1362] 
flush_routes(): (wlan0): flushing routes ifindex 4 family INET (2)
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426968.186049] [nm-system.c:1277] 
dump_route():   route idx 1 family INET (2) addr 127.0.0.0/8
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426968.186076] [nm-system.c:1277] 
dump_route():   route idx 1 family INET (2) addr 127.255.255.255/32
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426968.186103] [nm-system.c:1277] 
dump_route():   route idx 1 family INET (2) addr 127.0.0.0/32
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426968.186136] [nm-system.c:1277] 
dump_route():   route idx 1 family INET (2) addr 127.0.0.1/32
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426968.186166] [nm-system.c:1277] 
dump_route():   route idx 1 family INET (2) addr 127.0.0.0/8
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426968.186203] [nm-system.c:1277] 
dump_route():   route idx 1 family INET6 (10) addr 0:0:6100::903b:6502/0
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426968.186236] [nm-system.c:1277] 
dump_route():   route idx 1 family INET6 (10) addr ::1/128
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426968.186270] [nm-system.c:1277] 
dump_route():   route idx 1 family INET6 (10) addr 0:0:9100::5812:2306/0
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426968.186399] [nm-system.c:222] 
sync_addresses(): (wlan0): syncing addresses (family 2)
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426968.639413] [nm-device-wifi.c:1331] 
real_is_available(): (wlan0): not available because not enabled
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426968.639463] [nm-device.c:3792] 
nm_device_state_changed(): (wlan0): device not yet available for transition to 
DISCONNECTED
NetworkManager[15750]:  (pid 15754) unhandled DHCP event for interface 
wlan0
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426968.647490] [nm-netlink-monitor.c:117] 
link_msg_handler(): netlink link message: iface idx 4 flags 0x1002
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299426968.665704] [nm-manager.c:4456] 
manager_radio_user_toggled(): (WiFi): setting radio disabled by user


Now the WirelessEnabled key turned to false in /var/lib/NetworkManager.state 
file. Pressing the
rfkill button again doesn't set WirelessEnabled to true again:


NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299427091.367610] [nm-udev-manager.c:477] 
handle_uevent(): UDEV event: action 'change' subsys 'rfkill' device 'rfkill2'
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299427091.367902] [nm-udev-manager.c:204] 
recheck_killswitches(): WiFi rfkill state now 'unblocked'
NetworkManager[15750]:  [1299427091.367988] [nm-manager.c:1854] 
manager_rfkill_update_one_type(): WiFi hw-enabled 1 sw-enabled 1
NetworkManager[15750]:  WiFi now enabled by radio killswitch
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: WLAN disabled by state file

2011-03-05 Thread Dan Williams
On Sat, 2011-03-05 at 15:07 +0200, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
> On 09.02.2011 19:50, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
> 
> > I think there are multiple issues in here. The one that I've mentioned
> > in the original thread and you've commented about may be triggered by
> > the bug that I've replied.
> > 
> > So with NM 0.8.2 on my Toshiba Portege R700 (iwlagn, exposing only a
> > soft rfkill which is correctly turning on/off on keypress), when I
> > sw-kill the radio, this is correctly detected by NM. The "Enable
> > Wireless" gets unchecked and WirelessEnabled=false is written to the
> > state file.

If WirelessEnabled=false gets written as a result of the rfkill, that's
wrong and is a bug.  Can you post some logs from this happening?  Better
yet, stop NM, run it with "--no-daemon --log-level=debug" and lets get
some verbose output here if we can.

Basically, WirelessEnabled should be the *user* preference, and should
be independent of whatever happens with rfkill.  But having either or
both of rfkill or WirelessEnabled off causes wireless to be off.

> > But when I unblock, NM detects this to some point (looking at the
> > debugged outputs and the code) but doesn't update the state file and
> > doesn't enable the wireless networking. So one should explicitly check
> > the "enable wireless" every time after unblocking the rfkill.
> > 
> > I think this should be fixed. I'd like to debug more but I'm really
> > getting lost in the glib/gobject mechanisms and NM code which contains a
> > lot of abstraction/callback stuff really hard to follow :(
> > 
> > 
> 
> Ping? Any idea before 0.8.4 gets released?

Need a bit more debug here; the --log-level=debug logs would be useful
for starters.

Dan


___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: WLAN disabled by state file

2011-03-05 Thread Ozan Çağlayan
On 09.02.2011 19:50, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:

> I think there are multiple issues in here. The one that I've mentioned
> in the original thread and you've commented about may be triggered by
> the bug that I've replied.
> 
> So with NM 0.8.2 on my Toshiba Portege R700 (iwlagn, exposing only a
> soft rfkill which is correctly turning on/off on keypress), when I
> sw-kill the radio, this is correctly detected by NM. The "Enable
> Wireless" gets unchecked and WirelessEnabled=false is written to the
> state file.
> 
> But when I unblock, NM detects this to some point (looking at the
> debugged outputs and the code) but doesn't update the state file and
> doesn't enable the wireless networking. So one should explicitly check
> the "enable wireless" every time after unblocking the rfkill.
> 
> I think this should be fixed. I'd like to debug more but I'm really
> getting lost in the glib/gobject mechanisms and NM code which contains a
> lot of abstraction/callback stuff really hard to follow :(
> 
> 

Ping? Any idea before 0.8.4 gets released?

-- 
Pardus Linux
http://www.pardus.org.tr/eng
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: WLAN disabled by state file

2011-02-09 Thread Ozan Çağlayan

On 09.02.2011 18:40, Dan Williams wrote:



In current NM 0.8.x git, if you uncheck "Enable Wireless" from the menu,
NM writes that to the state file.  That will then be in-force until you
re-check "Enable Wireless", even across reboots.  This takes precedence
over rfkill because it was an explicit user choice to disable wifi.
This fix was included in NM 0.8.2.

I don't think we should be relying on rfkill here, because then it's
simply magic what happens on reboot.  Some laptops expose multiple
rfkill "switches" in the kernel, others expose one, some chain them
together, etc.  It's a big mess really, and trying to rely on the kernel
behavior here isn't going to help much.  Instead, I think it's a lot
clearer that "If you turn off wifi it stays disabled til you turn it
back on".  Or?


I think there are multiple issues in here. The one that I've mentioned 
in the original thread and you've commented about may be triggered by 
the bug that I've replied.


So with NM 0.8.2 on my Toshiba Portege R700 (iwlagn, exposing only a 
soft rfkill which is correctly turning on/off on keypress), when I 
sw-kill the radio, this is correctly detected by NM. The "Enable 
Wireless" gets unchecked and WirelessEnabled=false is written to the 
state file.


But when I unblock, NM detects this to some point (looking at the 
debugged outputs and the code) but doesn't update the state file and 
doesn't enable the wireless networking. So one should explicitly check 
the "enable wireless" every time after unblocking the rfkill.


I think this should be fixed. I'd like to debug more but I'm really 
getting lost in the glib/gobject mechanisms and NM code which contains a 
lot of abstraction/callback stuff really hard to follow :(



--
Pardus Linux
http://www.pardus.org.tr/eng
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: WLAN disabled by state file

2011-02-09 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 13:00 +0200, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have bug reports about some inconsistencies caused by the state file and 
> rfkill
> interactions like when the user kills the radio and then re-enables it, the 
> WLAN can't be enabled
> unless the state file is edited manually as root, etc.
> 
> I think that when the system is booted, NM should ignore the state values in 
> the state file and
> should rely only on the rfkill status. When the user disables the WLAN 
> through nm-applet or another
> GUI, NM can internally remember this without needing that state file.
> 
> Can someone explain how the logic currently works?

In current NM 0.8.x git, if you uncheck "Enable Wireless" from the menu,
NM writes that to the state file.  That will then be in-force until you
re-check "Enable Wireless", even across reboots.  This takes precedence
over rfkill because it was an explicit user choice to disable wifi.
This fix was included in NM 0.8.2.

I don't think we should be relying on rfkill here, because then it's
simply magic what happens on reboot.  Some laptops expose multiple
rfkill "switches" in the kernel, others expose one, some chain them
together, etc.  It's a big mess really, and trying to rely on the kernel
behavior here isn't going to help much.  Instead, I think it's a lot
clearer that "If you turn off wifi it stays disabled til you turn it
back on".  Or?

Dan


___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: WLAN disabled by state file

2011-02-07 Thread José Queiroz
2011/2/7 Ozan Çağlayan 

> On 03.02.2011 13:00, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>
> And there's also another bug that I can reproduce:
>
> 1. Connect using WiFi
> 2. Soft block WiFi (result: sw_enabled=0, hw_enabled=1)
> 3. state file is updated to WirelessEnabled=false
> 4. Unblock wifi (result: sw_enabled=1, hw_enabled=1)
> 5. state file is not updated and stays the same
> 6. WiFi doesn't come up automatically unless the "Enable wireless
> networking" is clicked in the UI.
>


I confirm that this happens here, too.
NM 0.8.1+git.20101009t040337.01fa170-0ubuntu1~nmt1~lucid1
Kubuntu 10.04, NM from ppa/Launchpad.
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list


Re: WLAN disabled by state file

2011-02-07 Thread Ozan Çağlayan

On 03.02.2011 13:00, Ozan Çağlayan wrote:

Hi,


And there's also another bug that I can reproduce:

1. Connect using WiFi
2. Soft block WiFi (result: sw_enabled=0, hw_enabled=1)
3. state file is updated to WirelessEnabled=false
4. Unblock wifi (result: sw_enabled=1, hw_enabled=1)
5. state file is not updated and stays the same
6. WiFi doesn't come up automatically unless the "Enable wireless 
networking" is clicked in the UI.


--
Pardus Linux
http://www.pardus.org.tr/eng
___
networkmanager-list mailing list
networkmanager-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/networkmanager-list