Re: [newbie] XFree 4.0.3

2001-03-19 Thread Mathias De Belder

On Sun, Mar 18, 2001 at 11:50:57AM -0700, Chris Cameron wrote:
 How would I go about upgrading my X to 4.0.3 running Mandrake 7.2?

Just wait untill Mandrakesoft makes some compatible RPMS for LM7.2. 

The upgrade from 4.0.2 to 4.0.3 is rather small, so it won't take long 
before Mandrakesoft, or some knowledgeable people, make you a nice RPM :)




Re: [newbie] Disk usage

2001-03-11 Thread Mathias De Belder

On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 01:43:46PM -0400, Renaud OLGIATI wrote:
 I've been trying to find a way to get, for each sub-directory of a given 
 directory, the total amount of disk-space used up by that sub-directory and 
 all its sub-sub-directories.
 
 Is there a way to do this with du ,
 
 Or any other way ?
 
Hmm, there are probably easier ways to do this, but this should get you 
started : go to a random dir and type 'du  filexyz.txt'. 

Edit this textfile to get the requested numbers. After giving you the size 
of each subdir in a subdir, it eventually gives you the entire size of that 
subdir with its own subdirs.

I hope this will help you,
Mathias




Re: [newbie] make bzImage when compiling kernel-2.4.2

2001-03-04 Thread Mathias De Belder

On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 02:28:30PM -, dooshiant % wrote:
 hello
 
 I am unable to make bzImage when compiling the 2.4.2 kernel.
 Each time I get the message below.
 Can anyone help me out...

snip

 In file included from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/string.h:21,
  from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/fs.h:23,
  from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/
 /usr/src/linux/include/asm/string.h:312: `current' undeclared (first use in 
 this function)
 make: *** [init/main.o] Error 1

Hmm, you problably forgot to make a symbolic link. You should extract your 
kernel under /usr/src/2.4.2 and then make a symbolic link, called 'linux',
to that dir. Otherwise, you'll get the error messages you just discribed.

So :bunzip2 -d kernel-2.4.2.tar.bz2
tar -xvf kernel-2.4.2.tar /usr/src/
cd /usr/src/
mv linux 2.4.2
ln -s 2.4.2 linux
cd linux

After you've done that, your kernel should compile as expected.




Re: [newbie] 7.2 says i've got a PIII ?!

2000-11-26 Thread Mathias De Belder

 Last question.  Do i have to compile the kernel for 586 or 686 then?  I assume
 686, isn't it?  ;-)

If I recall correctly, Mandrake supplies a patched kernel of the plain
vanilla 2.2.17 kernel. It is optimised for i586 architectures, which
means that any CPU ranging from a P60 to a P233MMX will benifit from it.
The K6-family from AMD will also get a small speed increase. But, since
CPU's are backward compatible, i686 CPU's, like the PII(I), CeleronI(I)
and Athlon will work on it.

You could recompile your kernel, but you won't feel much of a speed
increase. To get real optimisations for your system, you would have to
recompile EVERY program again from the source files for i686. Mandrake
already does this for i586 systems, that's why their distro's won't work
on 486's or anything lower.

So you better leave your kernel as it is right now, and wait for a more
mature version of the 2.4 kernel (although 2.4.0-test11 is sufficient
for home use). Optimising your kernel for i686 will have limited effect
on the speed of your system.




Re: [newbie] 7.2 says i've got a PIII ?!

2000-11-25 Thread Mathias De Belder

   Under my laptop, owning a Celeron 500 mhz, Mandrake 7.2 says it's got a
   PIII Copermine... what's wrong??  8-?
 
  Your Celeron 500 is probably a CeleronII. This is the successor of the
  CeleronA and it's based on the .18=B5 Coppermine core of the PIII. Only
  the cache and the L2 associativity have been altered, and it runs on a
  slower Front Side Bus speed.
 
  Linux Mandrake is correct in telling you that you have a PIII ;-)
 
  BUT, the CeleronII's performance is WAY of that of a regular PIII due to
  the mentioned L2 cache associativity...
 
  cat /proc/cpuinfo should tell you more.
 
 Good to know... that program answers me i'm forbidden to run it -running it
 as root, of course-  8-?
 
 Do you know if it's easy to overclock??  ;-)

I'm surprised it won't let you see that file. As a user, just type : 
'cat /proc/cpuinfo' and it should give you the details of your CPU.

Overclocking a laptop isn't really recommended, although the Celeron's have 
historicly been very good overclockers.

As you've probably noticed by now, your laptop is generating quite a bit of
heat. Overclocking your CPU will only make it worse. To save costs and space 
and to not drain the battery too much, mobile Intel CPU's are only passivly 
cooled. In my opinion, those CPU's are already being pushed to the limit. One 
can seriously damage one's CPU by letting it overheat too much.

So it's better to leave your setup as it is. If you would really want to 
overclock, see if you can adjust your Front Side Bus speed from within your 
laptop's BIOS.

Just my .03 Euro (damn exchange rate ;)




Re: [newbie] Where is sndconfig, please? -- Urgent!

2000-11-25 Thread Mathias De Belder

 Everything seems to be fine, but I can't find the "sndconfig" command
 and program to configure my sound. Until I do so, I can't listen to
 RealPlayer. I tried it in the console and in KDE's xterm.

 This is the first time in two years of using Linux that I have had this
 error message.
 
 Would very much appreciate your help.

If I recall correctly, sndconfig isn't installed by default. It's on the
second cd, and you can install it from there. 

ALSA (http://www.alsa-project.org/) has now become the most important
provider for sound under Linux. I suggest you download the driver
package and install it.




Re: [newbie] 7.2 says i've got a PIII ?!

2000-11-24 Thread Mathias De Belder

 Under my laptop, owning a Celeron 500 mhz, Mandrake 7.2 says it's got a
 PIII Copermine... what's wrong??  8-?

Your Celeron 500 is probably a CeleronII. This is the successor of the
CeleronA and it's based on the .18ยต Coppermine core of the PIII. Only
the cache and the L2 associativity have been altered, and it runs on a
slower Front Side Bus speed.

Linux Mandrake is correct in telling you that you have a PIII ;-)

BUT, the CeleronII's performance is WAY of that of a regular PIII due to
the mentioned L2 cache associativity...

cat /proc/cpuinfo should tell you more.