Re: [newbie] HELP-BIOS can't recognize new HD

2003-04-05 Thread Anne Wilson
On Saturday 05 Apr 2003 6:51 am, Todd Slater wrote:
 Todd said:
 It actually took a little while to figure out that /tmp stuff, but hey,
 it's done now! Except now it reports the drive is 37GB instead of 40.
 Not sure what's up with that.

Could this be the old 1000 vs. 1024 argument?

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] HELP-BIOS can't recognize new HD

2003-04-05 Thread et
On Saturday 05 April 2003 12:51 am, Todd Slater wrote:
 Todd said:
   Would you happen to know if updating the bios will affect anything
   on the HD? Or, will it just all of a sudden be able to see all 40
   gigs and I can re-do my partitions?

 Ian said:
  A good question!  To recognise all the drive you'll have to do a
  partition and format, so if you've got anything on there you want to
  keep, back it up. See if you can create a new partition in the extra
  bit.  Anybody else come across this one?
  Anyhow Todd, let us know what happens!

 I was able to update the BIOS without any problem. Most of the problem I
 had was with my slave drive, which reported something about a bad
 superblock or something. It wouldn't boot so I went in to /etc/fstab and
 just commented out that bad partition and then I could boot into Mdk.

 My goal was to add the new space to /home. The problem was that
 the free space was at the end of the drive, and I had a /tmp
 partition between them.

 Having backed up everything I cared about, I deleted /home and rebooted
 in non-graphic mode. I logged in as root, copied /tmp to a backup
 directory, and somehow got /tmp umounted and ran diskdrake to delete
 /tmp, create a new /home and then recreate /tmp. I had problems starting
 x from command line, and it turned out to be another warning about
 superblock in /tmp. I reformatted /tmp, copied the stuff from backup
 there, restarted and bingo!

 It actually took a little while to figure out that /tmp stuff, but hey,
 it's done now! Except now it reports the drive is 37GB instead of 40.
 Not sure what's up with that.

 Thanks for your help.

 Todd
You know (of course) that it really does not make all that much difference 
where /tmp is on the drive, in relation to other linux partitions
-- 
Linux counter number 167806

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] HELP-BIOS can't recognize new HD

2003-04-05 Thread Richard Urwin
On Saturday 05 Apr 2003 10:09 am, Anne Wilson wrote:
 On Saturday 05 Apr 2003 6:51 am, Todd Slater wrote:
  Todd said:
  It actually took a little while to figure out that /tmp stuff, but hey,
  it's done now! Except now it reports the drive is 37GB instead of 40.
  Not sure what's up with that.

 Could this be the old 1000 vs. 1024 argument?

37 x 1024^3  = 39.7 x 10^9
40x10^9  = 37.253 x 1024^3
Looks like you're right.

It wont actually be either of these numbers, of course, since although 
bytes-per-sector is a power of two, sectors-per-track, tracks-per-surface and 
surfaces-per-unit are not generally powers of either two or ten.

-- 
Richard Urwin

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] HELP-BIOS can't recognize new HD

2003-03-31 Thread Ian Trickett
The latest beta BIOS for the P5A and the P5A-B will recognise large hard
drives.  I'M running one of each with 40Gb Maxtor discs (Under W98) with no
difficulties.(other than the MS related ones!)
The BIOS is No 1011.005 and can be downloaded from
http://www.asus.com/support/download/item.aspx?ModelName=P5A

Be warned that the ASUS site is probably one of the most annoying that you
are likely to come across - it seems to be designed to hide the information
you are looking for and each page takes an eternity to load!  If you can
find your way into the German FTP site things go much quicker.  There's also
more to choose from.

Ian




In the interests of economy, the light at the end of the tunnel has been
turned off.
- Original Message -
From: todd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2003 10:37 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] HELP-BIOS can't recognize new HD


 On Sunday 30 March 2003 04:05 pm, Charles A Edwards wrote:
  On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 15:33:38 -0500
 
  todd slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   If anybody knows of a good but cheap mobo that will support large hard
   drives and take an AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED], and at least 512MB RAM, I'm all ears.
 
  Todd, another option be to get an add-on pci ide controller card.
  Since they operate with there own bios they would be able to bypass the
  hd limitations of your mobo bios.
 
  You can find them online for $25 or less.
 
 
  Charles

 That's a great tip, thanks Charles! I'm going to check it out soon as I
get
 some thorns pulled out!

 Todd








 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


[newbie] HELP-BIOS can't recognize new HD

2003-03-30 Thread todd slater
So I got a new hard drive and thought I'd install 9.1 on it. The problem is, I 
can't get my bios to see is as either master or slave. I skipped the 
autodetection and was able to install 9.1 on it, but I guess bios doesn't see 
the drive still and it won't boot into it. I tried to create a boot floppy 
but that gives me an error and prompts for a system disk.

I thought maybe I had to format the HD (Seagate) first, so I tried to get a 
dos image, but most of those are .exe and I don't have Windoze. The one 
non-.exe image I found was in German and when I tried to run fdisk it 
returned some error.

If I run the new HD as slave, it won't boot the old HD.

I went to Seagate's site and tried to get their DiscWizard, but their bootable 
floppy is--you guessed it--an .exe.

I have 9.1 on my old hd, but this is really annoying.

The 9.1 install was sweet, and KDE is actually pretty fast on my machine. And 
fonts are purty!!

Can you offer some pointers for this [EMAIL PROTECTED]

MOBO-Asus p5a
HD-Seagate ST340014a (40gb)

Todd

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] HELP-BIOS can't recognize new HD

2003-03-30 Thread Tom Brinkman
On Sunday March 30 2003 11:03 am, todd slater wrote:
 So I got a new hard drive and thought I'd install 9.1 on it. The
 problem is, I can't get my bios to see is as either master or
 slave. I skipped the autodetection and was able to install 9.1 on
 it, but I guess bios doesn't see the drive still and it won't boot
 into it. I tried to create a boot floppy but that gives me an error
 and prompts for a system disk.

You were able to do the 9.1 install because your bios can see the 
drive you had the CD in, and Linux could see your new drive.  BUT, 
this still leaves you with your motherboard/bios not seein it.

How big is the drive?  and how old is your bios?  It could be 
that the bios doesn't recognize drives over a certain size.  You can 
get that info from the motherboard's manual or website. Until you get 
bios to recognize it, you're sort'a SOL. The drive doesn't need to be 
formatted first for this.

  If the bios can handle drives that size:  Make certain the drive's 
jumper is correctly (check again ;) set to master or slave, not cable 
select. You can sometimes get away with not doin so, but often the 
master drive must be on the ide cable's end connector, and slave 
drive on the middle connector.  If only one drive is on the cable, it 
must be master, and the end connector should be used. Try a differnet 
ide cable, reseat the connections.

   I've also seen some drives where there were more than one way to 
set the jumper for master.  I've also seen drives where the diagram 
on the drive or it's instructions, didn't match the (number of) pins.
I had an IBM like that, had to go to IBM's website to get the correct 
diagram.

-- 
Tom Brinkman  Corpus Christi, Texas

Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] HELP-BIOS can't recognize new HD

2003-03-30 Thread Anne Wilson
On Sunday 30 Mar 2003 7:16 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
 On Sunday March 30 2003 11:03 am, todd slater wrote:
  So I got a new hard drive and thought I'd install 9.1 on it. The
  problem is, I can't get my bios to see is as either master or
  slave. I skipped the autodetection and was able to install 9.1 on
  it, but I guess bios doesn't see the drive still and it won't boot
  into it. I tried to create a boot floppy but that gives me an error
  and prompts for a system disk.

 You were able to do the 9.1 install because your bios can see the
 drive you had the CD in, and Linux could see your new drive.  BUT,
 this still leaves you with your motherboard/bios not seein it.

 How big is the drive?  and how old is your bios?  It could be
 that the bios doesn't recognize drives over a certain size.  You can
 get that info from the motherboard's manual or website. Until you get
 bios to recognize it, you're sort'a SOL. The drive doesn't need to be
 formatted first for this.

   If the bios can handle drives that size:  Make certain the drive's
 jumper is correctly (check again ;) set to master or slave, not cable
 select. You can sometimes get away with not doin so, but often the
 master drive must be on the ide cable's end connector, and slave
 drive on the middle connector.  If only one drive is on the cable, it
 must be master, and the end connector should be used. Try a differnet
 ide cable, reseat the connections.

I've also seen some drives where there were more than one way to
 set the jumper for master.  I've also seen drives where the diagram
 on the drive or it's instructions, didn't match the (number of) pins.
 I had an IBM like that, had to go to IBM's website to get the correct
 diagram.

IIRC Seagates don't use the same jumper scheme as most others.  I think it has 
different settings for stand alone and master with slave, and I don't think 
it accepts the no jumper setup that many others do.

Could be wrong, but definitely worth checking up.

Anne
-- 
Registered Linux User No.293302


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] HELP-BIOS can't recognize new HD

2003-03-30 Thread Charles A Edwards
On Sun, 30 Mar 2003 15:33:38 -0500
todd slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 If anybody knows of a good but cheap mobo that will support large hard
 drives and take an AMD [EMAIL PROTECTED], and at least 512MB RAM, I'm all ears.


Todd, another option be to get an add-on pci ide controller card.
Since they operate with there own bios they would be able to bypass the
hd limitations of your mobo bios.

You can find them online for $25 or less.


Charles

-- 
Tonight's the night: Sleep in a eucalyptus tree.
-
Mandrake Linux 9.1 on PurpleDragon
Kernel- 2.4.21-0.13mdk
-



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature