Re: [newbie] IMPORTANT (was) Fw: cheval-de-frise
Anne, looks like it was sent from adsl-67-122-222-126.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net to the list, but wasn't a spoof (otherwise we'd see bounces from it). Michael -- Michael Viron Core Systems Group Simple End User Linux At 09:51 AM 9/4/2003 +0100, you wrote: On Thursday 04 Sep 2003 9:02 am, Anne Wilson wrote: If an email comes in with new words, but is classified properly with the previous words (ie i don't reclassify it), do any new words get added to the table? I looks as if they don't. I replied to this, explaining my use of magnets. This morning I have received one with the subject: [expert] Re: Approved. It is the one with the .pif attachment. If anyone else is using magnets for the list traffic, now is the time to reconsider. Looking at the headers, I'm confused. I was looking for something that could categorically say that it had come from the Mandrake lists. This is what I found: X-POPFile-TimeoutPrevention: 0 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp.mandrake.org (212.43.244.24) by mk-cpfrontend.uk.tiscali.com (6.7.018) id 3F547F72003A439B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:10:51 +0100 Received: from smtp.mandrax.org (smtp.mandrax.org [80.67.180.169]) by smtp.mandrake.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940C94A916C; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 10:17:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by smtp.mandrax.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 78D7956A07; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 04:25:21 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from TOSHIBA-LT (adsl-67-122-222-126.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [67.122.222.126]) by smtp.mandrax.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01C456A09 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 04:23:47 +0200 (CEST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 1:09:24 --0700 X-Mailscanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_01DAA9DE Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Loop: newbie@ X-Sequence: 1536 Precedence: list X-Validation-BY: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [newbie] Re: Your application Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Text-Classification: ham Status: R X-Status: N X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState: Could someone more experienced look it over for me. Is it really coming in as a false list email, as I first thought, or is it a virused list member affecting us all? Anne -- Registered Linux User No.293302 Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet? Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] IMPORTANT (was) Fw: cheval-de-frise
If an email comes in with new words, but is classified properly with the previous words (ie i don't reclassify it), do any new words get added to the table? I looks as if they don't. I replied to this, explaining my use of magnets. This morning I have received one with the subject: [expert] Re: Approved. It is the one with the .pif attachment. If anyone else is using magnets for the list traffic, now is the time to reconsider. Anne -- Registered Linux User No.293302 Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet? Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] IMPORTANT (was) Fw: cheval-de-frise
On Thursday 04 Sep 2003 9:02 am, Anne Wilson wrote: If an email comes in with new words, but is classified properly with the previous words (ie i don't reclassify it), do any new words get added to the table? I looks as if they don't. I replied to this, explaining my use of magnets. This morning I have received one with the subject: [expert] Re: Approved. It is the one with the .pif attachment. If anyone else is using magnets for the list traffic, now is the time to reconsider. Looking at the headers, I'm confused. I was looking for something that could categorically say that it had come from the Mandrake lists. This is what I found: X-POPFile-TimeoutPrevention: 0 Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp.mandrake.org (212.43.244.24) by mk-cpfrontend.uk.tiscali.com (6.7.018) id 3F547F72003A439B for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:10:51 +0100 Received: from smtp.mandrax.org (smtp.mandrax.org [80.67.180.169]) by smtp.mandrake.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940C94A916C; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 10:17:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: by smtp.mandrax.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 78D7956A07; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 04:25:21 +0200 (CEST) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from TOSHIBA-LT (adsl-67-122-222-126.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [67.122.222.126]) by smtp.mandrax.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01C456A09 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 04:23:47 +0200 (CEST) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 1:09:24 --0700 X-Mailscanner: Found to be clean Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600. X-Msmail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_NextPart_000_01DAA9DE Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Loop: newbie@ X-Sequence: 1536 Precedence: list X-Validation-BY: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [newbie] Re: Your application Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Text-Classification: ham Status: R X-Status: N X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState: Could someone more experienced look it over for me. Is it really coming in as a false list email, as I first thought, or is it a virused list member affecting us all? Anne -- Registered Linux User No.293302 Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet? Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
