Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist
Todd Slater wrote: On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:43:18PM -0500, Charles A Edwards wrote: On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:30:26 -0500 JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Viagra! Penis DON'T LOSE ANY MORE MONEY ON YOUR EXISTING HOME LOAN! Todd Paris Hilton video - why do people keep offering me a video of a hotel? Margot Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist
Margot wrote: Todd Slater wrote: On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:43:18PM -0500, Charles A Edwards wrote: On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:30:26 -0500 JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Viagra! Penis DON'T LOSE ANY MORE MONEY ON YOUR EXISTING HOME LOAN! Todd Paris Hilton video - why do people keep offering me a video of a hotel? Margot You too, John Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:41:05 -0400 Adolfo Bello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It was filtered, didn't it? You have to change: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] to * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Actually, the way I did it worked, but yes, yours would be more accurate. Thanks! -- JoeHill ++ ICQ # 280779813 Registered Linux user #282046 Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org +++ If those in charge of our society - politicians, corporate executives, and owners of press and television - can dominate our ideas, they will be secure in their power. They will not need soldiers patrolling the streets. We will control ourselves.-- Howard Zinn Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 21:15:39 -0500 Todd Slater [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Viagra! Penis DON'T LOSE ANY MORE MONEY ON YOUR EXISTING HOME LOAN! ROTFLMAO! Thanks guys, really funny stuff. Jeez, what would I do without this list. The technical help is great, but the humour is still the best part... -- JoeHill ++ ICQ # 280779813 Registered Linux user #282046 Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org +++ The philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways. The point, however, is to change it.-- Karl Marx Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist
On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:38:39 + Margot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paris Hilton video - why do people keep offering me a video of a hotel? LOL! What don't you get a chill watching video of a static object? It's the latest in porn... -- JoeHill ++ ICQ # 280779813 Registered Linux user #282046 Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org +++ Athens built the Acropolis. Corinth was a commercial city, interested in purely materialistic things. Today we admire Athens, visit it, preserve the old temples, yet we hardly ever set foot in Corinth.-- Dr. Harold Urey, Nobel Laureate in chemistry Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 11:24, JoeHill wrote:
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:30:26 -0500
JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Viagra!
This may be where I need to start learning about locking as well.
I got an error in pmlog at one point:
procmail: Timeout, was waiting for /var/spool/mail/joehill
Am I correct in assuming that this is to do with the fact that my recipe
referencing /var/spool/mail/joehill:
:0
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{
:0
/var/spool/mail/joehill
}
is the cause of this, in that it has no lock, ie. the trailing colon after
:0?
Joe:
You should write that recipe as:
:0
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/var/spool/mail/joehill
From man procmailrc:
===
A line starting with ':' marks the beginning of a recipe. It has the
following format:
:0 [flags] [ : [locallockfile] ]
zero or more conditions (one per line)
exactly one action line
===
So it looks like the recipe is waiting for an answer from
/var/spool/mail/joehill.
HTH
--
Adolfo A. Bello B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Make your posts more effective. Learn how at
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListEtiquette
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist
On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 13:38:33 -0400
Adolfo Bello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should write that recipe as:
:0
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/var/spool/mail/joehill
From man procmailrc:
===
A line starting with ':' marks the beginning of a recipe. It has the
following format:
:0 [flags] [ : [locallockfile] ]
zero or more conditions (one per line)
exactly one action line
===
So it looks like the recipe is waiting for an answer from
/var/spool/mail/joehill.
I've been following the format I originally snagged from Stephen K.'s site:
http://thor.prohosting.com/~kilgoret/files/procmailrc
So that my recipe file looks like this:
:0
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{
:0:
/var/spool/mail/joehill
}
:0
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{
:0:
/var/spool/mail/joehill
}
:0
* !^Message-Id
{
:0
$MAILDIR/spam
}
:0
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{
:0
/dev/null
}
:0
* ^Subject:.*joehill
{
:0
$MAILDIR/spam
}
:0
* ^Subject:.hi$
{
:0
$MAILDIR/spam
}
:0
* ^Message-Id:.*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
{
:0
$MAILDIR/spam
}
:0 B
* .*viagra
{
:0
/dev/null
}
as you can see, I added a lock (:) to the rules which forward to
/var/spool/mail/joehill, as I think what was happening was if I got two mails
both trying to write to there, it was timing out. Since adding the lock, I don't
seem to be having any probs, but I'll keep an eye on it.
I've been reading everything I can get my hands on for Procmail, esp the list
archives, and I'm *beginning*, I think, to understand the concept of the
lock, among other things.
Cheers!
--
JoeHill ++ ICQ # 280779813
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org
+++
I'm even lethal when I'm unarmed, 'cuz I'm louder than a bomb!
-- Chuck D.
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist
On Fri, 2003-12-05 at 13:47, JoeHill wrote:
On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 13:38:33 -0400
Adolfo Bello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should write that recipe as:
:0
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/var/spool/mail/joehill
From man procmailrc:
===
A line starting with ':' marks the beginning of a recipe. It has the
following format:
:0 [flags] [ : [locallockfile] ]
zero or more conditions (one per line)
exactly one action line
===
So it looks like the recipe is waiting for an answer from
/var/spool/mail/joehill.
I've been following the format I originally snagged from Stephen K.'s site:
http://thor.prohosting.com/~kilgoret/files/procmailrc
So that my recipe file looks like this:
:0
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{
:0:
/var/spool/mail/joehill
}
:0
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{
:0:
/var/spool/mail/joehill
}
:0
* !^Message-Id
{
:0
$MAILDIR/spam
}
:0
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{
:0
/dev/null
}
:0
* ^Subject:.*joehill
{
:0
$MAILDIR/spam
}
:0
* ^Subject:.hi$
{
:0
$MAILDIR/spam
}
:0
* ^Message-Id:.*[EMAIL PROTECTED]
{
:0
$MAILDIR/spam
}
:0 B
* .*viagra
{
:0
/dev/null
}
as you can see, I added a lock (:) to the rules which forward to
/var/spool/mail/joehill, as I think what was happening was if I got two mails
both trying to write to there, it was timing out. Since adding the lock, I don't
seem to be having any probs, but I'll keep an eye on it.
I've been reading everything I can get my hands on for Procmail, esp the list
archives, and I'm *beginning*, I think, to understand the concept of the
lock, among other things.
Cheers!
I don't see the point of having something that does nothing. Rewriting
the recipe the way I wrote it does the same thing as using the recipe
with {} and a second :0.
I really respect Stephen's knowledge but in this case I don't see any
point in having a recipe like:
:0
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* ^Subject:.*
{
:0
/dev/null
}
which translates into: if the message is coming from any body at
fc.emc.com.ph *and* the subject is any thing, send it to /dev/null. To
me, the subject line is adding no value to the recipe.
Take a look at man procmailex (procmailrc examples), specially at the
second example, and see how they avoid using unneeded {}.
Wow, you made me read some stuffs before posting a reply :-)
Saludos,
--
Adolfo A. Bello B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Make your posts more effective. Learn how at
http://mandrake.vmlinuz.ca/bin/view/Main/MandrakeMailingListEtiquette
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist
On Friday 05 December 2003 07:56 am, JoeHill wrote: On Fri, 05 Dec 2003 11:38:39 + Margot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Paris Hilton video - why do people keep offering me a video of a hotel? LOL! What don't you get a chill watching video of a static object? It's the latest in porn... I'll be damned. You mean that people actually move during sex? I learn something every day. -- cmg Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
[newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist
Viagra! -- JoeHill ++ ICQ # 280779813 Registered Linux user #282046 Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org +++ Reality is what you can get away with. -- Robert Anton Wilson Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:30:26 -0500 JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Viagra! It works! Woot! I's learnin', sorry to bombard like this... -- JoeHill ++ ICQ # 280779813 Registered Linux user #282046 Homepage: www.orderinchaos.org +++ Where the state begins, individual liberty ceases, and vice versa. -- Bakunin Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist
It was filtered, didn't it? You have to change: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] to * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Saludos, Adolfo Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:30:26 -0500 JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Viagra! Penis -- Collar points don't match, and you've trimmed all the seams -- Murphy's Laws of Sewing n°13 - Mandrake Linux 10.0 on PurpleDragon Kernel-2.6.0-0.2mdkenterprise http://www.eslrahc.com - pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 21:43, Charles A Edwards wrote: On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:30:26 -0500 JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Viagra! Penis spamassassin Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist
On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:47:46 -0400 Adolfo Bello [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: spamassassin not big enough -- Collar points don't match, and you've trimmed all the seams -- Murphy's Laws of Sewing n°13 - Mandrake Linux 10.0 on PurpleDragon Kernel-2.6.0-0.2mdkenterprise http://www.eslrahc.com - pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [newbie] Testing Procmail Whitelist
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 08:43:18PM -0500, Charles A Edwards wrote: On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 20:30:26 -0500 JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Viagra! Penis DON'T LOSE ANY MORE MONEY ON YOUR EXISTING HOME LOAN! Todd Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
