[newbie] darned networking tables
I just noticed an annoying ethernet redundancy and I can't figure how to get rid of it. Or maybe I'm not noticing anything and I'm just crazy. You tell me... # netstat -rn Kernel IP routing table DestinationGateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface (my isp) 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0ppp0 (my network.0) (my ip) 255.255.255.0UG 0 0 0eth0 (my network.0) 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0U 0 0 0eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0U 0 0 0lo 0.0.0.0(my isp) 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0ppp0 Okay, why am I eth0'ing thru my localhost ip (2nd entry) to my network? Obviously I need the 0.0.0.0 to my network (3rd entry), but isn't #2 redundant? If so, what are the ramifications of it being like this and how do I fix it? I've tried route del'ing, but all i get is: # route del 192.168.0.0 SIOCDELRT: no such process Any suggestions/explanations would be much appreciated. - Isaac ps: I have a copy and have read the Network Administrator's Guide, so if you know where to send me in there you can just give me a chapter or page number instead of typing it all out yourself. Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] darned networking tables
ip for my machine is 192.168.0.1 (thats the my ip in the table) ip for network is 192.168.0.0 (my network.0 as i wrote it) everything with the network is fine, it seems i can ping back and forth without any trouble ifconfig looks great i just dont know how to get rid of that annoying 2nd eth0 to 192.168.0.0 - isaac Quoting etharp [EMAIL PROTECTED]: is the IP for your machine end in .0? needs to end in .1 to .253 as I believe the 192.168.0.0 is reserved as well as 192.168.0.255. the 0.0.0.0 is default until they are assigned a IP from dhcp it is not a problem (normally) for an interface to have more than one entry. what does ifconfig say? On Saturday 18 August 2001 07:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just noticed an annoying ethernet redundancy and I can't figure how to get rid of it. Or maybe I'm not noticing anything and I'm just crazy. You tell me... # netstat -rn Kernel IP routing table DestinationGateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface (my isp) 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0 (my network.0) (my ip) 255.255.255.0UG 0 0 0 eth0 (my network.0) 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0(my isp) 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0 Okay, why am I eth0'ing thru my localhost ip (2nd entry) to my network? Obviously I need the 0.0.0.0 to my network (3rd entry), but isn't #2 redundant? If so, what are the ramifications of it being like this and how do I fix it? I've tried route del'ing, but all i get is: # route del 192.168.0.0 SIOCDELRT: no such process Any suggestions/explanations would be much appreciated. - Isaac ps: I have a copy and have read the Network Administrator's Guide, so if you know where to send me in there you can just give me a chapter or page number instead of typing it all out yourself. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; name=message.footer Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Description: Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] darned networking tables
is the IP for your machine end in .0? needs to end in .1 to .253 as I believe the 192.168.0.0 is reserved as well as 192.168.0.255. the 0.0.0.0 is default until they are assigned a IP from dhcp it is not a problem (normally) for an interface to have more than one entry. what does ifconfig say? On Saturday 18 August 2001 07:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just noticed an annoying ethernet redundancy and I can't figure how to get rid of it. Or maybe I'm not noticing anything and I'm just crazy. You tell me... # netstat -rn Kernel IP routing table DestinationGateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface (my isp) 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0ppp0 (my network.0) (my ip) 255.255.255.0UG 0 0 0eth0 (my network.0) 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0U 0 0 0eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0U 0 0 0lo 0.0.0.0(my isp) 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0ppp0 Okay, why am I eth0'ing thru my localhost ip (2nd entry) to my network? Obviously I need the 0.0.0.0 to my network (3rd entry), but isn't #2 redundant? If so, what are the ramifications of it being like this and how do I fix it? I've tried route del'ing, but all i get is: # route del 192.168.0.0 SIOCDELRT: no such process Any suggestions/explanations would be much appreciated. - Isaac ps: I have a copy and have read the Network Administrator's Guide, so if you know where to send me in there you can just give me a chapter or page number instead of typing it all out yourself. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; name=message.footer Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Description: Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://.mandrakestore.com
Re: [newbie] darned networking tables
linuxconf? netconf. On Saturday 18 August 2001 08:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ip for my machine is 192.168.0.1 (thats the my ip in the table) ip for network is 192.168.0.0 (my network.0 as i wrote it) everything with the network is fine, it seems i can ping back and forth without any trouble ifconfig looks great i just dont know how to get rid of that annoying 2nd eth0 to 192.168.0.0 - isaac Quoting etharp [EMAIL PROTECTED]: is the IP for your machine end in .0? needs to end in .1 to .253 as I believe the 192.168.0.0 is reserved as well as 192.168.0.255. the 0.0.0.0 is default until they are assigned a IP from dhcp it is not a problem (normally) for an interface to have more than one entry. what does ifconfig say? On Saturday 18 August 2001 07:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just noticed an annoying ethernet redundancy and I can't figure how to get rid of it. Or maybe I'm not noticing anything and I'm just crazy. You tell me... # netstat -rn Kernel IP routing table DestinationGateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface (my isp) 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0 (my network.0) (my ip) 255.255.255.0UG 0 0 0 eth0 (my network.0) 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0U 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0(my isp) 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0 Okay, why am I eth0'ing thru my localhost ip (2nd entry) to my network? Obviously I need the 0.0.0.0 to my network (3rd entry), but isn't #2 redundant? If so, what are the ramifications of it being like this and how do I fix it? I've tried route del'ing, but all i get is: # route del 192.168.0.0 SIOCDELRT: no such process Any suggestions/explanations would be much appreciated. - Isaac ps: I have a copy and have read the Network Administrator's Guide, so if you know where to send me in there you can just give me a chapter or page number instead of typing it all out yourself. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; name=message.footer Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Description: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; name=message.footer Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Description: Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://.mandrakestore.com
