[newbie] mozilla M16
I only have one for this one.AWESOME! It is WAY better than the beta release of Netscape 6. By lightyears even. If this is any indication of the final version of Netscape 6 is going to be I can't wait! It's great. Thanks Netscape. You guys are doing a fine job. -- Mark I love my Linux Box... REASON # 2 ...X-windows is just a suedonym. Registered Linux user # 1299563
Re: [newbie] mozilla M16
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, you wrote: I only have one for this one.AWESOME! It is WAY better than the beta release of Netscape 6. By lightyears even. If this is any indication of the final version of Netscape 6 is going to be I can't wait! It's great. Thanks Netscape. You guys are doing a fine job. On the cooker list the developers are saying that M16 is Netscape 6. I've taken a look at Mozzila a few times, the last being M16. I found it slow and buggy, more so than NS 4.7x OTOH, KDE2 and Konquerer should be here by Sept. -- ~~ Tom Brinkman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [newbie] mozilla M16
I'd like to see an RPM of M16 with the SSL capabilities available through a second RPM. Too bad so many governments have to be so uptight over encryption. Tom Brinkman wrote: On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, you wrote: I only have one for this one.AWESOME! It is WAY better than the beta release of Netscape 6. By lightyears even. If this is any indication of the final version of Netscape 6 is going to be I can't wait! It's great. Thanks Netscape. You guys are doing a fine job. On the cooker list the developers are saying that M16 is Netscape 6. I've taken a look at Mozzila a few times, the last being M16. I found it slow and buggy, more so than NS 4.7x OTOH, KDE2 and Konquerer should be here by Sept. -- ~~ Tom Brinkman[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Digital Wokan Tribal mage of the electronics age Guerilla Linux Warrior
Re: [newbie] mozilla M16
On 2 Jul 00, at 18:16, Digital Wokan wrote: I'd like to see an RPM of M16 with the SSL capabilities available through a second RPM. Too bad so many governments have to be so uptight over encryption. What's wrong with a binary tarball? It installs pretty well, but the SSL tunneling facility is prety poor as you say. Read the mozilla developer postings and ask there if there's any way to do that. Sthitaprajna | (at)mailandnews(dot)com "So many people, so little purpose."
