Re: [newbie] defragmentation

2003-07-01 Thread Robin Turner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, but it would be very usefull if the most experienced ppl on this mail
list
would give us an explanation or some usefull links on this matter, why ext
doesn`t need defragmentation ...
Thanks in advance for your understanding.
It's very simple, and not exclusive to Linux - it goes back to the early 
days of Unix.

The best way to think of it is that your filesystem is one of those 
folders that has a separate plastic envelope for each page.  Imagine 
you're a secretary who has to store documents in such a folder.  To 
start off, you put in the first document at the beginning, then the 
second document after it, and so on.

The difference comes when you bin some documents (delete files).  If 
you're a Unix/Linux secretary, and you have a ten-page document, you 
look for the first empty space in the folder that has at least ten 
envelopes and put your document there.  If you're a Windows secretary, 
you start filing the document in the first empty space you find, even if 
it only has three envelopes.  You then look for another empty space, and 
file the next few pages of your document, and so on.  Eventually, the 
documents in your foder are so spread out and mixed up that you have to 
take them all out and put them back in some kind of order 
(defragmentation). Stupid, isn't it?

Sir Robin

--
Some guy breaking into a government computer system and wreaking havoc
makes for a more interesting movie plot than some guy writing device
drivers. It's hard to work in a good 10-minutes car chase scene with some
guy who writes device drivers... - tjc, post to LWN
Robin Turner
IDMYO
Bilkent Univeritesi
Ankara 06533
Turkey
www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] defragmentation

2003-06-30 Thread newarts
Sir Robin,
Excelent explanation, me and the other newbies (i`m sure of it) we thank you
for it, i finally understood fragmentation process in windows and unix/linux
file system. Thank you again !

Regards from
newArTs.
- Original Message -
From: Robin Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 2:56 AM
Subject: Re: [newbie] defragmentation


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  No, but it would be very usefull if the most experienced ppl on this
mail
  list
  would give us an explanation or some usefull links on this matter, why
ext
  doesn`t need defragmentation ...
  Thanks in advance for your understanding.

 It's very simple, and not exclusive to Linux - it goes back to the early
 days of Unix.

 The best way to think of it is that your filesystem is one of those
 folders that has a separate plastic envelope for each page.  Imagine
 you're a secretary who has to store documents in such a folder.  To
 start off, you put in the first document at the beginning, then the
 second document after it, and so on.

 The difference comes when you bin some documents (delete files).  If
 you're a Unix/Linux secretary, and you have a ten-page document, you
 look for the first empty space in the folder that has at least ten
 envelopes and put your document there.  If you're a Windows secretary,
 you start filing the document in the first empty space you find, even if
 it only has three envelopes.  You then look for another empty space, and
 file the next few pages of your document, and so on.  Eventually, the
 documents in your foder are so spread out and mixed up that you have to
 take them all out and put them back in some kind of order
 (defragmentation). Stupid, isn't it?

 Sir Robin

 --
 Some guy breaking into a government computer system and wreaking havoc
 makes for a more interesting movie plot than some guy writing device
 drivers. It's hard to work in a good 10-minutes car chase scene with some
 guy who writes device drivers... - tjc, post to LWN

 Robin Turner
 IDMYO
 Bilkent Univeritesi
 Ankara 06533
 Turkey

 www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin










 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] defragmentation

2003-06-30 Thread stormjumper
to clarify the point abit, relating to Sir Robin's post below and David E
Fox's post with the link to the Suse explanation, is it fair to start of by
saying that ext2/3 does not need file defragmentation, as the expense of
disk fragmentation?

due to the way it grabs free space, there will always be lotsa empty space
between files, while (for example) say a 50% used disk with majority small
files can concievably use up to 90% or more of the disc surface.

doesn't this increase the seek time, since the head has to move across the
entire radius of the disc?
 - Original Message -
 From: Robin Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 2:56 AM
 Subject: Re: [newbie] defragmentation


  It's very simple, and not exclusive to Linux - it goes back to the early
  days of Unix.
 
  The best way to think of it is that your filesystem is one of those
  folders that has a separate plastic envelope for each page.  Imagine
  you're a secretary who has to store documents in such a folder.  To
  start off, you put in the first document at the beginning, then the
  second document after it, and so on.
 
  The difference comes when you bin some documents (delete files).  If
  you're a Unix/Linux secretary, and you have a ten-page document, you
  look for the first empty space in the folder that has at least ten
  envelopes and put your document there.  If you're a Windows secretary,
  you start filing the document in the first empty space you find, even if
  it only has three envelopes.  You then look for another empty space, and
  file the next few pages of your document, and so on.  Eventually, the
  documents in your foder are so spread out and mixed up that you have to
  take them all out and put them back in some kind of order
  (defragmentation). Stupid, isn't it?
 
  Sir Robin
 
  --
  Some guy breaking into a government computer system and wreaking havoc
  makes for a more interesting movie plot than some guy writing device
  drivers. It's hard to work in a good 10-minutes car chase scene with
some
  guy who writes device drivers... - tjc, post to LWN
 
  Robin Turner
  IDMYO
  Bilkent Univeritesi
  Ankara 06533
  Turkey
 
  www.bilkent.edu.tr/~robin


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] defragmentation

2003-06-28 Thread David E Fox
 does linux need to be defragmented ?

No. Linux uses filesystems that are very fragmentation resistant, for
various degrees of 'very'.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] defragmentation

2003-06-28 Thread newarts
No, but it would be very usefull if the most experienced ppl on this mail
list
would give us an explanation or some usefull links on this matter, why ext
doesn`t need defragmentation ...
Thanks in advance for your understanding.

Regards from
newArTs.
- Original Message -
From: Tsyko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 11:39 PM
Subject: [newbie] defragmentation


 Ok you can all laugh now...


 does linux need to be defragmented ?

 Tsyko








 Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
 Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] defragmentation

2003-06-28 Thread Paul
On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 22:39, Tsyko wrote:
 Ok you can all laugh now...

Okay, if it humors you: laugh laugh  ;)

 does linux need to be defragmented ?

Nope. EXT2 etc. take care of that themselves, since the 'Linux' approach
of storing files is different from the way M$-dos does this.

Paul
-- 
Thou shalt not get physically involved with the computer system, 
especially if you're already married. 

http://nlpagan.net - Linux Mandrake - Ximian Evolution


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] defragmentation

2003-06-28 Thread Tsyko
Another good reason why linux rocks...


This is da bomb

On Saturday, 28 June 2003 18:50, Paul wrote:
 On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 22:39, Tsyko wrote:
  Ok you can all laugh now...

 Okay, if it humors you: laugh laugh  ;)

  does linux need to be defragmented ?

 Nope. EXT2 etc. take care of that themselves, since the 'Linux' approach
 of storing files is different from the way M$-dos does this.

 Paul


Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


RE: [newbie] defragmentation

2003-06-28 Thread Frankie
not unless you use JFS filesystem...

and don't do that cos SCO will sue your ass, as its one of the things they
claim IBM stole and gave to linux.

rgds

Franki

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tsyko
Sent: Sunday, 29 June 2003 4:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] defragmentation


Ok you can all laugh now...


does linux need to be defragmented ?

Tsyko



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com


Re: [newbie] defragmentation

2003-06-28 Thread David E Fox
 No, but it would be very usefull if the most experienced ppl on this mail
 list
 would give us an explanation or some usefull links on this matter, why ext

Well, google for ext2 and fragmentation. Among the more detailed
items is one from Suse - http://sdb.suse.de/en/sdb/html/ext2frag.html.



Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com