SV: [nhusers] Re: component with a non default .ctor
Wasn't that what you were looking for?
http://www.nhforge.org/doc/nh/en/index.html#components-dependentobjects
The component element allows a parent subelement that maps a property of
the component class as a reference back to the containing entity.
Från: nhusers@googlegroups.com [nhus...@googlegroups.com] f#246;r Jan Limpens
[jan.limp...@gmail.com]
Skickat: den 27 september 2009 03:18
Till: nhusers@googlegroups.com
Ämne: [nhusers] Re: component with a non default .ctor
???
2009/9/26 Roger Kratz roger.kr...@teleopti.com:
How could I pass
a reference of it's owner to the component?
parent
Från: nhusers@googlegroups.com [nhus...@googlegroups.com] f#246;r Jan
Limpens [jan.limp...@gmail.com]
Skickat: den 26 september 2009 00:45
Till: nhusers@googlegroups.com
Ämne: [nhusers] Re: component with a non default .ctor
I am not sure how this could be mapped ... does nh behave like a di
container in this situation? even though, how would nh know which
instance is the right one? How could I pass
a reference of it's owner to the component?
2009/9/25 Fabio Maulo fabioma...@gmail.com:
when you will upload from NH, NH will inject it through property or field
(depending on your mapping)
2009/9/25 Jan Limpens jan.limp...@gmail.com
yes, but how does Discounts get the reference to IHaveDiscounts?
2009/9/25 Fabio Maulo fabioma...@gmail.com
protected DiscountOrder(){}
2009/9/25 Jan Limpens jan.limp...@gmail.com
I have
class Order:IHaveDiscounts
public Order(){
discounts = new DiscountContext(this);
}
DiscountContext Discounts
get { return discounts ;}
and
class DiscountOrder(IHaveDiscounts discounted)
...
Order is a mapped entity and I want to use DiscountOrder as a
component to strip Order from behaviour it should not really own, it's
becoming WAY to big, anyway. But when I try this NH complains about
it:
No default constructor for entity: DiscountContext
Is there an easy way around this? Currently I seem to hit my head on
NH all the time when I try to keep my domain as I think it should be
:(
--
Jan
--
Fabio Maulo
--
Jan
--
Fabio Maulo
--
Jan
--
Jan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
nhusers group.
To post to this group, send email to nhusers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nhusers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[nhusers] Re: DateTime2 SQL2008 millisecond bug?
Dario, I've updated NH-1973 with the latest version of the test case. I'll have a look in the NH code to see if I can work out how to fix it, but I've only just downloaded the codebase and haven't even got it to compile yet ;) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups nhusers group. To post to this group, send email to nhusers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nhusers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[nhusers] Re: DateTime2 SQL2008 millisecond bug?
Graham,If you copypaste the explication you have sent to the dev-list in the NH-1973 ticket would be fine. Don't worry about the fix (it is easy for us). 2009/9/27 Graham Bunce grahambu...@hotmail.com Dario, I've updated NH-1973 with the latest version of the test case. I'll have a look in the NH code to see if I can work out how to fix it, but I've only just downloaded the codebase and haven't even got it to compile yet ;) -- Fabio Maulo --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups nhusers group. To post to this group, send email to nhusers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nhusers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[nhusers] Re: component with a non default .ctor
Yes it was - it was just for the brevity of you first answer that I
was unable to put it into context.
Great! Thanks!
2009/9/27 Roger Kratz roger.kr...@teleopti.com:
Wasn't that what you were looking for?
http://www.nhforge.org/doc/nh/en/index.html#components-dependentobjects
The component element allows a parent subelement that maps a property of
the component class as a reference back to the containing entity.
Från: nhusers@googlegroups.com [nhus...@googlegroups.com] f#246;r Jan
Limpens [jan.limp...@gmail.com]
Skickat: den 27 september 2009 03:18
Till: nhusers@googlegroups.com
Ämne: [nhusers] Re: component with a non default .ctor
???
2009/9/26 Roger Kratz roger.kr...@teleopti.com:
How could I pass
a reference of it's owner to the component?
parent
Från: nhusers@googlegroups.com [nhus...@googlegroups.com] f#246;r Jan
Limpens [jan.limp...@gmail.com]
Skickat: den 26 september 2009 00:45
Till: nhusers@googlegroups.com
Ämne: [nhusers] Re: component with a non default .ctor
I am not sure how this could be mapped ... does nh behave like a di
container in this situation? even though, how would nh know which
instance is the right one? How could I pass
a reference of it's owner to the component?
2009/9/25 Fabio Maulo fabioma...@gmail.com:
when you will upload from NH, NH will inject it through property or field
(depending on your mapping)
2009/9/25 Jan Limpens jan.limp...@gmail.com
yes, but how does Discounts get the reference to IHaveDiscounts?
2009/9/25 Fabio Maulo fabioma...@gmail.com
protected DiscountOrder(){}
2009/9/25 Jan Limpens jan.limp...@gmail.com
I have
class Order:IHaveDiscounts
public Order(){
discounts = new DiscountContext(this);
}
DiscountContext Discounts
get { return discounts ;}
and
class DiscountOrder(IHaveDiscounts discounted)
...
Order is a mapped entity and I want to use DiscountOrder as a
component to strip Order from behaviour it should not really own, it's
becoming WAY to big, anyway. But when I try this NH complains about
it:
No default constructor for entity: DiscountContext
Is there an easy way around this? Currently I seem to hit my head on
NH all the time when I try to keep my domain as I think it should be
:(
--
Jan
--
Fabio Maulo
--
Jan
--
Fabio Maulo
--
Jan
--
Jan
--
Jan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
nhusers group.
To post to this group, send email to nhusers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nhusers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[nhusers] Duplicate Class/Entity Mapping Error
I have this domain hierarchy:
User - EntityWithAuditDate - Entity
Here is the domain: (simplified)
public class User : EntityWithAuditDate
{
public User(){}
public virtual string Name { get; set; }
}
public abstract class EntityWithAuditDate : Entity
{
public EntityWithAuditDate() { }
public virtual DateTime? CreatedAt { get; set; }
}
And the mapping(simplified):
class name=User table=Users abstract=false
id name=Id type=Int32 column=UserId
generator class=identity /
/id
property name=Name type=String/
property name =CreatedAt/
/class
When I ran a mapping integration unit test (http://ayende.com/Blog/
archive/2006/08/09/NHibernateMappingCreatingSanityChecks.aspx), I got
this error:
--
Tests.AltNetTime.Data.NHibernateMaps.MappingIntegrationTests.CanConfirmDatabaseMatchesMappings:
FluentNHibernate.Cfg.FluentConfigurationException : An invalid or
incomplete configuration was used while creating a SessionFactory.
Check PotentialReasons collection, and InnerException for more detail.
* Database was not configured through Database method.
FluentNHibernate.Cfg.FluentConfigurationException : An invalid
or incomplete configuration was used while creating a SessionFactory.
Check PotentialReasons collection, and InnerException for more detail.
* Database was not configured through Database method.
NHibernate.MappingException : Could not compile the mapping
document: (XmlDocument)
NHibernate.DuplicateMappingException : Duplicate class/entity
mapping AltNetTime.Core.User
TearDown : System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException : Exception has
been thrown by the target of an invocation.
System.Collections.Generic.KeyNotFoundException : The given
key was not present in the dictionary.
The unit test passed if the User class inherits from Entity instead.
Also, I had to remove the CreatedAt property from the mapping file.
Apparently, there was something wrong with the EntityWithAuditDate
class. I am not sure what caused the duplicate class/entity mapping.
Any ideas?
Thanks.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
nhusers group.
To post to this group, send email to nhusers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nhusers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[nhusers] Re: DateTime2 SQL2008 millisecond bug?
Thanks ! I will have a look soon. Cheers ;) On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 7:24 AM, Graham Bunce grahambu...@hotmail.comwrote: Dario, I've updated NH-1973 with the latest version of the test case. I'll have a look in the NH code to see if I can work out how to fix it, but I've only just downloaded the codebase and haven't even got it to compile yet ;) -- Dario Quintana http://darioquintana.com.ar --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups nhusers group. To post to this group, send email to nhusers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to nhusers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
[nhusers] Re: Proxy Validator changes in 2.1
internal virtual can't be intercepted.If you want you can simply turn off de
proxy validator and manage any kind of surprise by yourself.
property name=use_proxy_validatorfalse/property
2009/9/27 Brendan Kowitz brendan.kow...@gmail.com
Hi,
Can someone please help me understand the following:
In the previous version of NH (2.0.1) the following property will
validate and is compatible with the Castle Proxies:
internal virtual BusinessObject Parent
{
get { /*code*/ }
}
However, in 2.1 it errors saying that the types should be virtual
'public/protected' or 'protected internal'.
I have issues with this because marking a property with 'protected
internal' exposes the property to inherited types in OTHER assemblies
(effectively protected OR internal). Given that this was never a
requirement before, it feels like a bit of a bad requirement to impose
now.
Can someone please explain why this requirement is now there and what
it is trying to enforce so I can at least understand what it is
intending to achieve.
If this restriction is not entirely needed, and I am 100% certain
these types of properties will NEVER map to DB properties I am
intending to create my own Mashup ByteCode provider using the Castle
proxy factory and the Type Validator from 2.0.1.
Thanks,
Brendan
--
Fabio Maulo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
nhusers group.
To post to this group, send email to nhusers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
nhusers+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/nhusers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
