Re: Is there a package that handles random forest algorithm in nim?

2019-03-21 Thread nnahito
Thank you for your answer, @mratsim!

> No there is none Oh, I see.
> 
> though I'll probably add one to Arraymancer at one point. > Depending on how 
> familiar you are with C++, it might be easier to wrap XGBoost or LightGBM or 
> ask someone to wrap them using nimterop.

I wait to be added the code of random forest or other, because I have never 
written c++.

Thank you!


Re: problem with nimpy and nimAes

2019-03-21 Thread nimpython
Thanks for reply you are right the returned data is not valid utf-8 and I also 
try to change the return type to array, it seems doesn’t work either.


Re: Begginer's question - pointers and refs

2019-03-21 Thread aguspiza2
Yes you are right. I was thinking about type definiton while the question was 
about variable definition. Thanks.


Re: problem with nimpy and nimAes

2019-03-21 Thread meep
Nimpy encodes your string to a sequence of bytes using utf-8 (in proc 
pyStringToNim). When returning $output1, nimpy needs to do the inverse of this 
encoding step. The error is probably raised because the encrypted data is not 
valid utf-8, which causes the decoding to throw an exception.

My suggestion would be to change your function to use a return type that maps 
to a python bytes object. (bytes is the recommended type for storing binary 
data in python3.)


Re: Begginer's question - pointers and refs

2019-03-21 Thread mratsim
@aguspiza, I think you are confused about mutability/immutability, var and ref.

var means mutable. ref means object on the heap with reference semantics. They 
are somewhat orthogonal concepts.


Re: "Nim needs better documentation" - share your thoughts

2019-03-21 Thread mratsim
I think I have 0.19.0 in docset, I don't remember who provided the links though 
(iirc it was from a dropbox).


Re: strutils find

2019-03-21 Thread dataman
There is awesome [String Matching Algorithms Research 
Tool](https://smart-tool.github.io/smart/). 


Re: strutils find

2019-03-21 Thread Araq
Well one easy heuristic is to only use the lookup table if the search 
substring's length is >= 4 and otherwise use the bruteforce algorithm. It's of 
course tricky to figure out a good criterion for a standard library 
implementation. PRs are welcome.


strutils find

2019-03-21 Thread adrianv
playing around with text search (strutils.find) I realized, that the nim find 
implementation uses a Boyer-Moore algorithm. This is nice in many cases, but 
there are scenarios where a naive brute force search is faster (small search 
patterns and/or a simple one shot search like find("nim is a great programming 
language", "great")). The situation gets worse, when a stupid user like me uses 
the find repeatedly without precalculating the SkipTable. - I know stupid 
programmers write stupid code.

Now I tried to find a better find algorithm. After some googling my first stop 
was a Knuth-Morris-Pratt, but in all my benchmarks a simple brute force find 
was better (Maybe someone can show me an artificial search string and pattern 
where KMP shines? ). Than I had a genius idea and "invented" a rolling hash 
search. After implementing it, I googled again and found out that I 
re-"invented" a naive form of the Rabin-Karp algorithm :) But to my 
astonishment my naive implementation works very well. In all my tests, it is 
always better than the naive brute force search. In many cases it beats the BM 
and when it looses it is not so bad. But I want to make some more tests to be 
sure. Can someone show me some real world test where BM shines - my current 
observation is the longer the pattern, the better is BM.

When it turns out like I guess, I would like to suggest the following for the 
strutils find:

  * find a cut off size for patterns where BM is likely to be better than RK
  * for smaller patterns use the RK
  * for longer patterns use the BM



what do you think ?


Re: "Nim needs better documentation" - share your thoughts

2019-03-21 Thread andrea
https://github.com/wicast/nim-docset


Re: "Nim needs better documentation" - share your thoughts

2019-03-21 Thread DTxplorer
Hi, I just discovered Zeal browser and that made docs reading (like terrible 
GNU docs) less painful.

[https://www.casimages.com/i/19032110495424237016167956.png.html](https://www.casimages.com/i/19032110495424237016167956.png.html)

A VS code extension can open the docs from editor.

[https://github.com/deerawan/vscode-dash](https://github.com/deerawan/vscode-dash)

So why not saving Nim pages in a docset format ?