[Ninux-day] Ubiquiti M2, M5 and ad-hoc
Hi! Have anybody tested Ubiquiti M2 or M5 units (like bullets or loco) with ad-hoc? Does it work? Does even maybe work ad-hoc and AP at the same time? So we are thinking of using M2 units in ad-hoc mode and M5 for point-to-point backbone links. Mitar ___ Ninux-day mailing list Ninux-day@ml.ninux.org http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/ninux-day
Re: [Ninux-day] Ubiquiti M2, M5 and ad-hoc
Ei Mitar. We are using M5, but in infrastructure mode. More info https://wiki.graz.funkfeuer.at/UbntStations 2011/1/14 Mitar > Hi! > > Have anybody tested Ubiquiti M2 or M5 units (like bullets or loco) with > ad-hoc? Does it work? > > Does even maybe work ad-hoc and AP at the same time? > > So we are thinking of using M2 units in ad-hoc mode and M5 for > point-to-point backbone links. > > > Mitar > ___ > Ninux-day mailing list > Ninux-day@ml.ninux.org > http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/ninux-day > ___ Ninux-day mailing list Ninux-day@ml.ninux.org http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/ninux-day
Re: [Ninux-day] Ubiquiti M2, M5 and ad-hoc
On 14/01/11 15.38, Albert Homs i Gall wrote: > Ei Mitar. We are using M5, but in infrastructure mode. More info > https://wiki.graz.funkfeuer.at/UbntStations > In the Ninux network we have some links with AirOS with Olsr [0] in Infrastructure mode because it doesn't work in AdHoc mode. If you install OpenWRT you can use the M5 in Ad hoc mode. [0] |http://nnx.me/j| -- Stefano Pilla pub 2048R/7A14FB6C 2009-10-05 [expires: 2014-10-04] Key fingerprint: 6EB6 E497 B431 C251 A75C 49D9 0B7B 2E86 7A14 FB6C Phone: +39 340 37 23 206 Cisco CCNA: CSCO11667427 Cisco Certified Academy Instructor (CCAI) Web: http://www.stefanopilla.it E-mail: me[at]stefanopilla.it signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Ninux-day mailing list Ninux-day@ml.ninux.org http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/ninux-day
Re: [Ninux-day] Ubiquiti M2, M5 and ad-hoc
> Have anybody tested Ubiquiti M2 or M5 units (like bullets or loco) with > ad-hoc? Does it work? Hi Mitar, we are using NanoStation M5 and they are working good in ad-hoc. We are also using this patch: http://freifunk.net/pipermail/wlanware/2010-December/002439.html Saverio ___ Ninux-day mailing list Ninux-day@ml.ninux.org http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/ninux-day
Re: [Ninux-day] Ubiquiti M2, M5 and ad-hoc
Hi! > we are using NanoStation M5 and they are working good in ad-hoc. With OpenWrt/ath9k or with AirOS/closed source drivers? Mitar ___ Ninux-day mailing list Ninux-day@ml.ninux.org http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/ninux-day
Re: [Ninux-day] Ubiquiti M2, M5 and ad-hoc
>> we are using NanoStation M5 and they are working good in ad-hoc. > > With OpenWrt/ath9k or with AirOS/closed source drivers? OpenWRT backfire Saverio ___ Ninux-day mailing list Ninux-day@ml.ninux.org http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/ninux-day
Re: [Ninux-day] Ubiquiti M2, M5 and ad-hoc
Hi! >>> we are using NanoStation M5 and they are working good in ad-hoc. >> >> With OpenWrt/ath9k or with AirOS/closed source drivers? > > OpenWRT backfire Hm. But how does that work? I thought that there is not ad-hoc in N standard? So this is G ad-hoc just on 5 GHz (or A ad-hoc)? Mitar ___ Ninux-day mailing list Ninux-day@ml.ninux.org http://ml.ninux.org/mailman/listinfo/ninux-day
