Re: [Nix-dev] ffmpeg 1.1
A quick look at all-packages.nix shows that the following packages currently use ffmpeg 1.0: - vlc - cfdg If these 2 compile fine with 1.1, then 1.1 can replace 1.0, otherwise just have 1.0 and 1.1 I would call it 1.1 for now, as ffmpeg upgrades usually seem to break quite some packages and changes the versioning scheme quite a bit. Noone can guarantee that 1.2 will be a drop-in replacement for 1.1, so it's quite possible we will need both of the for a short time, until packages get fixed. By calling it 1.x this becomes awkward, because you would end up with 1.x _and_ 1.1 or 1.2. Regards, Mathijs On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote: > Hello, > > how can I we update to ffmpeg 1.1? > > We have a '1.0.nix' file, and 'ffmpeg_1_0' attribute, that I guess we could > move > to either '1.1.nix' or '1.x.nix', in the sense that we don't have to keep 1.0 > around. > > What do you prefer? 1.x.nix, 1.1.nix, both 1.0 and 1.1 available, ...? > > Regards, > Lluís. > ___ > nix-dev mailing list > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
Re: [Nix-dev] mips64el: syntax error in 'replace-dependency.nix'
> Are you doing chroot builds? No, '/etc/nix/nix.conf' is empty. Also, the following errors appeared after that error. [root@nixos:/]# ls sh: /run/current-system/sw/bin/ls: No such file or directory [root@nixos:/]# cd [root@nixos:~]# whoami sh: /run/current-system/sw/bin/whoami: No such file or directory ('cd' works.) I doubt that a different '/bin/sh' will help. This tarball worked in the past. Nikita pgpN4hOTmkmY1.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
[Nix-dev] ffmpeg 1.1
Hello, how can I we update to ffmpeg 1.1? We have a '1.0.nix' file, and 'ffmpeg_1_0' attribute, that I guess we could move to either '1.1.nix' or '1.x.nix', in the sense that we don't have to keep 1.0 around. What do you prefer? 1.x.nix, 1.1.nix, both 1.0 and 1.1 available, ...? Regards, Lluís. ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
Re: [Nix-dev] [Nix-commits] [NixOS/nixpkgs] 5626c5: replace-dependency: don't break nixpkgs for people...
Hi, On 12/01/13 15:48, Shea Levy wrote: > Branch: refs/heads/master > Home: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs > Commit: 5626c5cdfb6de664881eb8b79dd54a8f4ca19b8f > > https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/5626c5cdfb6de664881eb8b79dd54a8f4ca19b8f > Author: Shea Levy > Date: 2013-01-12 (Sat, 12 Jan 2013) > > Changed paths: > M pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix > > Log Message: > --- > replace-dependency: don't break nixpkgs for people living in the stone age Urgh, please rename this to replaceDependency. (Likewise for every other variable pkgs/build-support/replace-dependency.nix.) Function/variable names in Nix use lower camel case, not dashes. Also, why is this function included in the all-packages.nix attribute set? It's not a package, so there's no need to include it there. Putting it in lib seems better. -- Eelco Dolstra | LogicBlox, Inc. | http://nixos.org/~eelco/ ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev