Re: [Nix-dev] Changing how we compose all-packages and stdenvs

[Ericson, John]

Understood, and no offense taken :). Also, If it is more convenient to just
review the first N commits, the PR is easy to break up and merge in pieces.

John

On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Vladimír Čunát  wrote:

> On 05/07/2016 10:52 PM, Ericson, John wrote:
> > I have a PR[1] at that makes simplifies things [...]
>
> I've had it in my queue for some time, but it's not easy to
> (immediately) find enough time to review such large things...
>
> --Vladimir
>
>
>
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

Re: [Nix-dev] Changing how we compose all-packages and stdenvs

[Vladimír Čunát]

On 05/07/2016 10:52 PM, Ericson, John wrote:
> I have a PR[1] at that makes simplifies things [...]

I've had it in my queue for some time, but it's not easy to
(immediately) find enough time to review such large things...

--Vladimir




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev

[Nix-dev] Changing how we compose all-packages and stdenvs

[Ericson, John]

I have a PR[1] at that makes simplifies things by plunging in stdenvs to
top-level rather than calling back and forth. Additionally @Mathnerd314 has
a few extra commits on top, that look good to me. [See the PR description
and comment thread for a clarification on all of that.]

The PR hasn't received any attention in the last week or so, and
furthermore as a fairly fundamental (if invisible) change to the way
nixpkgs works, I think it should get as many eyes as possible, especially
from those that maintain the stdenvs today. Hence I am emailing the list.

Thanks,

John

[1]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/15043
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev