Re: [Nix-dev] Problem compiling GHC 8.0.1 on Debian
You're right, thanks! I'll try master before asking next time. Jeff On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Peter Simons wrote: > Hi Jeff, > > > I'm stuck compiling GHC 8.0.1... the current nixpkgs-unstable version > > gives a hash mismatch. > > that issue was fixed in d1b34967fea22f535c1a009f3af290c347455e8a, which > is in master but probably not in the unstable channel yet. > > Best regards, > Peter > > ___ > nix-dev mailing list > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
Re: [Nix-dev] Problem compiling GHC 8.0.1 on Debian
Hi Jeff, > I'm stuck compiling GHC 8.0.1... the current nixpkgs-unstable version > gives a hash mismatch. that issue was fixed in d1b34967fea22f535c1a009f3af290c347455e8a, which is in master but probably not in the unstable channel yet. Best regards, Peter ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
Re: [Nix-dev] Problem compiling GHC 8.0.1 on Debian
Ah that makes sense. I'm so used to Nix I just assume URLs with long hash-looking things in them will always have the same contents. So would the best solution be to update the rest of the package to match, and if that doesn't work find the old patch instead? Jeff On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 4:14 PM, Vladimír Čunát wrote: > On 09/20/2016 09:52 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > Is GHC broken for anyone else? And if not, what makes my setup special? > > Am I being redirected to the wrong patch url somehow? > > That feels like upstream updating the release tarball by applying some > patch(es). > > --Vladimir > > > ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
Re: [Nix-dev] Problem compiling GHC 8.0.1 on Debian
On 09/20/2016 09:52 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > Is GHC broken for anyone else? And if not, what makes my setup special? > Am I being redirected to the wrong patch url somehow? That feels like upstream updating the release tarball by applying some patch(es). --Vladimir smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
[Nix-dev] Problem compiling GHC 8.0.1 on Debian
I have NixOS, but am trying to install my existing packages in the home
folder of a Debian machine too for work. I'm stuck compiling GHC 8.0.1...
the current nixpkgs-unstable version gives a hash mismatch, which I "fixed"
like so:
diff --git a/pkgs/development/compilers/ghc/8.0.1.nix
b/pkgs/development/compilers/ghc/8.0.1.nix
index e607ef7..2fb6afe 100644
--- a/pkgs/development/compilers/ghc/8.0.1.nix
+++ b/pkgs/development/compilers/ghc/8.0.1.nix
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ stdenv.mkDerivation rec {
./relocation.patch
# Fix https://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/12130
-(fetchFilteredPatch { url =
https://git.haskell.org/ghc.git/patch/4d71cc89b4e9648f3fbb29c8fcd25d725616e265;
sha256 = "0syaxb4y4s2dc440qmrggb4vagvqqhb55m6mx12rip4i9qhxl8k0"; })
+(fetchFilteredPatch { url =
https://git.haskell.org/ghc.git/patch/4d71cc89b4e9648f3fbb29c8fcd25d725616e265;
sha256 = "1z30999wgv1qnsd5kypj4lw33nj0yn0k0bax0yciqxnl1py0s87s"; })
(fetchFilteredPatch { url =
https://git.haskell.org/ghc.git/patch/2f8cd14fe909a377b3e084a4f2ded83a0e6d44dd;
sha256 = "06zvlgcf50ab58bw6yw3krn45dsmhg4cmlz4nqff8k4z1f1bj01v"; })
] ++ stdenv.lib.optional stdenv.isLinux ./ghc-no-madv-free.patch;
But I think that might have been a mistake, because now patch fails to
apply:
building path(s)
‘/home/user/nix/store/7alsswffmxxv86cjjw1v13jl3a7q4dfy-ghc-8.0.1’,
‘/home/user/nix/store/y45l8rlzkahbv8rgx15vv8axbaisvfid-ghc-8.0.1-doc’
unpacking sources
unpacking source archive
/home/user/nix/store/8ppp85yckr3ksksg1jxlj8r9rkfm5pzx-ghc-8.0.1-src.tar.xz
source root is ghc-8.0.1
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH to timestamp 1463503024 of file
ghc-8.0.1/utils/genprimopcode/Parser.hs
patching sources
applying patch
/home/user/nix/store/d14agb1vzr6m0hqzkrcjf3mdbxhclwg9-ghc-8.x-dont-pass-linker-flags-via-response-files.patch
patching file compiler/main/SysTools.hs
Hunk #1 succeeded at 422 (offset 8 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 944 (offset 8 lines).
applying patch
/home/user/nix/store/a7m73963gnbxzxjpr46sn9mrjlb9mjp2-relocation.patch
patching file rts/Linker.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 5855 (offset 174 lines).
applying patch
/home/user/nix/store/0ic419xjc11055bg7cgad4ki9zmfsmz2-4d71cc89b4e9648f3fbb29c8fcd25d725616e265
patching file compiler/rename/RnPat.hs
Hunk #1 succeeded at 636 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 648 (offset 1 line).
patching file testsuite/tests/th/T12130.hs
patching file testsuite/tests/th/T12130a.hs
can't find file to patch at input line 97
Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
The text leading up to this was:
--
|diff --git a/testsuite/tests/th/all.T b/testsuite/tests/th/all.T
|index 75364dc..bd59c4e 100644
|--- a/testsuite/tests/th/all.T
|+++ b/testsuite/tests/th/all.T
--
File to patch:
Skip this patch? [y]
Skipping patch.
1 out of 1 hunk ignored
builder for
‘/home/user/nix/store/aqmsxln2avyla8p7m5504ilqnxibq3wh-ghc-8.0.1.drv’
failed with exit code 1
Is GHC broken for anyone else? And if not, what makes my setup special? Am
I being redirected to the wrong patch url somehow?
Jeff
___
nix-dev mailing list
nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
