Re: [Nmh-workers] rmpproc

2013-03-18 Thread David Levine
Jerrad wrote:

> Would it be possible to expose rmmproc as an option for rmm?

> Just a thought, though I understand if it seems like
> Yet Another Switch

I had that feeling when putting rmmproc support in mhfixmsg.
But, I agree that it would be useful.  Unless there's
strenuous objection, I'll add -[no]rmmproc to both rmm and
mhfixmsg.

The rmm man page already mentions -normmproc, though where
it's talking about refile.  It makes sense, I think, for
both rmm and refile to support -[no]rmmproc.

David

___
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers


[Nmh-workers] rmpproc

2013-03-18 Thread belg4mit
Would it be possible to expose rmmproc as an option for rmm?
I currently have my profile rmmproc set to rm, since in my
shell rm is aliased to 'refile -normmproc !* +Trash' and
empty is '/usr/local/bin/rmm +Trash !*; folder -pack'

However this makes it difficult to have backups for mhfixmsg,
and leads to some minor race conditions with my current mail
config. I can work around these with loops or a dummy profiles,
but the ability to specify rmmproc on the commandline could
simplify things.

(Maybe I should make empty 'rm `mhpath +Trash !*`; folder-pack'
but there may be another reason rmmproc is rm I'm forgetting)

Just a thought, though I understand if it seems like
Yet Another Switch

___
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers