[Nmh-workers] using maildir as mh mailstore

2010-01-30 Thread Paul Fox
since i'm sure others have thought about this in the past, i have
to ask, even though i think the answer is no:

can anyone see a way of integrating the mh notion of per-message
storage with the maildir notion of per-message storage?  i've
been trying to think of schemes involving hard- or soft-links, or
other ways of rationalizing the namespace differences (i.e.,
numeric mh names vs.  time-inode-host maildir names).  but i'm
coming up short.

the idea, of course, would be to move mh to a more popular, and
better-supported mailstore.  i might even be willing to sacrifice 
esoteric mh features that might depend on properties of the mh
store, as long as most basic functionality were preserved.

paul
=-
 paul fox, p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 27.0 degrees)


___
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers


Re: [Nmh-workers] using maildir as mh mailstore

2010-01-30 Thread Jerrad Pierce
Why?

What difference does it make if MH's mail store format is non-standard?
If you ever need to export things there's packf (although some scripting
may be necessary to handle nested folders) to get an mbox.

You wouldn't just be sacrificing esoteric features of MH, but also much
of ability to easily work with messages via standard tools, and the ability
to intuit things about a message based upon its number.

OTOH, a FUSE layer that did maildir to MH translation would be an easy way
of getting IMAP support via the aforementioned Offline IMAP, and a layer
going the other way to make MH look like maildir oughn't be too difficult.

Maildir's all about integrity, and pulling all of that into nmh would be
non-trivial. Or do you mean perhaps something that can read Maildir,
but doesn't adhere to the specs? I'm still unclear as to what is gained.
-- 
Free map of local environmental resources: http://CambridgeMA.GreenMap.org
--
MOTD on Setting Orange, the 30th of Chaos, in the YOLD 3176:
How did it get so late so soon? It's night before it's afternoon. December is 
here before it's June. My goodness how the time has flewn. How did it get so 
late so soon? -Dr. Seuss


___
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers


Re: [Nmh-workers] using maildir as mh mailstore

2010-01-30 Thread Jerrad Pierce
Sorry, a little more...

Apparently somebody also thought it was a good idea though,
and one of the top results from Google for nmh maildir is:

  http://www.jeenyus.net/linux/mdmh.html

Where someone created some reimplementations of MH comamnds
for use with maildir; the author seems to have drunk the
Kool-Aid as to just how bulletproof maildir is though.

Re: Past discussion
http://www.mail-archive.com/nmh-work...@mhost.com/msg01224.html
-- 
Free map of local environmental resources: http://CambridgeMA.GreenMap.org
--
MOTD on Setting Orange, the 30th of Chaos, in the YOLD 3176:
How did it get so late so soon? It's night before it's afternoon. December is 
here before it's June. My goodness how the time has flewn. How did it get so 
late so soon? -Dr. Seuss


___
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers


Re: [Nmh-workers] using maildir as mh mailstore

2010-01-30 Thread Paul Fox
jerrad wrote:
  Why?
  
  What difference does it make if MH's mail store format is non-standard?

better synergy, i suppose.  it might open possibilities for sharing
the mailstore with other mailers.  frankly, i'm not sure what might
be gained.  but the more time i spend thinking about it, the more
i think it's not possible, so it's fairly moot, i guess.

  If you ever need to export things there's packf (although some scripting
  may be necessary to handle nested folders) to get an mbox.

with the text corruption that that implies.

  
  You wouldn't just be sacrificing esoteric features of MH, but also much
  of ability to easily work with messages via standard tools, and the ability
  to intuit things about a message based upon its number.

i'm not sure why standard tools couldn't continue to work as well
as they do now.  but i agree that the numbering is certainly
something that would need to be preserved.

thanks for the pointers in your followup mail.  they've helped
convince me that i'm not alone in thinking it's not a productive avenue.

paul

  
  OTOH, a FUSE layer that did maildir to MH translation would be an easy way
  of getting IMAP support via the aforementioned Offline IMAP, and a layer
  going the other way to make MH look like maildir oughn't be too difficult.
  
  Maildir's all about integrity, and pulling all of that into nmh would be
  non-trivial. Or do you mean perhaps something that can read Maildir,
  but doesn't adhere to the specs? I'm still unclear as to what is gained.
  -- 
  Free map of local environmental resources: http://CambridgeMA.GreenMap.org
  --
  MOTD on Setting Orange, the 30th of Chaos, in the YOLD 3176:
  How did it get so late so soon? It's night before it's afternoon. December 
  is 
  here before it's June. My goodness how the time has flewn. How did it get so 
  late so soon? -Dr. Seuss
  
  
  ___
  Nmh-workers mailing list
  Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
  http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

=-
 paul fox, p...@foxharp.boston.ma.us (arlington, ma, where it's 15.6 degrees)


___
Nmh-workers mailing list
Nmh-workers@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers