Re: [Nmh-workers] full switch names
Might be a little word-smithy, but I'd say "durable code" or "hidden invocations" instead of "permanent code", but otherwise sounds good! (also something to include in hypothetical "extending nmh" docs ;-) ... maybe I'll give that a crack sometime soon, although I don't grok roff. ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Re: [Nmh-workers] full switch names
Hi, Jerrad wrote: > Might be a little word-smithy, but I'd say "durable code" or "hidden > invocations" instead of "permanent code" "long-lasting"? Cheers, Ralph. ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
Re: [Nmh-workers] full switch names
On Mar 1, 2014, at 4:59 PM, Ralph Corderoy wrote: >> Might be a little word-smithy, but I'd say "durable code" or "hidden >> invocations" instead of "permanent code" > > "long-lasting"? Portable. signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers